| Literature DB >> 35236817 |
Shuai Liu1, Chuanli Yang1, Hongxia Li1, Xinshu Bai1, Tianjiao Hu1, Xin Xue1, Jie An1, Yan Zhang1, Xiushan Dong1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic constipation is a common gastrointestinal disease. Our previous studies confirmed that there are differences in the composition and function of gut microbiota between women of reproductive age with chronic constipation and healthy controls. However, little is known about the differences in the metabolic profile of the 2 groups. The aim of this study was to observe changes in serum metabolites and identify potential metabolic pathways in the development of chronic constipation. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 50 participants were included in this study: 25 female patients of childbearing age with chronic constipation who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and 25 healthy participants as a control group. Serum samples of these participants were collected; 1 portion of the serum sample was used for clinical biochemical analysis, and the other was used for non-targeted metabolomic testing. RESULTS Compared with the control group, serum 2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid levels were higher (P<0.05) and DL-phenylalanine levels were lower (P<0.05) in the constipation group. Other amino acids, such as 5-hydroxy-l-lysine and l-pipecolic acid, were upregulated, and L-valine, glycine, L-leucyl-L-proline, and N-formylmethionine were downregulated in the constipation group. In addition, levels of the bile acid, 3b-hydroxy-5-cholenoic acid, were higher in the constipation group than in the control group. Pathway analysis showed that the significantly altered pathways were phenylalanine metabolism and glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism. CONCLUSIONS These results strongly suggest that serum metabolites and pathways are significantly altered in women of reproductive age with chronic constipation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35236817 PMCID: PMC8902841 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Differences in body mass index and blood biochemical indicators between patients with constipation and healthy controls.
| Indexes | N | C | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | 22.10±1.94 | 21.87±2.90 | 0.367 | 0.715 |
| FBG | 4.91±0.31 | 4.92±0.55 | 0.052 | 0.959 |
| ALT | 15.378±6.16 | 14.57±6.94 | 0.474 | 0.637 |
| AST | 21.00±7.40 | 20.44±7.88 | 0.282 | 0.779 |
| TBIL | 12.07±3.78 | 11.17±4.28 | 0.863 | 0.392 |
| DBIL | 2.65±0.75 | 2.26±0.87 | 1.882 | 0.065 |
| IBIL | 9.42±3.10 | 8.91±3.48 | 0.595 | 0.554 |
| ALB | 44.30±2.05 | 45.00±6.50 | −0.568 | 0.572 |
| TBA | 2.70±1.63 | 2.72±1.41 | −0.042 | 0.966 |
| CHO | 3.97±0.70 | 4.24±0.76 | −1.458 | 0.150 |
| TG | 0.94±0.47 | 1.15±1.04 | −1.026 | 0.309 |
| HDL | 1.43±0.32 | 1.41±0.27 | 0.220 | 0.826 |
| LDL | 2.22±0.47 | 2.41±0.53 | −1.475 | 0.146 |
Figure 1Principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) score plots of constipated patients and healthy controls. (A) PCA score plot for patients with constipation vs healthy controls (SIMCA, version 15.0.2, Sartorius Stedim Data Analytics AB, Umea, Sweden). (B) OPLS-DA score plot for patients with constipation vs healthy controls in integrated ion mode (SIMCA). (C) Permutation test of the OPLS-DA model (SIMCA). The slope of R2 is >0 and the Y-intercept of Q2 is <0.05, indicating a valid model.
Differences in upregulated metabolites between patients with constipation and healthy controls.
| MS2 name | C | N | VIP | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid | 1.981 | 0.870 | 2.093 | 0.010 |
| 1,7-Dimethylxanthine | 1.661 | 0.887 | 1.961 | 0.021 |
| 2-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | 2.234 | 0.968 | 1.126 | 0.010 |
| 3b-Hydroxy-5-cholenoic acid | 2.229 | 1.249 | 2.133 | 0.014 |
| 3-Indoleacetonitrile | 1.626 | 1.470 | 2.445 | 0.032 |
| 5-Hydroxy-L-lysine | 1.054 | 0.856 | 1.815 | 0.017 |
| Cyanuric acid | 1.096 | 0.893 | 1.779 | 0.042 |
| Erythrono-1,4-lactone | 1.112 | 0.919 | 1.478 | 0.044 |
| Flavin mononucleotide (FMN) | 1.254 | 0.822 | 2.341 | 0.016 |
| Gly-Val | 1.000 | 0.849 | 1.358 | 0.029 |
| Hesperetin | 1.078 | 0.749 | 2.273 | 0.015 |
| Hippuric acid | 1.254 | 0.581 | 2.697 | 0.007 |
| Ile-Ala | 0.807 | 0.593 | 1.925 | 0.011 |
| Ile-Pro | 1.050 | 0.880 | 1.307 | 0.049 |
| L-Gulonic gamma-lactone | 1.185 | 0.945 | 2.542 | 0.009 |
| L-Pipecolic acid | 1.158 | 0.927 | 1.238 | 0.025 |
| Propylene glycol | 0.929 | 0.526 | 1.606 | 0.039 |
| Pyrrolidine | 1.182 | 0.804 | 2.553 | 0.005 |
| Saccharin | 1.175 | 0.796 | 1.613 | 0.037 |
| Sinigrin | 0.817 | 0.664 | 1.850 | 0.015 |
Differences in downregulated metabolites between patients with constipation and healthy controls.
