| Literature DB >> 35240999 |
Tsion Tadesse1, Nega Assefa2, Hirbo Shore Roba2, Yohannes Baye3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Induction of labor is a process of artificially initiating labor to attain vaginal birth. Despite its vital role in the reduction of maternal mortality, the failure rate of induction and its contributing factors were not well studied in Ethiopia; particularly there was a limited study in the study area. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors associated with failed induction of labor among women undergoing induction at University of Gondar Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Failed induction; Labor; University of Gondar Specialized Hospital; Women
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35240999 PMCID: PMC8892790 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04476-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Socio-demographic characteristics of women undergoing induction at University of Gondar Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020
| Variables | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 30 | 544 | 76.3 |
| > 30 | 169 | 23.7 |
| Urban | 457 | 64.4 |
| Rural | 253 | 35.6 |
| Residence not recorded (missing = 3) | ||
Obstetric related characteristics of women undergoing induction at University of Gondar Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020
| Variables | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Nulliparous | 520 | 72.9 |
| Multiparous | 193 | 27.1 |
| < 2500 g | 157 | 22.5 |
| 2500-3999 g | 499 | 71.5 |
| ≥ 4000 g | 42 | 6.0 |
| Birth weight not recorded (missing = 15) | ||
| ≤ 37 | 252 | 38.0 |
| 38–40 | 263 | 39.7 |
| ≥ 41 | 148 | 22.3 |
| Unknown LNMP (missing = 50) | ||
| ≤ 18 h | 644 | 95.0 |
| > 18 h | 34 | 5.0 |
| Duration not recorded (missing = 35) | ||
| ≤ 5 | 321 | 46.5 |
| > 5 | 370 | 53.5 |
| Bishop score not recorded (missing = 22) | ||
Fig. 1Reasons for induction of labor among women undergoing induction at University of Gondar Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020. Other reasons: Intra-uterine growth restriction, Diabetic Mellitus, and Polyhydramnios. Key: PROM: Premature rupture of membrane, PIH: pregnancy-induced hypertension, APH: antepartum hemorrhage
Fig. 2The different induction methods among women undergoing induction at University of Gondar Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020. Key: ARM: artificial rupture of membrane, IU: International Unit
Fig. 3Modes of delivery among women undergoing induction at University of Gondar Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020. Others; CS for fetal distress, severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, severe vaginal bleeding, failed instrumental delivery, and Cephalo-pelvic disproportion (CPD)
Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of factors associated with failed induction of labor among women undergoing induction at University of Gondar Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020
| Variables | Failed induction of labor | 95% Confidence Interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name and Label | Yes | No | COR | AOR |
| ≤ 30 | 105(19.3%) | 439(80.7%) | 1 | 1 |
| > 30 | 69(40.8%) | 100(59.2%) | 2.9(2.0,4.2)*** | 3.7(2.2,6.2)*** |
| Urban | 65(14.2%) | 392(85.8%) | 1 | 1 |
| Rural | 108(42.7%) | 145(57.3%) | 4.5(3.1,6.5)*** | 3.7(2.4,5.8)*** |
| Nulliparous | 139(26.7%) | 381(73.3%) | 1.6(1.1,2.5)* | 2.1(1.2,3.7)** |
| Multiparous | 35(18.1%) | 158(81.9%) | 1 | 1 |
| < 2500 | 54(34.4%) | 103(65.6%) | 2.0(1.4,2.9)*** | 1.5(0.9,2.5) |
| 2500–3999 | 103(20.6%) | 396(79.4%) | 1 | 1 |
| ≥ 4000 | 15(35.7%) | 27(64.3%) | 2.1(1.1,4.2)* | 1.7(0.7,4.2) |
| ≤ 37 | 69(27.4%) | 183(72.6%) | 1 | |
| 38–40 | 55(20.9%) | 208(79.1%) | 0.7(0.5,1.1) | |
| ≥ 41 | 28(18.9%) | 120(81.1%) | 0.6(0.4,1.0) | |
| ≤ 5 | 120(37.4%) | 201(62.6%) | 4.3(2.9,6.3)*** | 3.4(2.2,5.4)*** |
| > 5 | 45(12.2%) | 325(87.8%) | 1 | 1 |
| ≤ 18 h | 155(24.1%) | 489(75.9%) | 1 | |
| > 18 h | 10(29.4%) | 24(70.6%) | 1.3(0.6,2.8) | |
| No | 149(27.2%) | 398(72.8%) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 15(15.6%) | 81(84.4%) | 0.5(0.3,0.9)* | 1.4(0.7,3.0) |
| No | 93(22.4%) | 322(77.6%) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 71(31.1%) | 157(68.9%) | 1.6(1.1,2.3)* | 2.7(1.5,4.6)*** |
| No | 153(25.7%) | 442(74.3%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 11(22.9%) | 37(77.1%) | 0.9(0.4,1.7) | |
| No | 90(20%) | 359(80%) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 74(38.1%) | 120(61.9%) | 2.5(1.7,3.6)*** | 4.0(2.3,7.1)*** |
| No | 152(24.9%) | 458(75.1%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 12(36.4%) | 21(63.6%) | 1.7(0.8,3.6) | |
| No | 132(25.6%) | 384(74.4) | 1 | |
| Yes | 32(25.2%) | 95(74.8%) | 1.0(0.6,1.5) | |
| No | 136(25.4%) | 400(74.6%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 28(26.2%) | 79(73.8%) | 1.0(0.7,1.7) | |
| No | 153(25.1%) | 456(74.9%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 11(32.4%) | 23(67.6%) | 1.4(0.7,2.9) | |
| Oxytocin infusion only | 138(26%) | 393(74%) | 1 | 1 |
| Misoprostol only | 11(30.6%) | 25(69.4%) | 1.3(0.6,2.6) | |
| ARM with oxytocin | 14(15.2%) | 78(84.8%) | 0.5(0.3,0.9)* | 0.2(0.1,0.4)*** |
| Balloon catheter with oxytocin | 11(20.4%) | 43(79.6%) | 0.7(0.4,1.5) | |
| ≤ 5 IU | 93(26.9%) | 253(73.1%) | 1 | |
| 6-10 IU | 33(20.9%) | 125(79.1%) | 0.7(0.5,1.1) | |
| > 10 IU | 12(44.4%) | 15(55.6%) | 2.2(0.9,4.8) | |
AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio, COR Crude Odds Ratio, 1: Reference category
*Significant at p < 0.25 but > 0.01
**Significant at P = 0.01
***Significant at P = 0.000
| Score | Dilation (cm) | Effacement (%) | Station (cm) | Consistency | Position |
| 0 | Closed | 0–30 | −3 | firm | Posterior |
| 1 | 1 − 2 cm | 40–50 | -2 | Medium | Mid position |
| 2 | 3-4 cm | 60–70 | −1,0 | Soft | Anterior |
| 3 | ≥5 cm | ≥80 | + 1,+ 2 |