Literature DB >> 35234489

VPipe: an Automated Bioinformatics Platform for Assembly and Management of Viral Next-Generation Sequencing Data.

Darlene D Wagner1, Rachel L Marine2, Edward Ramos3, Terry Fei Fan Ng2, Christina J Castro4, Margaret Okomo-Adhiambo5, Krysten Harvey4, Gregory Doho3, Reagan Kelly3, Yatish Jain3, Roman L Tatusov1,3, Hideky Silva3, Paul A Rota2, Agha N Khan5, M Steven Oberste2.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful tool for detecting and investigating viral pathogens; however, analysis and management of the enormous amounts of data generated from these technologies remains a challenge. Here, we present VPipe (the Viral NGS Analysis Pipeline and Data Management System), an automated bioinformatics pipeline optimized for whole-genome assembly of viral sequences and identification of diverse species. VPipe automates the data quality control, assembly, and contig identification steps typically performed when analyzing NGS data. Users access the pipeline through a secure web-based portal, which provides an easy-to-use interface with advanced search capabilities for reviewing results. In addition, VPipe provides a centralized system for storing and analyzing NGS data, eliminating common bottlenecks in bioinformatics analyses for public health laboratories with limited on-site computational infrastructure. The performance of VPipe was validated through the analysis of publicly available NGS data sets for viral pathogens, generating high-quality assemblies for 12 data sets. VPipe also generated assemblies with greater contiguity than similar pipelines for 41 human respiratory syncytial virus isolates and 23 SARS-CoV-2 specimens. IMPORTANCE Computational infrastructure and bioinformatics analysis are bottlenecks in the application of NGS to viral pathogens. As of September 2021, VPipe has been used by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and 12 state public health laboratories to characterize >17,500 and 1,500 clinical specimens and isolates, respectively. VPipe automates genome assembly for a wide range of viruses, including high-consequence pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2. Such automated functionality expedites public health responses to viral outbreaks and pathogen surveillance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated bioinformatics pipeline; infectious disease surveillance; next-generation sequencing (NGS); viral molecular detection

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35234489      PMCID: PMC8941893          DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02564-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Spectr        ISSN: 2165-0497


INTRODUCTION

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have become a vital tool for the characterization of microbial pathogens in clinical microbiology and public health laboratories, with numerous applications in infectious disease diagnostics (1), outbreak investigations (2, 3), public health surveillance (4), and discovery of emerging pathogens (5, 6). Compared to standard Sanger sequencing, NGS technologies are cost-effective and enable high-throughput whole-genome sequencing of microbial pathogens from isolates or from clinical specimens containing multiple species (metagenomics) (7–9). However, NGS generates large amounts of sequence data, ranging from 0.03 to 42 gigabases (Gb) per run (10), creating a critical challenge of effectively analyzing, organizing, reporting, and archiving NGS data within a clinically relevant time frame. The CDC supports public health laboratories (PHLs) in their infectious disease surveillance efforts, which include implementing NGS technologies for molecular detection of viral pathogens (11, 12). Many PHLs have fully adopted NGS technologies (2, 13), yet most PHLs face obstacles in analyzing their sequencing data due to the need for computational bioinformatics infrastructure and/or lack of a dedicated bioinformatics workforce to support analysis pipelines (4, 14). Automated analysis pipelines can help address staffing shortages in bioinformatics analyses, providing rapid data processing and reporting turnaround. Many institutions and research projects have established sophisticated pipelines for the analysis of viral NGS data. Some pipelines focus on assembly of data, often from metagenomes or pathogen host samples, such as InteMAP (15), VirAMP (16), Bio-Docklets (17), MetaVir 2 (18), VirusSeeker (19), drVM (20), VirMAP (21), and LAZYPIPE (22). Other tools, such as DNAscan (23), perform single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and indel analysis without genome assembly. However, not all of these tools are consistently maintained, or they may require a bioinformatics skillset beyond the capabilities of small public health laboratories. Other viral NGS analysis tools are focused on virus discovery, including SURPI (24), EDGE (25), VIP (26), and Genome Detective (27). However, these packages offer limited capabilities for data storage and species/strain subtyping. Here, we introduce VPipe, a system that seamlessly combines data management with standardized viral assembly and a graphical user interface (Fig. 1). Following data upload, analysis begins with filtering, trimming, and deduplication of raw fastq reads, followed by de novo assembly and BLAST comparison of contigs against the NCBI GenBank nucleotide database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). In addition, VPipe implements reference recruitment analysis for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), outputting consensus sequences and SNPs for this high-consequence pathogen. VPipe enables free and confidential access to web-based analysis for public health labs. As an additional distinction, VPipe analysis results are permanently available on the VPipe web-based interface, where users can also download filtered reads and assembled contigs.
FIG 1

