Literature DB >> 35239614

New-Generation Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hip Arthroplasty Implants Using Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction: First In Vitro Experience at 0.55 T and Comparison With 1.5 T.

Iman Khodarahmi1, Inge M Brinkmann2, Dana J Lin1, Mary Bruno1, Patricia M Johnson1, Florian Knoll1, Mahesh B Keerthivasan2, Hersh Chandarana1, Jan Fritz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite significant progress, artifact-free visualization of the bone and soft tissues around hip arthroplasty implants remains an unmet clinical need. New-generation low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems now include slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC), which may result in smaller metallic artifacts and better image quality than standard-of-care 1.5 T MRI. This study aims to assess the feasibility of SEMAC on a new-generation 0.55 T system, optimize the pulse protocol parameters, and compare the results with those of a standard-of-care 1.5 T MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Titanium (Ti) and cobalt-chromium total hip arthroplasty implants embedded in a tissue-mimicking American Society for Testing and Materials gel phantom were evaluated using turbo spin echo, view angle tilting (VAT), and combined VAT and SEMAC (VAT + SEMAC) pulse sequences. To refine an MRI protocol at 0.55 T, the type of metal artifact reduction techniques and the effect of various pulse sequence parameters on metal artifacts were assessed through qualitative ranking of the images by 3 expert readers while taking measured spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratios, and acquisition times into consideration. Signal-to-noise ratio efficiency and artifact size of the optimized 0.55 T protocols were compared with the 1.5 T standard and compressed-sensing SEMAC sequences.
RESULTS: Overall, the VAT + SEMAC sequence with at least 6 SEMAC encoding steps for Ti and 9 for cobalt-chromium implants was ranked higher than other sequences for metal reduction ( P < 0.05). Additional SEMAC encoding partitions did not result in further metal artifact reductions. Permitting minimal residual artifacts, low magnetic susceptibility Ti constructs may be sufficiently imaged with optimized turbo spin echo sequences obviating the need for SEMAC. In cross-platform comparison, 0.55 T acquisitions using the optimized protocols are associated with 45% to 64% smaller artifacts than 1.5 T VAT + SEMAC and VAT + compressed-sensing/SEMAC protocols at the expense of a 17% to 28% reduction in signal-to-noise ratio efficiency. B 1 -related artifacts are invariably smaller at 0.55 T than 1.5 T; however, artifacts related to B 0 distortion, although frequently smaller, may appear as signal pileups at 0.55 T.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that new-generation low-field SEMAC MRI reduces metal artifacts around hip arthroplasty implants to better advantage than current 1.5 T MRI standard of care. While the appearance of B 0 -related artifacts changes, reduction in B 1 -related artifacts plays a major role in the overall benefit of 0.55 T.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35239614      PMCID: PMC9363001          DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   10.065


  31 in total

1.  Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI.

Authors:  Kim Butts; John M Pauly; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Overcoming metallic artefacts from orthopaedic wrist volar plating on a low-field MRI scanner.

Authors:  Alessandro Stecco; Roberto Arioli; Francesco Buemi; Giuseppe Parziale; Alessandra Trisoglio; Eleonora Soligo; Paolo Cerini; Massimiliano Leigheb; Marco Brambilla; Gerardo Di Nardo; Giuseppe Guzzardi; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Low-Field MRI-A New Generation of Breakthrough Technology in Clinical Imaging.

Authors:  Rafael Heiss; Armin M Nagel; Frederik B Laun; Michael Uder; Sebastian Bickelhaupt
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Heating of Hip Arthroplasty Implants During Metal Artifact Reduction MRI at 1.5- and 3.0-T Field Strengths.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi; Sunder Rajan; Robert Sterling; Kevin Koch; John Kirsch; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 5.  Leaps in Technology: Advanced MR Imaging after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi; Mathias Nittka; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Opportunities in Interventional and Diagnostic Imaging by Using High-Performance Low-Field-Strength MRI.

Authors:  Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Rajiv Ramasawmy; Matthew C Restivo; Ipshita Bhattacharya; Burcu Basar; Daniel A Herzka; Michael S Hansen; Toby Rogers; W Patricia Bandettini; Delaney R McGuirt; Christine Mancini; David Grodzki; Rainer Schneider; Waqas Majeed; Himanshu Bhat; Hui Xue; Joel Moss; Ashkan A Malayeri; Elizabeth C Jones; Alan P Koretsky; Peter Kellman; Marcus Y Chen; Robert J Lederman; Robert S Balaban
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Needle Heating During Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5- and 3.0-T Field Strengths.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi; Luke W Bonham; Clifford R Weiss; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  The Clinical Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging According to Field Strength, Specifically Addressing the Breadth of Current State-of-the-Art Systems, Which Include 0.55 T, 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T.

Authors:  Val M Runge; Johannes T Heverhagen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Diagnostic abdominal MR imaging on a prototype low-field 0.55 T scanner operating at two different gradient strengths.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Barun Bagga; Chenchan Huang; Bari Dane; Robert Petrocelli; Mary Bruno; Mahesh Keerthivasan; David Grodzki; Kai Tobias Block; David Stoffel; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-20

10.  Metal artifacts of hip arthroplasty implants at 1.5-T and 3.0-T: a closer look into the B1 effects.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi; John Kirsch; Gregory Chang; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  1 in total

1.  A flexible MRI coil based on a cable conductor and applied to knee imaging.

Authors:  Bili Wang; Syed S Siddiq; Jerzy Walczyk; Mary Bruno; Iman Khodarahmi; Inge M Brinkmann; Robert Rehner; Karthik Lakshmanan; Jan Fritz; Ryan Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.