| Literature DB >> 35237635 |
Alessandro Gambella1, Enrico Costantino Falco1, Giacomo Benazzo1, Simona Osella-Abate2, Rebecca Senetta3, Isabella Castellano1, Luca Bertero1, Paola Cassoni1.
Abstract
The management of endoscopically resected pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC) relies on nodal metastasis risk estimation based on the assessment of specific histopathological features. Avoiding the overtreatment of metastasis-free patients represents a crucial unmet clinical need. By analyzing a consecutive series of 207 pT1 CRCs treated with colectomy and lymphadenectomy, this study aimed to develop a novel clinicopathological score to improve pT1 CRC metastasis prediction. First, we established the clinicopathological profile of metastatic cases: lymphovascular invasion (OR: 23.8; CI: 5.12-110.9) and high-grade tumor budding (OR: 5.21; CI: 1.60-16.8) correlated with an increased risk of nodal metastasis, while age at diagnosis >65 years (OR: 0.26; CI: 0.09-0.71) and high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (OR: 0.19; CI: 0.06-0.59) showed a protective effect. Combining these features, we built a five-tier risk score that, applied to our series, identified cases with a higher risk (score ≥ 2) of nodal metastasis (OR: 7.7; CI: 2.4-24.4). Notably, a score of 0 was only assigned to cases with no metastases (13/13 cases) and all the score 4 samples (2/2 cases) showed nodal metastases. In conclusion, we developed an effectively combined score to assess pT1 CRC nodal metastasis risk. We believe that its adoption within a multidisciplinary pT1 unit could improve patients' clinical management and limit surgical overtreatment.Entities:
Keywords: age at diagnosis; colorectal carcinoma; lymph node metastasis; lymphovascular invasion; pT1; predictive score; tumor budding; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Year: 2022 PMID: 35237635 PMCID: PMC8882765 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.837876
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Histopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis in pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC). (A) High-grade tumor budding represented by equal or more than five clusters of less than five tumor cells at the invasive front of the tumor (black arrows) (original magnification: 200X); (B) Tumor cells invasion of peritumoral stromal vessels representing lymphovascular invasion (original magnification: 100X); (C) Absent/mild tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes surrounding tumor cells (original magnification: 100X); (D) High tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes facing the invasive tumor front (original magnification: 100X).
Figure 2Representative images of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (original magnification 200x). (A) “Absent TILs” cases presented no lymphocytes at the invasive front of tumor; (B) “mild TILs” cases showed scattering lymphocytes partially surrounding tumor cells; (C) “high TILs” cases presented several lymphocytes continuously outlining tumor cells at the invasive tumor front and extending in the surrounding stroma; (D) lymphocytes located in superficial tumor layers were not considered, as well as lymphocytes within the tumor bulk.
Clinical and histopathological variables evaluated in our study.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 93 | 44.9 |
| Female | 114 | 55.1 | |
| Age | Median (interval) | 70 (37–90) | – |
| Age | <65 | 66 | 31.9 |
| ≥65 | 141 | 68.1 | |
| Morphology | Non pedunculated | 177 | 85.5 |
| Pedunculated | 30 | 14.5 | |
| Site | Cecum-Right | 69 | 33.3 |
| Transverse | 14 | 6.8 | |
| Left | 11 | 5.3 | |
| Sigmoid-rectum | 113 | 54.6 | |
| Sigmoid | 67 | 32.4 | |
| Rectum | 46 | 22.2 | |
| Simultaneous polyps | Absent | 165 | 79.7 |
| Present | 42 | 20.3 | |
| Grade | Well differentiated (G1) | 31 | 15.0 |
| Moderately differentiated (G2) | 169 | 81.6 | |
| Poorly differentiated (G3) | 7 | 3.4 | |
| Mucinous feature | Absent | 173 | 83.6 |
| Present | 34 | 16.4 | |
| Lymphovascular | Absent | 199 | 96.1 |
| invasion | Present | 8 | 3.9 |
| TILs | Absent | 24 | 11.6 |
| Mild | 165 | 79.7 | |
| High | 18 | 8.7 | |
| Tumor budding | Low-grade | 189 | 91.3 |
| High-grade | 18 | 8.7 | |
| Sampled lymph nodes | <12 | 88 | 42.5 |
| ≥12 | 119 | 57.5 | |
| Lymph nodes | Absent | 189 | 91.3 |
| metastasis | Present | 18 | 8.7 |
| Growth pattern | Expansive | 73 | 35.3 |
| Infiltrative | 134 | 64.7 | |
| Depth of invasion | <1 mm | 22 | 10.6 |
| ≥1 mm | 185 | 89.4 | |
| Width of invasion | <4 mm | 44 | 21.3 |
| ≥4 mm | 163 | 78.7 | |
Figure 3Graphical representation of our study.