VPipe standard analysis pipeline: VPipe takes raw FASTQ data generated by Illumina or Ion Torrent sequencing instruments. Raw reads are processed using the Read Quality and Trimming module prior to de novo assembly using SPAdes and detection of viral contigs via BLASTN. Analysis results are available on the VPipe user interface, accessible through the CDC OAMD portal. For SARS-CoV-2 data sets, reference-based assembly is also run in parallel with the de novo Assembly Module.

VPipe standard analysis pipeline: VPipe takes raw FASTQ data generated by Illumina or Ion Torrent sequencing instruments. Raw reads are processed using the Read Quality and Trimming module prior to de novo assembly using SPAdes and detection of viral contigs via BLASTN. Analysis results are available on the VPipe user interface, accessible through the CDC OAMD portal. For SARS-CoV-2 data sets, reference-based assembly is also run in parallel with the de novo Assembly Module.

RESULTS

VPipe validation for clinical specimens.

VPipe was validated through analysis of 12 publicly available NGS data sets for clinical specimens, and its performance compared against four similar pipelines. VPipe de novo assembly contig lengths for nonsegmented viruses were similar to or exceeded those of drVM, EDGE, VirMAP, and Genome Detective. VPipe assembly of the Ebola virus data set (SRR1553609) generated a contig 18,756 bp in length (Table 1), equivalent to 99.9% the length of its closest BLASTN match, KM233083 (which is part of BioProject PRJNA257197 along with the SRA data set). The VPipe contig was slightly longer than Ebola contigs from EDGE (18,600 bp) and VirMAP (18,728 bp). For the bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) 2 data set, sequenced using Ion Torrent PGM, VPipe generated a contig of 8,726 bp (Table 1); this aligns to 71.3% the length of the BVDV 2 strain USMARC-60764 (KT832817). By comparison, the metagenomic compositional tools, VirMAP and drVM, constructed longer contigs, aligning with 95.6% and 99.9% the length of the USMARC-60764 genome. For the picornavirus test data sets, VPipe provided nearly complete genomes and robust typing accuracy. The VPipe-generated contigs for enterovirus D94, enterovirus D70, human parechovirus 3, enterovirus A71, and coxsackievirus B5 covered 70.0 to 99.9% of the closest complete genome BLASTN hit, compared to 30.6 to 100% for Genome Detective and 95.6 to 100% for VirMAP (Table S1 in the supplemental material). VPipe successfully typed the six enteroviruses through PiType (Table 1). The other tools compared do not incorporate a specific typing module for this group of viruses. VirMAP identified coxsackievirus B5 as “human echovirus 6” and Genome Detective identified enteroviruses D94 and D70 simply as “enterovirus_D,” and enterovirus A71 as “enterovirus_A.”
TABLE 1

VPipe compared with previous tools for data sets of predominantly single virus species

