| Literature DB >> 35243358 |
Vandana Verma1, Neelam Yadav1.
Abstract
The harmful effects of acrylamide (AA) are a major health concern for human beings. To find out the levels of AA content in commercial food products, 43 samples representing 3 important product categories (French fries, bakery biscuits, and branded biscuits) were procured from the local market in Allahabad, India. An assay of AA was done using HPLC-DAD. The LOD and LOQ for AA were 3.733 and 11.045 ng/μl, respectively. The AA recovery from ten standard solutions was 100.6 percent, indicating good extraction efficiency. Level of AA ranged between 144.35 and 781.17 μg/kg, 126.33-664.90 μg/kg, and 825.96-1143.15 μg/kg, in branded biscuits, bakery biscuits, and French fries, respectively. A strong and positive correlation of AA was found with HMF, a* value, BI and negatively with ΔE (P ≤ 0.01). It is concluded that a high browning index is significantly associated with AA content and can be used as a screening food to reduce the intake of AA in the diet.Entities:
Keywords: Acrylamide; Biscuits; Browning index; Contaminants; French fries
Year: 2022 PMID: 35243358 PMCID: PMC8881641 DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.01.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Food Sci ISSN: 2665-9271
Fig. 1Calibration graph of acrylamide standard.
Analytical data of the acrylamide standard solution analysed by HPLC-DAD.
| S.N. | Concentrations (ng/μl) | Found Conc. (ng/μl) | Recovery (Percent) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 10 | 11.025 | 110.249 |
| 2. | 20 | 19.668 | 98.340 |
| 3. | 30 | 29.930 | 99.766 |
| 4. | 40 | 39.628 | 99.071 |
| 5. | 50 | 49.196 | 98.391 |
| 6. | 60 | 60.066 | 100.110 |
| 7. | 70 | 69.877 | 99.825 |
| 8. | 80 | 80.044 | 100.055 |
| 9. | 90 | 90.409 | 100.454 |
| 10. | 100 | 100.158 | 100.158 |
| 0.99973 | 100.642 | ||
| 100.64 ± 3.45 | 3.455 | ||
| 94.748 | 3.433 | ||
| 33.092 | 3.733 | ||
| 104.645 | 11.045 |
Fig. 2HPLC chromatograms of Acrylamide; (A) standard acrylamide, (B) Bakery biscuit, (C) French fries, (D) Branded biscuits.
Acrylamide content (μg/Kg) in French fries (F) branded biscuits (H) and bakery biscuits (A) samples.
| French fries | RT (Min) | Acrylamide (μg per kg) | Branded biscuits | RT (Min) | Acrylamide (μg per kg) | Bakery biscuits | RT (Min) | Acrylamide (μg per kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.377 | 991.39 ± 0.92 | 0.477 | 0.481 | 408.85 ± 3.19 | ||||
| 0.376 | 970.86 ± 9.40 | 0.482 | 624.50 ± 1.00 | 0.482 | ||||
| 0.375 | 895.15 ± 1.62 | 0.482 | 184.58 ± 11.37 | 0.468 | 567.26 ± 0.49 | |||
| 0.378 | 850.02 ± 0.38 | 0.479 | 322.72 ± 8.11 | 0.467 | 494.41 ± 1.62 | |||
| 0.379 | 885.39 ± 0.43 | 0.475 | 188.27 ± 0.00 | 0.468 | 403.95 ± 1.61 | |||
| 0.381 | 0.461 | 0.467 | 290.65 ± 0.20 | |||||
| 0.393 | 884.91 ± 0.99 | 0.477 | 0.47 | 376.05 ± 11.58 | ||||
| 0.38 | 936.18 ± 7.36 | 0.475 | 504.21 ± 3.83 | 0.469 | 327.79 ± 0.57 | |||
| 0.391 | 836.75 ± 13.87 | 0.489 | 296.73 ± 8.72 | 0.47 | 294.84 ± 1.30 | |||
| 0.388 | 896.11 ± 11.78 | 0.476 | 366.40 ± 7.08 | 0.458 | 429.11 ± 5.60 | |||
| 0.385 | 825.96 ± 1.82 | 0.469 | 198.38 ± 11.12 | 0.468 | 481.14 ± 4.38 | |||
| 0.389 | 949.59 ± 5.48 | 0.481 | 0.466 | 334.62 ± 7.83 | ||||
| 0.386 | 914.76 ± 0.46 | 0.472 | 318.82 ± 26.36 | 0.466 | 369.91 ± 6.73 | |||
| 0.379 | 908.71 ± 0.28 | 5 sample (38 percent) showed a concentration above 350 μg/kg Benchmark level. | 0.462 | |||||
| 0.396 | 928.67 ± 0.06 | 9 sample (64 percent) showed a concentration above 350 μg per kg Benchmark level | ||||||
| 0.380 | ||||||||
| All sample (100 percent) showed a concentration above 500 μg per kg benchmark level | ||||||||
All values (Average ± Standard deviation of n = 3 independent samples) are calculated by excel.
Acrylamide content (μg per kg) of some commercial food products.
| CODE | No. of sample (n) | Moisture (Percent) | Fat (Percent) | a* | BI | ΔE | HMF (mg per kg) | Acrylamide (μg per kg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Range | Mean | Range | |||||||
| 16 | 32.41 | 14.01 | 12.46 | 125.30 | 64.56 | 9.19 | 5.65–71.81 | 929.69 ± 4.55b | 825.96–1143.15 | |
| ±6.77 | ±6.93 | ±4.6 | ±50.95 | ±8.9 | ±23.70b | |||||
| 13 | 6.07 | 16.67 ± 8.99 | 11.42 | 112.15 | 67.29 | 6.37 | 2.81–9.73 | 369.54 ± 7.42a | 144.358–781.173 | |
| ±1.47 | ±2.26 | ±24.83 | ±16.49 | ±0.2.54a | ||||||
| 14 | 6.08 | 14.08 | 15.17 | 99.39 | 81.04 | 9.80 | 3.26–19.36 | 397.84 ± 4.22a | 126.33–664.90 | |
| ±2.26 | ±5.76 | ±2.50 | ±32.18 | ±5.89 | ±4.82a | |||||
All values (Average ± Standard deviation of total samples of food groups) and a-b superscript with different alphabet shows significance difference at P ≤ 0.05 are calculated by excel.
Correlation of HMF content and Acrylamide with moisture, fat, ab value, ΔE and browning index.
| French fries | Biscuits | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acrylamide | HMF | Acrylamide | HMF | |||||
| Rho Pearson (r) | Rho Pearson (r) | Rho Pearson (r) | Rho Pearson (r) | |||||
| -.185 | .493 | -.690 | .003 | .403 | .037 | .426 | .027 | |
| .006 | .983 | .519 | .039 | -.189 | .346 | -.195 | .329 | |
| .518 | .040 | .928 | .000 | .690 | .000 | .812 | .000 | |
| .523 | .037 | .941 | .000 | .756 | .000 | .606 | .001 | |
| -.598 | .015 | -.413 | .112 | .351 | .073 | .442 | .021 | |
| .543 | .030 | .735 | .000 | |||||
N=43
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).
Fig. 3Box-and -whisker plot of browning index (BI) and acrylamide (benchmark level) using as indicator in biscuits and French fries.