Andrea F Kalvesmaki1,2, Alec B Chapman1,2,3, Kelly S Peterson1,2,4, Mary Jo Pugh1,2, Makoto Jones1,2, Theresa C Gleason5. 1. Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 2. Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 3. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 4. Veteran Health Administration Office of Analytics and Performance Integration. 5. Department of Veteran Affairs, Clinical Science Research & Development Service (CSRD), Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Analyze responses to a national request for information (RFI) to uncover gaps in policy, practice, and understanding of veteran suicide to inform federal research strategy. DATA SOURCE: An RFI with 21 open-ended questions generated from Presidential Executive Order #1386, administered nationally from July 3 to August 5, 2019. STUDY DESIGN: Semi-structured, open-ended responses analyzed using a collaborative qualitative and text-mining data process. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We aligned traditional qualitative methods with natural language processing (NLP) text-mining techniques to analyze 9040 open-ended question responses from 722 respondents to provide results within 3 months. Narrative inquiry and the medical explanatory model guided the data extraction and analytic process. RESULTS: Five major themes were identified: risk factors, risk assessment, prevention and intervention, barriers to care, and data/research. Individuals and organizations mentioned different concepts within the same themes. In responses about risk factors, individuals frequently mentioned generic terms like "illness" while organizations mentioned specific terms like "traumatic brain injury." Organizations and individuals described unique barriers to care and emphasized ways to integrate data and research to improve points of care. Organizations often identified lack of funding as barriers while individuals often identified key moments for prevention such as military transitions and ensuring care providers have military cultural understanding. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an example of a rapid, adaptive analysis of a large body of qualitative, public response data about veteran suicide to support a federal strategy for an important public health topic. Combining qualitative and text-mining methods allowed a representation of voices and perspectives including the lived experiences of individuals who described stories of military transition, treatments that worked or did not, and the perspective of organizations treating veterans for suicide. The results supported the development of a national strategy to reduce suicide risks for veterans as well as civilians.
OBJECTIVE: Analyze responses to a national request for information (RFI) to uncover gaps in policy, practice, and understanding of veteran suicide to inform federal research strategy. DATA SOURCE: An RFI with 21 open-ended questions generated from Presidential Executive Order #1386, administered nationally from July 3 to August 5, 2019. STUDY DESIGN: Semi-structured, open-ended responses analyzed using a collaborative qualitative and text-mining data process. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We aligned traditional qualitative methods with natural language processing (NLP) text-mining techniques to analyze 9040 open-ended question responses from 722 respondents to provide results within 3 months. Narrative inquiry and the medical explanatory model guided the data extraction and analytic process. RESULTS: Five major themes were identified: risk factors, risk assessment, prevention and intervention, barriers to care, and data/research. Individuals and organizations mentioned different concepts within the same themes. In responses about risk factors, individuals frequently mentioned generic terms like "illness" while organizations mentioned specific terms like "traumatic brain injury." Organizations and individuals described unique barriers to care and emphasized ways to integrate data and research to improve points of care. Organizations often identified lack of funding as barriers while individuals often identified key moments for prevention such as military transitions and ensuring care providers have military cultural understanding. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an example of a rapid, adaptive analysis of a large body of qualitative, public response data about veteran suicide to support a federal strategy for an important public health topic. Combining qualitative and text-mining methods allowed a representation of voices and perspectives including the lived experiences of individuals who described stories of military transition, treatments that worked or did not, and the perspective of organizations treating veterans for suicide. The results supported the development of a national strategy to reduce suicide risks for veterans as well as civilians.
Authors: Craig J Bryan; Jim Mintz; Tracy A Clemans; Bruce Leeson; T Scott Burch; Sean R Williams; Emily Maney; M David Rudd Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Mark A Reger; Derek J Smolenski; Nancy A Skopp; Melinda J Metzger-Abamukang; Han K Kang; Tim A Bullman; Sondra Perdue; Gregory A Gahm Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Rick Bonney; Jennifer L Shirk; Tina B Phillips; Andrea Wiggins; Heidi L Ballard; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Julia K Parrish Journal: Science Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Benjamin L Cook; Ana M Progovac; Pei Chen; Brian Mullin; Sherry Hou; Enrique Baca-Garcia Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 2.238
Authors: Andrea F Kalvesmaki; Alec B Chapman; Kelly S Peterson; Mary Jo Pugh; Makoto Jones; Theresa C Gleason Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 3.734