SRA data set, accession no.Target virus (length, kb)bAssembly featuresAssembly results by pipeline
VPipedrVM (20)EDGE (25)VirMAP (21)Genome Detective (27)
SRR1553609 Ebola virus (18.8–19.0)Contig count1n/rd117
Max. contig (bp)18,756n/r18,60018,7287,509
SRR1170797 Bovine viral diarrhea virus 2 (12.3–12.5)Contig count121412
Max. contig (bp)8,72612,2241,60211,6998,481
SRR13403396 Enterovirus D94 (7.3–7.4)Contig count1n/r111
Max. contig (bp)7,457n/r6707,5737,320
PiType (Vpipe)EV-D94-Enterovirus_D
SRR13402413 Enterovirus D70 (∼7.4)Contig count1n/r111
Max. contig (bp)7,353n/r7,2487,395e7,390
PiType (Vpipe)EV-D70-Enterovirus_D
SRR10298816 Human parechovirus 3 (7.2–7.3)Contig count1n/r111
Max. contig (bp)7,153n/r3327,2527,157
PiType (Vpipe)PEV-A3--
SRR10298815 Enterovirus A71 (7.4–7.5)Contig count4n/r12312
Max. contig (bp)6,952n/r8327,4234,919
PiType (Vpipe)EV-A71-Enterovirus_A
SRR10298813 Human parechovirus 3 (7.2–7.3)Contig count5n/r617
Max. contig (bp)6,273n/r4047,2692,220
PiType (Vpipe)PeV-A3--
SRR10298814 Coxsackievirus B5 (7.3–7.4)Contig count2n/r311
Max. contig5,137n/r4,2947,3617,165
PiType (Vpipe)CV-B5-Human echovirus 6
DRR049387 Human rotavirus A (longest segment ∼3.3)Contig countc111371111
Max. contig (bp)3,4623,3753,3383,3493,299
ERR690519 Influenza A virus (longest segment ∼2.3)Contig countc88889
Max. contig (bp)2,3402,3402,3702,2972,285
SRR1106548 HIV-1 (∼9.7)Contig count812584
Max. contig (bp)4,9562,8195,1955,1634,319
Microviridae (2.7–37.0)Contig count1Not detectedNot detected1Not detected
Max. contig (bp)5,2115,129
GB virus C (9.3–9.4)Contig count84Not detected5382
Max. contig (bp)1,6121,6392,0049,102
SRR1106123 Hepatitis C virus (9.6–9.8)Contig count215211
Max. contig (bp)5,1252,2277,8509,3169,418
GB virus C (9.3–9.4)Contig count21591012
Max. contig (bp)9,0138255,7119,2769,295

Strain-typing by PiType shown for VPipe in rows 3 through 8. Comparable presumptive annotation in VirMAP and Genome Detective (rows 3 through 8) shown as ‘-’ unless otherwise indicated.

Approximate length of complete viral genomes (kb), or the longest segment for segmented genomes.

Matches and trimming information are shown in Tables S1–, S3.

n/r, no results; only previously published results used for comparison.

Trimmed 137 bp.

VPipe compared with previous tools for data sets of predominantly single virus species Strain-typing by PiType shown for VPipe in rows 3 through 8. Comparable presumptive annotation in VirMAP and Genome Detective (rows 3 through 8) shown as ‘-’ unless otherwise indicated. Approximate length of complete viral genomes (kb), or the longest segment for segmented genomes. Matches and trimming information are shown in Tables S1–, S3. n/r, no results; only previously published results used for comparison. Trimmed 137 bp. For a clinical data set of 41 human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) specimens, VPipe generated assemblies of equivalent contig lengths to the manually curated genomes of the original study (28). The distribution of contig lengths generated by VPipe and in the original study was statistically equivalent (pairwise Wilcoxon, P = 0.50), with average maximum contig lengths of 12,575 bp and 13,039 bp, respectively (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the average maximum contig length for EDGE with host read removal was only 2,109 bp (Fig. 2A) (P = 4.55 × 10−13). When EDGE was run on reads preprocessed through VPipe, the average maximum contig length increased to 10,151 bp (Fig. 2A) but was still significantly shorter than VPipe contigs (P = 0.0015). With an average maximum contig length of 10,883 bp, Genome Detective also yielded shorter contigs than VPipe (P = 0.00024).
FIG 2

Distribution of longest assembled contigs for HRSV and SARS-CoV-2 clinical data sets. (A) Bar plots indicating the average longest contigs assembled for 41 human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) samples. From left to right, bars represent average maximum contig lengths (bp) from Agoti et al. (2015), representing manually curated assemblies (28): EDGE with host sequence removal, EDGE with reads preprocessed through VPipe, Genome Detective, and VPipe. (B) Bar plots indicating the average longest contigs assembled for 23 SARS-CoV-2 specimens using EDGE with host sequence removal, EDGE with reads preprocessed through VPipe, Genome Detective, and VPipe. Whiskers represent standard error of the mean. Bar plots with the same letter are statistically equivalent (pairwise Wilcoxon’s test).

