Literature DB >> 35239166

Self-report and facial expression indicators of team cohesion development.

Justin W Bonny1.   

Abstract

Ad hoc teams are formed to complete tasks across formal and informal environments. More effective teams tend to report higher cohesion, more strongly identifying as a group. Dynamic theories of team processes suggest that cohesion changes as teams form and perform to achieve a goal. The present research examined approaches for rapidly measuring team dynamics to investigate how cohesion developed in newly formed teams as they completed a series of video game matches. Self-report ratings of cohesion were collected via manikin-based measures designed to be rapidly completed. In addition, the emotion valence and arousal of facial expressions of teammates were estimated via video recordings. Results suggested that perceptions of cohesion rapidly changed as teams completed video game matches. The present study indicates that manikin-based self-report measures and emotion valence of facial expressions are dynamic and could be used as behavioral indicators of team cohesion development.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohesion; Emotion; Facial expressions; Teams; Video games

Year:  2022        PMID: 35239166     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01799-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  13 in total

1.  Team cohesion and team success in sport.

Authors:  Albert V Carron; Steven R Bray; Mark A Eys
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.337

2.  Emotional contagion in soccer penalty shootouts: celebration of individual success is associated with ultimate team success.

Authors:  Tjerk Moll; Geir Jordet; Gert-Jan Pepping
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 3.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models.

Authors:  Daniel R Ilgen; John R Hollenbeck; Michael Johnson; Dustin Jundt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Informal social communication.

Authors:  L FESTINGER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-09       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.

Authors:  Steve W J Kozlowski; Daniel R Ilgen
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2006-12-01

6.  Multi-agency operations: cooperation during flooding.

Authors:  Richard McMaster; Chris Baber
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions.

Authors:  P J Lang; M K Greenwald; M M Bradley; A O Hamm
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.

Authors:  M M Bradley; P J Lang
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03

Review 9.  Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Ralph Adolphs; Stacy Marsella; Aleix M Martinez; Seth D Pollak
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2019-07

10.  On the interpretation of synchronization in EEG hyperscanning studies: a cautionary note.

Authors:  Adrian P Burgess
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.