| Literature DB >> 35235140 |
Marwa Mohamed Atef1, Marwa Nagy Emam2, Rehab E Abo El Gheit2, Eman M Elbeltagi3, H A Alshenawy4, Doaa A Radwan5, Reham L Younis2, Rania Nagi Abd-Ellatif6.
Abstract
Geraniol (GE), an important ingredient in several essential oils, displayed pleiotropic biological activities through targeting multiple signaling cascades. In the current study, we aimed to examine the protective effect of GE on D-galactose (D-gal) induced cognitive impairment and explore the underlying mechanisms. Forty male Wistar rats (8 weeks old) were randomly categorized into 4 groups; Group I (saline + vehicle [edible oil]), group II (saline + geraniol) (100 mg/kg/day orally), group III (D-galactose) (100 mg/kg/day subcutaneously injected), and group IV (D-galactose + geraniol). Behavioral impairments were evaluated. Brain levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) as well as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and acetylcholinesterase (AchE) activities were estimated. The levels of inflammatory markers [tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-kβ)], endoplasmic reticulum stress sensors [inositol requiring protein 1(IRE1) and protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK)], brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway were measured by ELISA. Also, hippocampal histopathological assessment and immunohistochemical analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and caspase-3 were performed. Glucose regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) mRNA expression and protein levels were assessed. GE effectively ameliorated aging-related memory impairment through increasing GSH, BDNF, Ach levels, and SOD activity. Additionally, GE treatment caused a decrease in the levels of MDA, inflammatory mediators, and ER stress sensors as well as the AchE activity together with concomitant down-regulation of GRP78 and CHOP mRNA expression. Moreover, GE improved neuronal architecture and rat's spatial memory; this is evidenced by the shortened escape latency and increased platform crossing number. Therefore, GE offers a unique pharmacological approach for aging-associated neurodegenerative disorders.Entities:
Keywords: D-Galactose; ER stress; Geraniol; Memory impairment; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35235140 PMCID: PMC9124169 DOI: 10.1007/s11064-022-03559-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurochem Res ISSN: 0364-3190 Impact factor: 4.414
Fig. 1Simple schematic representation of the experimental protocol
Effect of geraniol treatment on behavioural tests in all the studied groups
| Groups/parameters | Morris water maze test | Open field test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escape latency (s) | No. of platform crossing | Total rearing/5 min | Squares crossed in 5 min | |
| Group I (control group) | 12.61 ± 1.8 | 3.83 ± 0.56 | 15.8 ± 2.72 | 62.55 ± 11.27 |
| Group II (geraniol group) | 12.19 ± 1.62 | 3.7 ± 0.54 | 15.53 ± 2.7 | 61.8 ± 11.3 |
| Group III ( | 20.82 ± 2.95*,# | 1.33 ± 0.44*,# | 8.78 ± 1.44*,# | 37.33 ± 6.01*,# |
| Group IV ( | 13.1 ± 2.44& | 3.45 ± 0.44& | 14.95 ± 2.37& | 61 ± 8.86& |
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (n = 10/group). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, SPSS computer program
*Mean significant difference vs control group (P < 0.05)
#Mean significant difference vs geraniol group (P < 0.05)
&Mean significant difference vs d-galactose group (P < 0.05)
Effect of geraniol treatment on brain redox status parameters, cholinergic functions, and inflammatory markers in all the studied groups
| Parameters/groups | Group I (control group) | (Group II) (geraniol group) | (Group III) ( | (Group IV) ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ach level (U/mg protein) | 6.2 ± 0.61 | 6.04 ± 0.43 | 4.5 ± 0.75*,# | 5.75 ± 0.75& |
| AchE activity (U/mg protein) | 2.9 ± 0.23 | 2.8 ± 0.22 | 4.92 ± 0.46*,# | 3.04 ± 0.42& |
| MDA level (nmol/mg protein) | 1.5 ± 0.28 | 1.44 ± 0.29 | 4.8 ± 0.73*,# | 1.75 ± 0.48& |
| SOD activity (U/mg protein) | 0.88 ± 0.13 | 0.81 ± 0.12 | 0.68 ± 0.12* | 0.86 ± 0.09& |
| GSH level (µmol/mg protein) | 0.2 ± 0.058 | 0.19 ± 0.036 | 0.07 ± 0.028*,# | 0.18 ± 0.055& |
| NF-kβ (ng/mg protein) | 79.7 ± 6.5 | 79.54 ± 6.33 | 173.9 ± 16.5*,# | 115.5 ± 11.25 *,#,& |
| TNF-α (pg/mg protein) | 17.77 ± 2.55 | 15.77 ± 2.56 | 31.55 ± 4.17*,# | 22.4 ± 4.62*,#,& |
| IL-1β (pg/mg protein) | 44.1 ± 5.79 | 41.74 ± 5.55 | 31.55 ± 4.17*,# | 102.15 ± 9.5*,#,& |
| IL-6 (pg/mg protein) | 20.19 ± 2.9 | 19.2 ± 2.98 | 35.4 ± 3.63*,# | 26.46 ± 3.38*,#,& |
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (n = 10/group). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, SPSS computer program
Ach level acetylcholine level, AchE activity acetylcholinesterase enzyme activity, MDA malondialdehyde, GSH reduced glutathione, NF-κβ nuclear factor kappa beta, SOD superoxide dismutase, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL-1β interleukin 1 beta, IL-6 interleukin 6
*Mean significant difference vs control group (P < 0.05)
#Mean significant difference vs geraniol group (P < 0.05)
&Mean significant difference vs d-galactose group (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Effect of geraniol treatment on brain phosphorylated (phospho) mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs, P38MAPK, and JNK) proteins in all the studied groups. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (n = 10/group). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, SPSS computer program. *Mean significant difference vs control group (P < 0.05). #Mean significant difference vs geraniol group (P < 0.05). &Mean significant difference vs d-galactose group (P < 0.05). JNK c-Jun N-terminal kinase.
