Literature DB >> 25620664

The Ueno method for substaging pT1 colorectal adenocarcinoma by depth and width measurement: an interobserver study.

L M Wang1, R Guy2, E Fryer1, C Kartsonaki3, P Gill1, C Hughes1, A Szuts1, R Perera1, R Chetty1, N Mortensen2.   

Abstract

AIM: Early pT1 polyp colorectal cancers (CRCs) present challenges for accurate pathology substaging. Haggitt and Kikuchi stages depend on polyp morphology and are often difficult to apply due to suboptimal orientation or fragmentation, or absence of the muscularis propria in polypectomy or submucosal resection specimens. European guidelines for quality assurance suggest using Ueno's more objective approach, using depth and width measurements beyond muscularis mucosae. We have investigated interobserver variation using Ueno's approach.
METHOD: Ten consecutive pT1 polyp CRCs were identified and the slides assessed by six gastrointestinal pathologists for depth and width of invasion. A further 60 polyps were studied by a group of specialist and general pathologists. Agreement was assessed by analysis of variance. A polyp CRC is classified as high risk if it has a depth ≥ 2000 μm or a width ≥ 4000 μm and low risk with a depth < 2000 μm or a width < 4000 μm. Concordance for the dichotomized values was assessed using the kappa statistic.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for depth was 0.83 and for width 0.56 in the 10-polyp group. The ICC for the 60-polyp CRCs was 0.67 for depth and 0.37 for width. In both groups, when polyp CRCs are divided into high- and low-risk categories based on depth, there was substantial and moderate agreement (κ = 0.80 and 0.47) but only fair agreement when based on width (κ = 0.34 and 0.35).
CONCLUSION: Ueno's method has the advantage of being independent of polyp morphology. Our study shows better concordance for depth measurement and reproducibility in nonfragmented specimens, with poorer agreement when based on width. Colorectal Disease
© 2015 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malignant colorectal polyp; depth and width measurement; polyp pT1 colorectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25620664     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  3 in total

1.  Interobserver variability amongst gastrointestinal pathologists in assessing prognostic parameters of malignant colorectal polyps: a cause for concern.

Authors:  A Davenport; J Morris; S A Pritchard; E Salmo; M Scott; N Y Haboubi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  The Importance of Being "That" Colorectal pT1: A Combined Clinico-Pathological Predictive Score to Improve Nodal Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Alessandro Gambella; Enrico Costantino Falco; Giacomo Benazzo; Simona Osella-Abate; Rebecca Senetta; Isabella Castellano; Luca Bertero; Paola Cassoni
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 3.  The histomorphological and molecular landscape of colorectal adenomas and serrated lesions.

Authors:  Francesca Galuppini; Matteo Fassan; Luca Mastracci; Roberta Gafà; Marcello Lo Mele; Stefano Lazzi; Andrea Remo; Paola Parente; Alessandro D'Amuri; Claudia Mescoli; Fabiana Tatangelo; Giovanni Lanza
Journal:  Pathologica       Date:  2021-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.