Distribution of clinical data and pathological features based on lymph nodes metastasis.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |||
| Gender | Male | 93 | 106 | 8 | 0.343 |
| Female | 114 | 83 | 10 | ||
| Age | Median (interval) | 70 (37–90) | 70 (43–90) | 62 (37–85) | 0.025 |
| Age | <65 | 66 | 55 | 11 | 0.005 |
| ≥65 | 141 | 134 | 7 | ||
| Morphology | Non pedunculated | 177 | 164 | 13 | 0.094 |
| Pedunculated | 30 | 25 | 5 | ||
| Site | Cecum-Right | 69 | 63 | 6 | 0.997 |
| Transverse | 14 | 13 | 1 | ||
| Left | 11 | 10 | 1 | ||
| Sigmoid-rectum | 113 | 103 | 10 | ||
| Simultaneous polyps | Absent | 165 | 150 | 15 | 0.689 |
| Present | 42 | 39 | 3 | ||
| Mucinous feature | Absent | 34 | 31 | 3 | 0.635 |
| Present | 173 | 158 | 15 | ||
| Lymphovascular | Absent | 199 | 186 | 13 | <0.001 |
| Present | 8 | 3 | 5 | ||
| TILs | Absent | 24 | 18 | 6 | 0.006 |
| Mild | 165 | 153 | 12 | ||
| High | 18 | 18 | 0 | ||
| Tumor budding | Low-grade | 189 | 176 | 13 | 0.003 |
| High-grade | 18 | 13 | 5 | ||
| Sampled lymphnodes | <12 | 88 | 79 | 9 | 0.236 |
| ≥12 | 119 | 110 | 9 | ||
| Growth pattern | Expansive | 73 | 70 | 3 | 0.084 |
| Infiltrative | 134 | 119 | 15 | ||
| Depth of invasion | <1 mm | 22 | 20 | 2 | 0.945 |
| ≥1 mm | 185 | 169 | 16 | ||
| Width of invasion | <4 mm | 44 | 42 | 2 | 0.271 |
| ≥4 mm | 163 | 147 | 16 | ||
Univariate logistic regression analysis between clinico-pathological variables and lymph nodes metastasis.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (Male vs. Female) | 1.59 | 0.60–4.22 | 0.346 |
| Age (linear) | 0.93 | 0.88–0.97 | 0.003 |
| Age (>65-year-old) | 0.26 | 0.09–0.71 | 0.008 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 23.8 | 5.12–110.9 | <0.001 |
| High-grade tumor budding | 5.21 | 1.60–16.8 | 0.006 |
| High TILs | 0.19 | 0.06–0.59 | 0.004 |
| Pedunculated morphology | 2.52 | 0.82–7.68 | 0.103 |
| Grading | 2.28 | 0.63–8.29 | 0.210 |
| Sampled lymph nodes >12 | 0.72 | 0.27–1.89 | 0.503 |
| Sigmoid-rectum site | 1.04 | 0.39–2.76 | 0.931 |
Correlation analysis between the score group and presence of lymph node metastasis.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| 0 | 13 | 0 | <0.001 |
| 1 | 117 | 4 | |
| 2 | 54 | 9 | |
| 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | 2 | |
Correlation analysis clustering cases with score <2 vs. score ≥2.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| 0–1 | 130 | 4 | <0.001 |
| 2–4 | 59 | 14 | |
Univariate logistic regression evaluating our score outcomes predicting lymph node metastasis.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score group | Score 2–4 vs. score 0–1 | 7.71 | 2.4–24.4 | 0.001 |
| (clustered score) |
Correlation analysis between the score groups and presence of lymph nodes metastasis in the N+ plus N0 with >12 lymph nodes subgroup.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| 0 | 7 | 0 | <0.001 |
| 1 | 71 | 4 | |
| 2 | 29 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0–1 | 78 | 4 | <0.001 |
| 2–4 | 32 | 14 | |
Univariate logistic regression evaluating the association between the score groups and lymph node metastasis in the N+ plus N0 with >12 lymph nodes cases.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score group | Score 2–4 vs. score 0–1 | 8,2 | 2.5–26.7 | 0.001 |
| (clustered score) |