Distribution of longest assembled contigs for HRSV and SARS-CoV-2 clinical data sets. (A) Bar plots indicating the average longest contigs assembled for 41 human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) samples. From left to right, bars represent average maximum contig lengths (bp) from Agoti et al. (2015), representing manually curated assemblies (28): EDGE with host sequence removal, EDGE with reads preprocessed through VPipe, Genome Detective, and VPipe. (B) Bar plots indicating the average longest contigs assembled for 23 SARS-CoV-2 specimens using EDGE with host sequence removal, EDGE with reads preprocessed through VPipe, Genome Detective, and VPipe. Whiskers represent standard error of the mean. Bar plots with the same letter are statistically equivalent (pairwise Wilcoxon’s test). De novo assembly results for segmented viruses were also similar across compared pipelines. For rotavirus A, VPipe, VirMAP, and Genome Detective identified and assembled all 11 genome segments as a single contig (Table 1, Tables S2–S4). Segments assembled through VPipe, VirMAP, and Genome Detective shared an average nucleotide identity of 99.2 to 99.3% with assemblies generated by the researchers who sequenced the corresponding original data set (29, 30) (Tables S2–S4). For influenza virus, each of the compared tools except Genome Detective identified all eight genome segments as a single contig each (Table 1, Tables S5 and S6). Segments assembled by VPipe averaged 1,693 bp in length and shared an average 99.7% identity with their top BLASTN matches, which averaged 1,703 bp in length (Table S5). VPipe produced assemblies for specimens containing multiple virus species with comparable accuracy to drVM, EDGE, VirMAP, and Genome Detective. For the HIV-1 data set, VPipe produced eight HIV-1 contigs, with a maximum contig length only slightly shorter than the longest contigs assembled using EDGE and VirMAP (by 239 and 207 bp, respectively, Table 1). Also, in the HIV-1 data set, VPipe assembled a set of 84 contigs sharing 86 to 94% BLASTN identity with GB virus C virus isolate R10291 (U45966). In contrast, Genome Detective assembled a 9,102-bp GB virus C contig which aligned to 97.1% of the length of U45966. VPipe and VirMAP assembled and identified a single contig which shared 69% identity (over ∼40% of its length) with Microviridae isolate ctjj553 (MH617085) (Table S1); Genome Detective and EDGE did not report Microviridae-related sequences (Table 1). For the hepatitis C data set, the largest VPipe contig aligned to 54% of the genome length of hepatitis C, isolate HCV-1b/US/BID-V126/1991 (EU234061), whereas for the VirMAP and Genome Detective pipelines, maximum contigs aligned to 99.0% and 100.0% of EU234061, respectively (Table S1). VPipe, VirMAP and Genome Detective also assembled a nearly complete genome of GB virus C, which was also present in the specimen (Table 1, Table S1).

VPipe validation for SARS-CoV-2.

