| Literature DB >> 35252222 |
Sonam Dhiman1, Sushma Kumari Saini1, Shweta Chaurasia2, Mona Duggal2, Vaibhav Miglani3, Srishti Raj2.
Abstract
AIM: To assess the impact of a culturally appropriate and theoretically driven nurse-led tele-counseling intervention to parents of children with cerebral visual impairment (CVI) on the adherence to visual therapy advised by the ophthalmologists.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; adherence; cerebral visual impairment; eye activities; nurse-led counseling; tele-counseling; visual therapy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35252222 PMCID: PMC8893197 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.740265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Consort diagram.
Socio-demographic profile of children (N = 21).
|
| |
|---|---|
|
| |
| 1–2 | 10 (47.6) |
| 2–3 | 8 (38.1) |
| ≥4 | 3 (14.3) |
|
| |
| Male | 17 (81.0) |
| Female | 4 (19.0) |
|
| |
| Not attending any school | 20 (95.2) |
| Normal school | 1 (4.8) |
|
| |
| Social class I (7,533 and above) | 9 (42.9) |
| Social class II (3,766–7,532) | 5 (23.8) |
| Social class III (2,260–3,765) | 1 (4.8) |
| Social class IV (1,130–2,259) | 3 (14.3) |
| Social class V (1,129 and below) | 3 (14.3) |
|
| |
| Nuclear family | 16 (76.2) |
| Joint family | 5 (23.8) |
|
| |
| Pucca house | 21 (100) |
|
| |
| One person per room | 9 (43.0) |
| Two persons per room | 10 (47.4) |
| Three persons per room | 2 (9.6) |
|
| |
| Urban | 8 (38.1) |
| Rural | 13 (61.9) |
| Noisy | 4 (19.0) |
| Calm | 17 (81.0) |
Socio-demographic profile of mother and father.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| ||
| 21–30 | 14 (66.7) | 6 (28.6) |
| 31–45 | 6 (28.6) | 12 (57.1) |
| ≥46 | 1 (4.8) | 2 (9.5) |
| Deceased | – | 1 (4.8) |
|
| ||
| Illiterate | 1 (4.8) | 1 (4.8) |
| Primary education | 1 (4.8) | – |
| High school education | 4 (19.0) | 2 (9.5) |
| Higher secondary education | 3 (14.3) | 5 (23.8) |
| Graduation and above | 12 (57.2) | 13 (61.9) |
|
| ||
| Managers/Professionals | 2 (9.5) | 6 (28.6) |
| Technicians and associate professionals | 1 (4.8) | 3 (14.3) |
| Service and sales workers | 1 (4.8) | 2 (9.5) |
| Skilled, Craft, and machine operators | – | 7 (33.3) |
| Unemployed/Housewife | 17 (81.0) | 3 (14.3) |
Figure 2Visual needs among children with cerebral visual impairment (10).
Treatment adherence of children.
|
| |
|---|---|
| Performed eye activities in last 1 month | 17 (81.0) |
| Time spent on eye activity per day in previous month | |
| 0 min | 3 (14.3) |
| 1–15 min | 7 (33.3) |
| 16–30 min | 8 (38.1) |
| 31–60 min | 3 (14.3) |
| Number of sessions of eye activities performed in previous month | |
| ≤ 2 sessions/day (poor adherence) | 17 (81%) |
| 3–4 sessions/day (satisfactory adherence) | 3 (14.3%) |
| 5–6 sessions/day (good adherence) | 1 (4.8%) |
| 7–8 sessions/day (excellent adherence) | – |
Figure 3Weekly mean adherence to regular eye activities as per daily diary record.
Comparison of mean score of baseline adherence with adherence after 1 month of intervention.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Baseline adherence (0 week) | 1.76 ± 1.179 | 6.660 (20) <0.001 | 1.596 | 3.051 |
| (1–4) | ||||
| Adherence after 1 month | 4.09 ± 1.782 | |||
| (0–8) | ||||
Adherence to eye activities during pre-intervention and after 1 month of nurse-led counseling intervention.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| ≤ 2 sessions/day (poor adherence) | 17 (81%) | 3(14.3) | 5.14 (1) 0.016 |
| 3–4 sessions/day (satisfactory adherence) | 3 (14.3%) | 10 (47.6) | |
| 5–6 sessions/day (good adherence) | 1 (4.8%) | 6 (28.6) | |
| 7–8 sessions/day (excellent adherence) | – | 2 (9.5) | |
For the purpose of applying McNemar's test poor adherence and satisfactory adherence were merged in one group. Good adherence and excellent adherence were merged into one group.
Comparisons of mean number of sessions of eye activities done during pre-intervention and at week 1, 2, 3, 4 after intervention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 1 | −2.252 | 0.529 | 0.000 | −3.77 | −0.73 |
| 2 | −2.306 | 0.523 | 0.000 | −3.81 | −0.80 | |
| 3 | −2.469 | 0.523 | 0.000 | −3.97 | −0.97 | |
| 4 | −2.552 | 0.529 | 0.000 | −4.07 | −1.03 | |
| 1 | 2 | −0.055 | 0.529 | 1.000 | −1.57 | 1.47 |
| 3 | −0.218 | 0.529 | 1.000 | −1.74 | 1.30 | |
| 4 | −0.301 | 0.536 | 1.000 | −1.84 | 1.24 | |
| 2 | 3 | −0.163 | 0.523 | 1.000 | −1.66 | 1.34 |
| 4 | −0.246 | 0.529 | 1.000 | −1.77 | 1.27 | |
| 3 | 4 | −0.083 | 0.529 | 1.000 | −1.60 | 1.44 |
The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Post-hoc repeated measure ANOVA.