Literature DB >> 22820813

Randomised comparison of three tools for improving compliance with occlusion therapy: an educational cartoon story, a reward calendar, and an information leaflet for parents.

A M Tjiam1, G Holtslag, H M Van Minderhout, B Simonsz-Tóth, M H L Vermeulen-Jong, G J J M Borsboom, S E Loudon, H J Simonsz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia was improved by the use of an educational programme, especially in children of parents of foreign origin and who spoke Dutch poorly. The programme consisted of: (i) a cartoon story for amblyopic children that explained without words why they should patch, (ii) a calendar with reward stickers, and (iii) an information leaflet for parents. In the current study, we assessed the individual effect of each component on compliance.
METHODS: We recruited 120 3- to 6-year-old children who lived in a low socio-economic status (SES) area in The Hague and were starting occlusion therapy for the first time. They were randomised to receive one of the components (three intervention groups), or a picture to colour (control group). The randomisation was blinded for treating orthoptist and researcher. Compliance was measured electronically using the Occlusion Dose Monitor (ODM). Primary outcome was percentage of compliance (actual/prescribed occlusion time). Secondary outcome was absolute occlusion hours per day. Parental fluency in Dutch was rated on a five-point scale.
RESULTS: Compliance could be measured electronically in 88 of the 120 children; in 32 others, it failed for various reasons. Parental fluency in Dutch was moderate or worse in 36.4 % (p = 0.327). Average compliance was 55 % standard deviation (SD) 40 (n = 18) in the control group, 89 % SD 25 in the group receiving the educational cartoon (n = 25, P = 0.002 compared with control group), 67 % SD 33 (n = 24, P = 0.301) in the reward-calendar group and 73 % SD 40 (n = 21, P = 0.119) in the parent-information-leaflet group. On average, children in the control group occluded 1:46 SD1:19 hours/day, 2:33 SD 1:18 hours/day in the group receiving the educational cartoon, 1:59 SD 1:13 hours/day in the reward-calendar group and 2:18 SD 1:13 hours/day in the parent-information-leaflet group. No child who received the cartoon story occluded less than 1 hour per day, against seven in the reward-calendar group, five in the parent-information-leaflet group and five in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Although all three components of the programme improved compliance with occlusion therapy in children in low-SES areas, the educational cartoon had the strongest effect, as it explained without words to a 4- to 5-year-old child why it should wear the eye patch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22820813     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2107-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

Review 1.  Amblyopia treatment studies.

Authors:  Darron A Bacal
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Electronic recording of occlusion treatment for amblyopia: potential of the new technology.

Authors:  Yaroslava Chopovska; Sjoukje E Loudon; Licia Cirina; Alina Zubcov; Huibert J Simonsz; Marc Lüchtenberg; Maria Fronius
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment.

Authors:  Ann L Webber; Joanne Wood
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  Doctor-parent-child communication. A (re)view of the literature.

Authors:  K Tates; L Meeuwesen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Natural history of amblyopia untreated owing to lack of compliance.

Authors:  K Simons; M Preslan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Occlusion treatment for amblyopia: assessing the performance of the electronic occlusion dose monitor.

Authors:  Maria Fronius; Yaroslava Chopovska; Julia Nolden; Sjoukje E Loudon; Marc Lüchtenberg; Alina Zubcov; Larisa Pepler
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2006-06

7.  Parental non-concordance with occlusion therapy.

Authors:  D Newsham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Rotterdam AMblyopia screening effectiveness study: detection and causes of amblyopia in a large birth cohort.

Authors:  Johanna H Groenewoud; Angela M Tjiam; V Kathleen Lantau; W Christina Hoogeveen; Jan Tjeerd H N de Faber; Rikard E Juttmann; Harry J de Koning; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  A randomised controlled trial of written information: the effect on parental non-concordance with occlusion therapy.

Authors:  D Newsham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS).

Authors:  Catherine E Stewart; Merrick J Moseley; David A Stephens; Alistair R Fielder
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends.

Authors:  Eleni Papageorgiou; Ioannis Asproudis; Gail Maconachie; Evangelia E Tsironi; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  A pilot randomized clinical trial of intermittent occlusion therapy liquid crystal glasses versus traditional patching for treatment of moderate unilateral amblyopia.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; Daniel E Neely; Jay Galli; Joshua Schliesser; April Graves; Tina G Damarjian; Jessica Kovarik; James Bowsher; Heather A Smith; Dana Donaldson; Kathryn M Haider; Gavin J Roberts; Derek T Sprunger; David A Plager
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 3.  Amblyopia and binocular vision.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  Improved monitoring of adherence with patching treatment using a microsensor and Eye Patch Assistant.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; Hongxin Xu; Bryan De La Cruz; Sarah E Morale; Reed M Jost; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 5.  The challenges of amblyopia treatment.

Authors:  Gail D E Maconachie; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  A Pilot Nurse-Led Tele-Counseling Intervention to Parents of Children With Cerebral Visual Impairment on Adherence to Eye Activities During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pre-experimental Study.

Authors:  Sonam Dhiman; Sushma Kumari Saini; Shweta Chaurasia; Mona Duggal; Vaibhav Miglani; Srishti Raj
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 7.  Knowledge translation tools for parents on child health topics: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lauren Albrecht; Shannon D Scott; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.