VPipe produced both de novo and reference-based assemblies of SARS-CoV-2 with quality comparable to that of the leading pipelines. For de novo assembly of 23 SARS-CoV-2 specimens, VPipe produced significantly longer contigs than EDGE with host removal and Genome Detective (pairwise Wilcoxon’s, P = 0.00603 and P = 0.00282, respectively; Fig. 2B), whereas there was no significant difference in the contig length distribution between VPipe and EDGE with VPipe preprocessing (P = 0.862). For the reference-based assembly of SARS-CoV-2, VPipe generated 22 consensus genomes that were 29,903 bp in length (matching the length of the reference, MN908947, Table S7) plus one consensus which was 29,904 bp in length due to an extra masked base (which was manually removed). The majority of SNPs were found to be concordant between the original consensus available in GenBank and the consensus generated with VPipe and Genome Detective. For 22 of 23 sequences, the number of SNPs detected in VPipe consensus (with 25× minimum read cutoff filter) and Genome Detective consensus sequences differed from the original consensus by no more than 3 SNPs (Table S8). Discordant SNPs typically occurred within 100 bp of the 5′ or 3′ end of the SARS-CoV-2 genomes (not likely changing protein function) and reflected SNPs with low read coverage. In VPipe consensus with the 25× filter, 98.5% of SNPs were concordant with Genome Detective.

DISCUSSION

The VPipe de novo assembly analysis pipeline comprises three stages: Read Quality and Trimming, de novo Assembly, and Virus Detection (Fig. 1). EDGE and Genome Detective similarly implement three stages and were employed in comparative analyses with VPipe across all data sets in the current study. Whereas VPipe uses Cutadapt (31) and a custom Python script (dedup.py [32]) to perform trimming and de-duplication/masking, EDGE and Genome Detective use FaQCs (33) and Trimmomatic (34), respectively. As an optional host-read removal step, EDGE implements BWA (25) while host removal (non-optional in VPipe) is implemented by Bowtie2 (35). VPipe, Genome Detective, and EDGE (depending on user settings) all employ SPAdes, which previous studies have shown to produce the most consistent assemblies for viral data (36, 37). Use of SPAdes likely led to similar performance for 9 of the 12 specimens shown in Table 1. In some instances, VPipe produced less fragmented assemblies. This may be due to the Read Quality and Trimming module employed by VPipe, since using Vpipe-preprocessed reads as the input for EDGE led to longer assembled contigs for HRSV genomes (Fig. 2A). Only VirMAP consistently outperformed VPipe, likely due to the implementation of reference-based assembly in the default VirMAP pipeline. The VPipe reference recruitment module compared favorably to current reference-based pipelines for SARS-CoV-2 and identified comparable SNPs to Genome Detective. SNPs which were not concordant corresponded to regions with lower read coverage, where differences in quality, read trimming, and coverage cutoffs between pipelines likely led to slight differences between consensus genome results. The 25× coverage cutoff for VPipe reference recruitment is intermediate between less stringent 10× (38) and more stringent 75× (39) cutoffs employed in other SARS-CoV-2 analysis pipelines. Since accurate identification of SNPs is important for classifying SARS-CoV-2 variants and accurate phylogenies (38–40), the >98% SNP concordance between VPipe (25× filter consensus) and Genome Detective supports the results generated by the VPipe reference recruitment module. VPipe enables users to perform quality control, de novo assembly, virus discovery, strain typing for picornaviruses, and reference-recruitment analysis (for SARS-CoV-2 data). VPipe utilizes open-source software which performs consistently well for viral data as shown through internal testing and previous studies (25, 37, 41, 42). The system allows standardized, whole-genome assemblies, making it easier to reproduce and publish NGS results (Fig. 1). VPipe simplifies bioinformatics analyses by providing a user-friendly, web-based system that can be operated by users ranging from experienced bioinformaticians to laboratorians with little or no scientific computing experience. To date, VPipe has been utilized for NGS analysis in 20 studies published from 2016 to 2020 to identify 16 different species of viral pathogens in multiple specimen types (Table S9). VPipe can also reconstruct viral genomes from specimens containing multiple viruses, as demonstrated by the detection of additional viruses in the HIV-1 and hepatitis C data sets (Table 1). To facilitate NGS data analysis and archiving, VPipe possesses a set of data management and query functions not commonly found in other freely available NGS pipelines. For example, the advanced sorting and filtering options in VPipe make it easy to identify contigs of interest from multiple samples within an analysis run (Fig. S1). Finally, VPipe provides a permanent display of analysis results, including visualizations. Future development of VPipe will involve the expansion and addition of modules in VPipe to address ever-changing public health needs. This includes implementation of the reference recruitment module for other high-consequence viral pathogens, integrating additional typing tools, and developing a module to analyze Oxford Nanopore sequence data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pipeline structure and organization.

