| Literature DB >> 35251068 |
HuaJie He1,2,3, YuZheng Zhang1,2,3, BinBin Wen1,2,3, XiangGuang Meng1,2,3, Ning Wang1,2,3, MingYun Sun1,2,3, Rui Zhang1,2,3, XueHui Zhao1,2,3, QiuPing Tan1,2,3,4, Wei Xiao1,2,3, DongMei Li1,2,3, XiLing Fu1,2,3, XiuDe Chen1,2,3, Ling Li1,2,3.
Abstract
Drought stress is a serious abiotic stress source that affects the growth and fruit quality of peach trees. However, the molecular mechanism of the NUDIX hydrolase family in peaches in response to drought stress is still unclear. Here, we isolated and identified the PpNUDX8 (Prupe.5G062300.1) gene from the peach NUDIX hydrolase family, and found that PpNUDX8 has a typical NUDIX hydrolase domain. In this study, we performed 15% PEG6000 drought treatment on peach seedlings, and qRT-PCR analysis showed that 15% PEG6000 induced the transcription level of PpNUDX8. Overexpression of PpNUDX8 reduced the tolerance of calli to 4% PEG6000 treatment. Compared with wild-type apple calli, PpNUDX8 transgenic apple calli had a lower fresh weight and higher MDA content. After 15% PEG6000 drought treatment, PpNUDX8 transgenic tobacco had a greater degree of wilting and shorter primary roots than Under control conditions. The chlorophyll, soluble protein, and proline contents in the transgenic tobacco decreased, and the MDA content and relative conductivity increased. At the same time, PpNUDX8 negatively regulated ABA signal transduction and reduced the transcriptional expression of stress response genes. In addition, PpNUDX8 was not sensitive to ABA, overexpression of PpNUDX8 reduced the expression of the ABA synthesis-related gene NCED6 and increases the expression of the ABA decomposition-related gene CYP1 in tobacco, which in turn leads to a decrease in the ABA content in tobacco. In addition, Under control conditions, overexpression of PpNUDX8 destroyed the homeostasis of NAD and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) in tobacco. After 15% PEG6000 drought treatment, the changes in NAD and NADH in PpNUDX8 transgenic tobacco were more severe than those in WT tobacco. In addition, PpNUDX8 also interacted with PpSnRk1γ (Prupe.6G323700.1).Entities:
Keywords: ABA; NAD/NADH; NUDIX hydrolase; drought stress; peach
Year: 2022 PMID: 35251068 PMCID: PMC8888663 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.831883
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Bioinformatics analysis of PpNUDX8. (A) Protein multiple sequence alignment of PpNUDX8. (B) Analysis of cis-elements in the promoter of PpNUDX8. (C) Phylogenetic tree analysis of PpNUDX8. (D) Expression profile of PpNUDX8 in peach seedlings under 15% PEG 6000 and ABA treatment. These error bars represent the mean ± SD of independent biological triplicates. According to the analysis of variance and Duncan’s test, different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 2Determination of resistance of PpNUDX8 transgenic apple calli to 4% PEG6000. (A) The growth phenotype of WT and transgenic apple calli treated on MS and MS + 4% PEG 6000 medium for 15 days. (B) Analysis of PpNUDX8 expression in WT and PpNUDX8-OE transgenic calli by qRT–PCR. (C) The fresh weight of apple callus in panel (A). (D) The MDA content of apple callus in panel (A). The error bars represent the mean ± SD extracted from independent biological triplicates. According to the analysis of variance and Duncan’s test, different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Measurement of drought tolerance of PpNUDX8 transgenic tobacco and WT. (A) The growth phenotype of WT and PpNUDX8 transgenic tobacco treated on MS and MS + 4% PEG 6000 medium for 10 days. Scale bar = 15 mm. (B) The growth phenotype of WT and PpNUDX8 transgenic tobacco treated with 15% PEG6000 for 4 h. Scale bar = 25 mm. (C) Expression analysis of WT and PpNUDX8-OX transgenic tobacco lines by RT-qPCR. (D) Analysis of the primary root length in panel (A). (E) Chlorophyll content in panel (A). (F–I) The proline content (F), soluble protein content (G), relative conductivity (H), and MDA content (I) in panel (B). The error bars represent the mean ± SD extracted from independent biological triplicates. According to the analysis of variance and Duncan’s test, different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Measurement of NAD and NADH content in PpNUDX8 transgenic tobacco and WT before and after 15% PEG6000 treatment for 4 h, and analysis of QS2 expression. (A) NAD content. (B) NADH content. (C) The ratio of NAD and NADH was calculated based on the values shown in panels (A,B). (D) Expression analysis of QS2. The error bars represent the mean ± SD extracted from independent biological triplicates. According to the analysis of variance and Duncan’s test, different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 5Analysis of the expression levels of SnRK2.2, PP2C6, PP2C53, DREBA1, RAB18, RD29A, RD29B, and LEA5 in PpNUDX8 transgenic tobacco and WT before and after treatment with 15% PEG6000 for 4 h. (A) SnRK2.2. (B) PP2C6. (C) PP2C53. (D) DREBA1. (E) RAB18. (F) RD29A. (G) RD29B. (H) LEA5. The error bars represent the mean ± SD extracted from independent biological triplicates. According to the analysis of variance and Duncan’s test, different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 6Analysis of abscisic acid (ABA) sensitivity of PpNUDX8 transgenic tobacco. (A) Phenotypes of WT and PpNUDX8 transgenic lines treated with 0 or 1 μm/L ABA during seed germination. (B) Seed germination rate in panel (A). (C) Root growth phenotypes of WT and PpNUDX8 transgenic lines treated with 0 or 10 μm/L ABA in the seedling growth stage. Scale bar = 15 mm. (D) The primary root growth in panel (C). The error bars represent the mean ± SD extracted from independent biological triplicates. According to the analysis of variance and Duncan’s test, different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 7Determination of ABA content in PpNUDX8 transgenic tobacco before and after 15% PEG6000 drought treatment and expression analysis of NCED6 and CYP1. (A) The content of ABA. (B) CYP1. (C) NCED6. The error bars represent the mean ± SD extracted from independent biological triplicates. According to the analysis of variance and Duncan’s test, different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 8Interaction between PpNUDX8 and PpSnRk1γ. (A) Y2H test shows that PpNUDX8 and PpSnRk1γ interact in yeast. (B) The interaction between PpNUDX8 and PpSnRk1γ protein in a pull-down assay.