Literature DB >> 24565430

Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.

Aaron B Caughey, Alison G Cahill, Jeanne-Marie Guise, Dwight J Rouse.   

Abstract

In 2011, 1 in 3 women who gave birth in the United States did so by cesarean delivery. Cesarean birth can be lifesaving for the fetus, the mother, or both in certain cases. However, the rapid increase in cesarean birth rates from 1996 through 2011 without clear evidence of concomitant decreases in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality raises significant concern that cesarean delivery is overused. Variation in the rates of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean births also indicates that clinical practice patterns affect the number of cesarean births performed. The most common indications for primary cesarean delivery include, in order of frequency, labor dystocia, abnormal or indeterminate (formerly, nonreassuring) fetal heart rate tracing, fetal malpresentation, multiple gestation, and suspected fetal macrosomia. Safe reduction of the rate of primary cesarean deliveries will require different approaches for each of these, as well as other, indications. For example, it may be necessary to revisit the definition of labor dystocia because recent data show that contemporary labor progresses at a rate substantially slower than what was historically taught. Additionally, improved and standardized fetal heart rate interpretation and management may have an effect. Increasing women's access to nonmedical interventions during labor, such as continuous labor and delivery support, also has been shown to reduce cesarean birth rates. External cephalic version for breech presentation and a trial of labor for women with twin gestations when the first twin is in cephalic presentation are other of several examples of interventions that can contribute to the safe lowering of the primary cesarean delivery rate.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24565430     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  170 in total

1.  Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations.

Authors:  Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro; Gláucia M Varella Pereira; Regina Amélia Pessoa Aguiar; Rodrigo Leite Azevedo; Mário Dias Correia-Junior; Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Applying a physiologic partograph to Consortium on Safe Labor data to identify opportunities for safely decreasing cesarean births among nulliparous women.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Aaron B Caughey; Kelly A Bennett; Ellen L Tilden; Nicole S Carlson; Julia C Phillippi; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  A qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences of labor dystocia.

Authors:  Katherine Kissler; Jacqueline Jones; A Kristienne McFarland; Jacalyn Luchsinger
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Overdue: Medicaid and Private Insurance Coverage of Doula Care to Strengthen Maternal and Infant Health.

Authors:  Nan Strauss; Carol Sakala; Maureen P Corry
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2016

5.  Coverage for Doula Services: How State Medicaid Programs Can Address Concerns about Maternity Care Costs and Quality.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Rachel R Hardeman
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 6.  Prevention of the first cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  The impact of variations in obstetric practice on maternal birth trauma.

Authors:  Ixora Kamisan Atan; Shek Ka Lai; Suzanne Langer; Jessica Caudwell-Hall; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Teaching University Students About Evidence-Based Perinatal Care: Effects on Learning and Future Care Preferences.

Authors:  Elizabeth Soliday; Suzanne R Smith
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2017

9.  Determinants of cesarean delivery in the US: a lifecourse approach.

Authors:  Whitney P Witt; Lauren E Wisk; Erika R Cheng; Kara Mandell; Debanjana Chatterjee; Fathima Wakeel; Amy L Godecker; Dakota Zarak
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-01

10.  Association between Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight and the Risk of Cesarean Delivery among Nulliparous Women with Diabetes in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; William A Grobman; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.