(i) Bioinformatics pipeline. The VPipe standard analysis pipeline (Fig. 1) processes raw FASTQ data generated on Illumina (Illumina, San Diego, CA), and Ion Torrent platforms by user request (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The raw FASTQ sequencing reads (paired-end reads) are first filtered to remove human sequences using the Bowtie2 aligner (version 2.3.5.1) (35), based on recruitment to the hg19 reference genome (43). Sequence reads are then trimmed to remove primers and adapters using Cutadapt (version 2.3) (31), which also filters out any reads shorter than 50 bp or with a Phred quality score of less than 20. To prevent biased coverage of genomic regions, duplicate reads are removed with the Python program dedup.py (32). The resultant FASTQ reads are assembled de novo using SPAdes (version 3.15.0) (44) with the kmer parameter “-k 21,33,55,77,99,121” for data sets with read lengths of >130 bp; otherwise, “-k 21,33,55,77,99.” Assembled contigs are compared against the NCBI nonredundant database by BLASTN (version 2.9.0) (45). Nucleotide alignment scores are used to categorize contigs according to their similarity to viral pathogens. For selected viral groups, filtered FASTQ reads are processed through a reference recruitment assembly module in addition to de novo assembly. At present, only SARS-CoV-2 data are processed through the reference recruitment module, where a guided assembly is conducted using the SARS-CoV-2 reference strain Wuhan-Hu-1 (MN908947). A hard trim of 30 nucleotides is applied on each end of sequencing reads using Cutadapt (version 2.3) to remove sequence over potential primer binding regions (since many labs are employing amplicon-based strategies for targeted SARS-CoV-2 sequencing). Trimmed reads are then aligned using Bowtie2 aligner (version 2.1.0). Samtools (version 1.10) is then used to generate sorted .bam files, which are then used to generate bedGraph files. Freebayes (version 1.0.2) is then used to generate .vcf files, and BEDTools (version 2.27.1) is used to assemble a consensus fasta sequence file for the SARS-CoV-2 specimens. Reference and new consensus sequences are aligned using kalign (version 1.04). (ii) Pipeline architecture. Data flow in VPipe is coordinated by four major components which control access, data analysis, storage, and visualization, respectively (Fig. S2). The Data Transfer tool, a supporting application from CDC OAMD, enables batch uploads from multiple directories corresponding to different NGS runs to be processed through VPipe. The Data Processing Layer monitors sequencing data upload to the Data Transfer tool (accessible to external users with a VPipe account) and initializes automation of the “Bioinformatics Analysis Pipeline.” The VPipe Software Modules (Fig. 1) which encompass the Data Processing and Database layers (Fig. S2), are hidden from the user and run automatically without user interaction. The VPipe Database layer utilizes MongoDB, which provides a centralized database for NGS analysis results. The Data Visualization component utilizes the MERN architecture (MongoDB, ExpressJS, ReactJS, NodeJS) to modulate the flow of information from the database to a webpage to display the final results. (iii) VPipe interface. Analysis results are viewed on the VPipe web interface, accessible through the CDC Secure Access Management System (SAMS) (https://sams.cdc.gov) and OAMD portal. The 20 most recently analyzed runs are listed on the Run page (i.e., landing page); older runs can be accessed using the “Search by Run ID” feature at the top of the page (Fig. S3A). Selecting a run and clicking the “View Samples” button (Fig. S3B) opens the “Samples” page (Fig. S3C), providing basic information on the specimens analyzed and the top virus detected (i.e., BLASTN hit for the longest contig with a viral match). FastQC results for each specimen are also accessible from this page by clicking “Expand” at the bottom of each sample tile (Fig. S3C). Users select the tiles for specimens to view, and then select “View Contigs.” This opens the “Contigs” results page, displaying the BLASTN results for assembled contigs and allowing selection of contigs for download (Fig. S1). Contig results can be sorted based on contig length, sample ID (when reviewing results for multiple specimens), minimum percent identity, species, and genus, and can be filtered based on the taxonomy and percent identity of the BLASTN results. By default, a classification filter for “viruses” is applied, but this filter can be removed to view contigs with non-viral BLASTN matches. A blue “Type” button is activated for contigs with a BLASTN hit to picornaviruses. This pushes the contig to PiType, a web-based typing tool for picornaviruses (https://pitype.cdc.gov/). For SARS-CoV-2 data, on the Samples page for a given run, users can choose to view either de novo assembly results or reference-based recruitment results. The reference-based recruitment output displays an alignment of the consensus sequences and reference genome, and a table summarizing SNPs and their quality, computed internally by FreeBayes. The output also includes a section for downloading the filtered reads, consensus sequences, alignments, and variant/SNP calls.

