Literature DB >> 23784448

Impact of screening colonoscopy on outcomes in colon cancer surgery.

Ramzi Amri1, Liliana G Bordeianou, Patricia Sylla, David L Berger.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Screening colonoscopy seemingly decreases colorectal cancer rates in the United States. In addition to removing benign lesions and preventing progression to malignancy, screening colonoscopy theoretically identifies asymptomatic patients with early-stage disease, potentially leading to higher survival rates.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of screening colonoscopy on outcomes of colon cancer surgery by reviewing differences in staging, disease-free interval, risk of recurrence, and survival and to identify whether diagnosis through screening improves long-term outcomes independent of staging.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved database.
SETTING: Tertiary care center with high patient volume. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent colon cancer surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2011. INTERVENTION: Colon cancer surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Postoperative staging, death, and recurrence, measured as incidence and time to event.
RESULTS: A total of 1071 patients were included, with 217 diagnosed through screening. Patients not diagnosed through screening were at risk for a more invasive tumor (≥T3: relative risk [RR] = 1.96; P < .001), nodal disease (RR = 1.92; P < .001), and metastatic disease on presentation (RR = 3.37; P < .001). In follow-up, these patients had higher death rates (RR = 3.02; P < .001) and recurrence rates (RR = 2.19; P = .004) as well as shorter survival (P < .001) and disease-free intervals (P < .001). Cox and logistic regression controlling for staging and baseline characteristics revealed that death rate (P = .02) and survival duration (P = .01) were better stage for stage with diagnosis through screening. Death and metastasis rates also remained significantly lower in tumors without nodal or metastatic spread (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients with colon cancer identified on screening colonoscopy not only have lower-stage disease on presentation but also have better outcomes independent of their staging. Compliance to screening colonoscopy guidelines can play an important role in prolonging longevity, improving quality of life, and reducing health care costs through early detection of colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23784448     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  30 in total

Review 1.  Data-Powered Participatory Decision Making: Leveraging Systems Thinking and Simulation to Guide Selection and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Jennifer Leeman; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Florence K L Tangka; Melinda M Davis; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Detrimental impact of symptom-detected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lieve G J Leijssen; Anne M Dinaux; Hiroko Kunitake; Liliana G Bordeianou; David L Berger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Need for an Integrated Patient Navigation Pathway to Improve Access to Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Safety-Net Hospital Experience.

Authors:  Sreedevi Thamarasseril; Taft Bhuket; Chuck Chan; Benny Liu; Robert J Wong
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  Narrow Band Imaging, Magnifying Chromoendoscopy, and Gross Morphological Features for the Optical Diagnosis of T1 Colorectal Cancer and Deep Submucosal Invasion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Y Backes; A Moss; J B Reitsma; P D Siersema; L M G Moons
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Screening or Symptoms? How Do We Detect Colorectal Cancer in an Equal Access Health Care System?

Authors:  Quinton M Hatch; Kevin R Kniery; Eric K Johnson; Shelly A Flores; David L Moeil; John J Thompson; Justin A Maykel; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Postoperative Outcomes of Screen-Detected vs Non-Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Michael P M de Neree Tot Babberich; Nina C A Vermeer; Michel W J M Wouters; Wilhelmina M U van Grevenstein; Koen C M J Peeters; Evelien Dekker; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 7.  Management of colorectal cancer presenting with synchronous liver metastases.

Authors:  Ajith K Siriwardena; James M Mason; Saifee Mullamitha; Helen C Hancock; Santhalingam Jegatheeswaran
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Improved survival of patients with colon cancer detected by screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Armin Wiegering; Sabine Ackermann; Johannes Riegel; Ulrich A Dietz; Oliver Götze; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Ingo Klein
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Current Aspects.

Authors:  John K Triantafillidis; Constantine Vagianos; George Malgarinos
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-04-12

10.  Colorectal Cancer Identification Methods Among Kansas Medicare Beneficiaries, 2008-2010.

Authors:  Sue-Min Lai; Jessica Jungk; Sarma Garimella
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.