Effect of geraniol treatment on BDNF and ER stress sensors in all the studied groups
| Parameters/groups | Group I (control group) | (Group II) (geraniol group) | (Group III) ( | (Group IV) ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDNF level (pg/mg protein) | 9.8 ± 1.51 | 9.54 ± 0.97 | 5.61 ± 1.51*,# | 7.8 ± 1.38*,#,& |
| PERK level (pg/mg protein) | 99.08 ± 8.27 | 99.76 ± 10.89 | 274.61 ± 12.01*,# | 170.4 ± 16.22*,#,& |
| IRE1 level (pg/mg protein) | 67.03 ± 8.08 | 66.91 ± 8.24 | 217.44 ± 15.27*,# | 116.89 ± 13.07*,#,& |
| GRP78 level (ng/mg protein) | 3.26 ± 0.81 | 3.28 ± 1.02 | 14.96 ± 1.75*,# | 7.75 ± 1.91*,#,& |
| CHOP level (ng/mg protein) | 1.32 ± 0.22 | 1.34 ± 0.25 | 4.09 ± 0.37*,# | 2.39 ± 0.51*,#,& |
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (n = 10/group). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, SPSS computer program
BDNF brain derived neurotrophic factor, CHOP C/EBP homologous protein, GRP78 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein, PERK protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase, IRE1 inositol requiring enzyme-1
*Mean significant difference vs control group (P < 0.05)
#Mean significant difference vs geraniol group (P < 0.05)
&Mean significant difference vs d-galactose group (P < 0.05)
Fig. 3Effect of geraniol treatment on relative hippocampal GRP78 and CHOP mRNA expression in all the studied groups. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (n = 10/group). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, SPSS computer program. *Mean significant difference vs control group (P < 0.05). #Mean significant difference vs geraniol group (P < 0.05). &Mean significant difference vs d-galactose group (P < 0.05). GRP78 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein, CHOP C/EBP homologous protein
Fig. 4Effect of geraniol treatment on Hippocampal histopathological alternations in all the studied groups; I Control group, II geraniol group, III d-galactose group, IV D-galactose + geraniol group. Po: polymorphic layer; P: pyramidal layer; M: molecular layer; arrows: represent pyramidal cells with rounded nuclei with prominent nucleoli and basophilic cytoplasm in (I, II) but represent pyramidal cells with pyknotic nuclei and vacuolated acidophilic cytoplasm in (III, IV); arrow heads: apical dendrites extending to molecular layer in (I) but they represent pyramidal cells with fragmented nuclei in (III); wavy arrows: scattered neuroglial cells; V: scattered small blood vessels; curved arrows: represent pyramidal cells with ill-defined nuclei in (III); Tailed arrows: represent corkscrew dendrites of some pyramidal cells in the molecular layer in (III) (H&E. X 400, scale bar = 50 μm)
Fig. 5A Effect of geraniol treatment on hippocampal glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunoreactivity (arrows) in all the studied groups; Control and geraniol groups (I & II) exhibit apparent few GFAP-positive reactive cells in CA1 area, d-galactose group (III) shows an apparent increased number of GFAP-positive reactive cells in CA1 area, and d-galactose + geraniol group (IV) shows an apparent decreased number of GFAP-positive reactive cells in CA1 area (GFAP X 400, scale bar = 50 μm). B Effect of geraniol treatment on the mean area percentage of GFAP immunopositivity reaction. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (n = 10/group). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, SPSS computer program. *Mean significant difference vs control group (P < 0.05) #Mean significant difference vs geraniol group (P < 0.05). &Mean significant difference vs d-galactose group (P < 0.05)
Fig. 6A Effect of geraniol treatment on hippocampal caspase-3 immunoreactivity (arrows) in all the studied groups; control and geraniol groups (I & II) exhibit apparent weak caspase positive reaction in the cytoplasm of pyramidal cells of CA1 area, d-galactose group (III) shows apparent strong caspase positive reaction, and d-galactose + geraniol group (IV) shows apparent moderate caspase positive reaction in the cytoplasm of pyramidal cells of CA1 area (Caspase-3 X 400, scale bar = 50 μm). B Effect of geraniol treatment on mean percentage of caspase-3 immunopositive cells in all the studied groups. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (n = 10/group). Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, SPSS computer program. *Mean significant difference vs control group (P < 0.05) Mean significant difference vs geraniol group (P < 0.05). &Mean significant difference vs d-galactose group (P < 0.05)