VPipe benchmarking.

(i) Validation of the VPipe was validated through analysis of publicly available NGS data sets for clinical specimens. The performance of the pipeline was benchmarked against similar tools, including drVM (20), EDGE (25), VirMAP (21), and Genome Detective (27). For comparative analysis using EDGE, both raw reads and VPipe-preprocessed reads were analyzed with human/host read removal and SPAdes assembly. Raw reads were run through VirMAP and Genome Detective using the default settings. Assembly results for drVM were taken from published comparisons (20). Contigs constructed in VPipe, VirMAP, and EDGE which exceeded the target virus genome or segment size were trimmed in Geneious 11.1.5 (https://www.geneious.com/). For rotavirus (DRR049387), up to 167 bp, 667 bp, and 17 bp was trimmed from ends of contigs constructed using VPipe, VirMAP, and Genome Detective, respectively (Tables S2–S4). For influenza virus (ERR690519), VPipe contigs and VirMAP contigs both required up to 20-bp trimming from ends (Tables S5 and S6); Genome Detective contigs required no trimming. For enterovirus D70, the VirMAP contig required 137 bp to be trimmed from the 5′ end (Table 1). For nonsegmented viruses, genome coverage of contigs was estimated by comparing them against selected complete GenBank genomes through NCBI BLASTN (46) (Table S1). For SARS-CoV-2 analysis in VPipe, 23 de novo assemblies were manually corrected in Geneious 11.1.5, due to either misassembled regions or mismatching regions relative to the Wuhan reference (MN908947.3), and had an average of 281 bp trimmed (Table S7). These specimens are the same data set used for validation of the reference recruitment module (see Methods). For the human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) and SARS-CoV-2 data sets, maximum contig lengths were compared across VPipe, EDGE, and Genome Detective using R (version 3.6.1). Run times in VPipe for the SRA samples analyzed ranged from 23.2 min to 41.6 h (median = 59.5 min), depending upon the size and complexity of the data set. (ii) Validation of the reference recruitment module. Twenty SARS-CoV-2 specimens and three control isolates were previously sequenced at the CDC in January 2021 and the consensus genomes submitted to NCBI (MZ348310, MZ348328-MZ348329, MZ391030-MZ391046). Briefly, SARS-CoV-2 amplicons were generated using a multiplex PCR (4-pool procedure was derived from the 6-pool procedure as previously described [47]), followed by Illumina DNA Prep and sequencing on a MiSeq 300 cycle v2 run (2 × 150 bp). The original consensus genomes uploaded to NCBI were generated using a pipeline at the CDC, employing IRMA with settings customized for SARS-CoV-2 (48). Consensus sequences from NCBI GenBank were aligned with VPipe (unmasked consensus and consensus masked at positions with coverage of <25×) and Genome Detective consensus using MAFFT in Geneious 11.1.5 to detect and compare SNPs. (iii) VPipe availability. VPipe is hosted on the CDC's Office of Advanced Molecular Detection (OAMD) Scientific Computing and Bioinformatics Support and high-performance cluster. The application is available to CDC partner public health laboratories, and access can be requested by emailing vpipe@cdc.gov.
  46 in total

Review 1.  Integrating Advanced Molecular Technologies into Public Health.