| MS2 name | C | N | VIP | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| .gamma.-L-Glu-.epsilon.-L-Lys | 0.747 | 0.980 | 1.451 | 0.047 |
| 11-Keto-.beta.-boswellic acid | 0.646 | 0.811 | 1.568 | 0.049 |
| 12-Oxo-2,3-dinor-10,15-phytodienoic acid | 0.950 | 1.229 | 2.643 | 0.026 |
| 1-Aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid | 1.035 | 1.181 | 2.341 | 0.007 |
| 20-HETE | 2.350 | 3.920 | 2.913 | 0.001 |
| 3-Mercaptopyruvic acid | 1.092 | 2.194 | 1.211 | 0.041 |
| 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-Naphthoic Acid | 0.882 | 1.356 | 2.192 | 0.029 |
| 5-Methyl-5,6-Dihydrouracil | 1.184 | 1.386 | 1.821 | 0.029 |
| Adenine | 0.985 | 1.132 | 1.841 | 0.041 |
| Ala-Lys | 0.763 | 1.230 | 2.044 | 0.049 |
| alpha-Guanidinoglutaric Acid | 1.130 | 1.570 | 2.627 | 0.009 |
| Benzylbutylphthalate | 0.688 | 0.955 | 2.116 | 0.046 |
| D-Alanyl-D-alanine (D-Ala-D-Ala) | 0.796 | 1.241 | 2.088 | 0.031 |
| Desipramine | 1.018 | 1.181 | 1.662 | 0.039 |
| DL-Phenylalanine | 0.647 | 1.064 | 2.231 | 0.014 |
| Glycine | 0.955 | 1.284 | 2.392 | 0.007 |
| Gly-Ser | 1.323 | 1.465 | 1.929 | 0.019 |
| Jasmine lactone | 1.534 | 1.934 | 1.891 | 0.018 |
| Lanosterol | 1.187 | 1.415 | 2.059 | 0.030 |
| Larixinic Acid | 0.783 | 1.083 | 1.893 | 0.021 |
| L-leucyl-L-proline | 1.449 | 3.674 | 1.502 | 0.028 |
| L-Pyroglutamic acid | 1.366 | 2.002 | 1.990 | 0.023 |
| L-Valine | 0.814 | 1.162 | 1.839 | 0.033 |
| Met-Ala | 1.016 | 1.768 | 2.181 | 0.030 |
| N-Acetyl-L-glutamic acid | 1.117 | 1.677 | 1.940 | 0.028 |
| N-Formylmethionine | 1.496 | 2.408 | 1.927 | 0.023 |
| Phosphorylcholine | 0.963 | 1.132 | 1.758 | 0.029 |
| Primidone | 0.890 | 1.701 | 3.274 | 0.000 |
| Tripelennamine | 0.757 | 1.403 | 3.252 | 0.005 |
| Tyr-Ala | 0.636 | 1.314 | 2.296 | 0.018 |
Figure 2(A, B) Heatmap (R software & Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) website (https://www.kegg.jp/)) and volcano plot (SIMCA, version 15.0.2, Sartorius Stedim Data Analytics AB, Umea, Sweden) of metabolites with different levels between patients with constipation and healthy controls. Twenty metabolites had higher levels and 30 metabolites had lower levels in patients with constipation than in healthy controls.
Figure 3Pathway analysis of metabolites with differences between patients with constipation and healthy controls (R software & MetaboAnalyst website (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/)). Seven significantly altered metabolic pathways were identified, including phenylalanine metabolism; caffeine metabolism; and glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism.