Literature DB >> 35236987

Overcoming universal restrictions on metal selectivity by protein design.

Tae Su Choi1, F Akif Tezcan2.   

Abstract

Selective metal coordination is central to the functions of metalloproteins:1,2 each metalloprotein must pair with its cognate metallocofactor to fulfil its biological role3. However, achieving metal selectivity solely through a three-dimensional protein structure is a great challenge, because there is a limited set of metal-coordinating amino acid functionalities and proteins are inherently flexible, which impedes steric selection of metals3,4. Metal-binding affinities of natural proteins are primarily dictated by the electronic properties of metal ions and follow the Irving-Williams series5 (Mn2+ < Fe2+ < Co2+ < Ni2+ < Cu2+ > Zn2+) with few exceptions6,7. Accordingly, metalloproteins overwhelmingly bind Cu2+ and Zn2+ in isolation, regardless of the nature of their active sites and their cognate metal ions1,3,8. This led organisms to evolve complex homeostatic machinery and non-equilibrium strategies to achieve correct metal speciation1,3,8-10. Here we report an artificial dimeric protein, (AB)2, that thermodynamically overcomes the Irving-Williams restrictions in vitro and in cells, favouring the binding of lower-Irving-Williams transition metals over Cu2+, the most dominant ion in the Irving-Williams series. Counter to the convention in molecular design of achieving specificity through structural preorganization, (AB)2 was deliberately designed to be flexible. This flexibility enabled (AB)2 to adopt mutually exclusive, metal-dependent conformational states, which led to the discovery of structurally coupled coordination sites that disfavour Cu2+ ions by enforcing an unfavourable coordination geometry. Aside from highlighting flexibility as a valuable element in protein design, our results illustrate design principles for constructing selective metal sequestration agents.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35236987      PMCID: PMC9157509          DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04469-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   69.504


  54 in total

Review 1.  Metallochaperones, an intracellular shuttle service for metal ions.

Authors:  T V O'Halloran; V C Culotta
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-08-18       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Metalloregulatory proteins: metal selectivity and allosteric switching.

Authors:  Hermes Reyes-Caballero; Gregory C Campanello; David P Giedroc
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 3.  Competition among metal ions for protein binding sites: determinants of metal ion selectivity in proteins.

Authors:  Todor Dudev; Carmay Lim
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  De Novo Design of Four-Helix Bundle Metalloproteins: One Scaffold, Diverse Reactivities.

Authors:  Angela Lombardi; Fabio Pirro; Ornella Maglio; Marco Chino; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 5.  How do bacterial cells ensure that metalloproteins get the correct metal?

Authors:  Kevin J Waldron; Nigel J Robinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Key Structural Motifs Balance Metal Binding and Oxidative Reactivity in a Heterobimetallic Mn/Fe Protein.

Authors:  Effie C Kisgeropoulos; Julia J Griese; Zachary R Smith; Rui M M Branca; Camille R Schneider; Martin Högbom; Hannah S Shafaat
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Design of functional metalloproteins.

Authors:  Yi Lu; Natasha Yeung; Nathan Sieracki; Nicholas M Marshall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Metalloproteins and metal sensing.

Authors:  Kevin J Waldron; Julian C Rutherford; Dianne Ford; Nigel J Robinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Protein-folding location can regulate manganese-binding versus copper- or zinc-binding.

Authors:  Steve Tottey; Kevin J Waldron; Susan J Firbank; Brian Reale; Conrad Bessant; Katsuko Sato; Timothy R Cheek; Joe Gray; Mark J Banfield; Christopher Dennison; Nigel J Robinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Bacillus anthracis class Ib ribonucleotide reductase subunit NrdF intrinsically selects manganese over iron.

Authors:  Kristīne Grāve; Julia J Griese; Gustav Berggren; Matthew D Bennett; Martin Högbom
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.358

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.