Authors:  Marta Gwinn; Duncan R MacCannell; Rima F Khabbaz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Assuring the Quality of Next-Generation Sequencing in Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratories.

Authors:  Amy S Gargis; Lisa Kalman; Ira M Lubin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The real cost of sequencing: higher than you think!

Authors:  Andrea Sboner; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Dov Greenbaum; Raymond K Auerbach; Mark B Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Whole genomic analysis of human G1P[8] rotavirus strains from different age groups in China.

Authors:  Tsuzumi Shintani; Souvik Ghosh; Yuan-Hong Wang; Xuan Zhou; Dun-Jin Zhou; Nobumichi Kobayashi
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Maximal viral information recovery from sequence data using VirMAP.

Authors:  Nadim J Ajami; Matthew C Wong; Matthew C Ross; Richard E Lloyd; Joseph F Petrosino
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Genomic epidemiology of superspreading events in Austria reveals mutational dynamics and transmission properties of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Alexandra Popa; Jakob-Wendelin Genger; Michael D Nicholson; Thomas Penz; Daniela Schmid; Stephan W Aberle; Benedikt Agerer; Alexander Lercher; Lukas Endler; Henrique Colaço; Mark Smyth; Michael Schuster; Miguel L Grau; Francisco Martínez-Jiménez; Oriol Pich; Wegene Borena; Erich Pawelka; Zsofia Keszei; Martin Senekowitsch; Jan Laine; Judith H Aberle; Monika Redlberger-Fritz; Mario Karolyi; Alexander Zoufaly; Sabine Maritschnik; Martin Borkovec; Peter Hufnagl; Manfred Nairz; Günter Weiss; Michael T Wolfinger; Dorothee von Laer; Giulio Superti-Furga; Nuria Lopez-Bigas; Elisabeth Puchhammer-Stöckl; Franz Allerberger; Franziska Michor; Christoph Bock; Andreas Bergthaler
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  COVseq is a cost-effective workflow for mass-scale SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance.

Authors:  Michele Simonetti; Ning Zhang; Luuk Harbers; Maria Grazia Milia; Silvia Brossa; Thi Thu Huong Nguyen; Francesco Cerutti; Enrico Berrino; Anna Sapino; Magda Bienko; Antonino Sottile; Valeria Ghisetti; Nicola Crosetto
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.

Authors:  Rodrigo García-López; Jorge Francisco Vázquez-Castellanos; Andrés Moya
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-17

9.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Bioinformatic data processing pipelines in support of next-generation sequencing-based HIV drug resistance testing: the Winnipeg Consensus.

Authors:  Hezhao Ji; Eric Enns; Chanson J Brumme; Neil Parkin; Mark Howison; Emma R Lee; Rupert Capina; Eric Marinier; Santiago Avila-Rios; Paul Sandstrom; Gary Van Domselaar; Richard Harrigan; Roger Paredes; Rami Kantor; Marc Noguera-Julian
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.396

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of EPISEQ SARS-CoV-2 and a Fully Integrated Application to Identify SARS-CoV-2 Variants from Several Next-Generation Sequencing Approaches.

Authors:  Nathalie Mugnier; Aurélien Griffon; Bruno Simon; Maxence Rambaud; Hadrien Regue; Antonin Bal; Gregory Destras; Maud Tournoud; Magali Jaillard; Abel Betraoui; Emmanuelle Santiago; Valérie Cheynet; Alexandre Vignola; Véronique Ligeon; Laurence Josset; Karen Brengel-Pesce
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.818

2.  Genome Sequences of 16 Enterovirus Isolates from Environmental Sewage in Guatemala, 2019 to 2021.

Authors:  Chelsea Harrington; Leanna Sayyad; Christina Castro; Jamaica Hill; Stacey Jeffries-Miles; Hanen Belgasmi; Gloria Rey-Benito; María Linda Mendoza Prillwitz; Leticia Castillo Signor; Nancy Gerloff
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2022-08-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.