Mustafa Neşet Çınar1, Aleandro Antidormi2, Viet-Hung Nguyen3, Alessandro Kovtun4, Samuel Lara-Avila5, Andrea Liscio6, Jean-Christophe Charlier3, Stephan Roche2,7, Hâldun Sevinçli1. 1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, 35430 Urla, Izmir, Turkey. 2. Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, CSIC and The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. 4. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Sintesi Organica e la Fotoreattivitá, (CNR-ISOF), via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy. 5. Department of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 9, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden. 6. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Microelettronica e Microsistemi, Roma Unit (CNR-IMM), via del fosso del cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy. 7. ICREA-Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, 08010 Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
In the context of graphene-based composite applications, a complete understanding of charge conduction in multilayer reduced graphene oxides (rGO) is highly desirable. However, these rGO compounds are characterized by multiple and different sources of disorder depending on the chemical method used for their synthesis. Most importantly, the precise role of interlayer interaction in promoting or jeopardizing electronic flow remains unclear. Here, thanks to the development of a multiscale computational approach combining first-principles calculations with large-scale transport simulations, the transport scaling laws in multilayer rGO are unraveled, explaining why diffusion worsens with increasing film thickness. In contrast, contacted films are found to exhibit an opposite trend when the mean free path becomes shorter than the channel length, since conduction becomes predominantly driven by interlayer hopping. These predictions are favorably compared with experimental data and open a road toward the optimization of graphene-based composites with improved electrical conduction.
In the context of graphene-based composite applications, a complete understanding of charge conduction in multilayer reduced graphene oxides (rGO) is highly desirable. However, these rGO compounds are characterized by multiple and different sources of disorder depending on the chemical method used for their synthesis. Most importantly, the precise role of interlayer interaction in promoting or jeopardizing electronic flow remains unclear. Here, thanks to the development of a multiscale computational approach combining first-principles calculations with large-scale transport simulations, the transport scaling laws in multilayer rGO are unraveled, explaining why diffusion worsens with increasing film thickness. In contrast, contacted films are found to exhibit an opposite trend when the mean free path becomes shorter than the channel length, since conduction becomes predominantly driven by interlayer hopping. These predictions are favorably compared with experimental data and open a road toward the optimization of graphene-based composites with improved electrical conduction.
Entities:
Keywords:
charge transport; disordered van der Waals thin films; interlayer transport; multilayer transport scaling law; quantum transport; reduced graphene oxides
Understanding
charge transport
in multilayered van der Waals materials has become an attractive and
challenging problem, in the perspective of both fundamental and applied
research on graphene-based composites.[1,2,35] Indeed, graphene-related materials (including chemically
disordered graphene like rGO) have shown remarkable capability to
improve charge and thermal conductivities of many insulating flexible
materials such as organic polymers, suggesting them as the privileged
filler material to reinforce, diversify, and improve the properties
and performances of traditional materials used in wearables, flexible
electronics, conducting textiles, and thermoplastics. However, accurate
understanding of the microscopic mechanisms leading to transport in
these complex systems is still a matter of debate. Indeed, recent
experimental studies[3−5] suggested the key role played by various types of
defects, as well as interlayer interaction in the transport mechanisms
taking place inside the graphene-based composites.More specifically,
transport characteristics in multilayered rGO[5] were observed to change from a conventional Efros-Shkloskii
variable range hopping (ES-VRH)[36,37] to a temperature-dependent
power-law regime, with increasing number of stacked layers. Such findings
do not apparently depend on any length scale of the system, since
they are observed in both micrometric networks of few nanosheets partially
overlapping, as well as in centimeter-scale thin films built from
billions of rGO nanosheets randomly stacked. Besides, the resulting
localization length is also found to increase (by 3 orders of magnitude)
with both the aromatic content and the thickness of the thin films
as well, while being roughly independent of the lateral size nanosheet.
Accordingly, the main contribution to transport properties in multilayered
rGO with random stacking likely stems from a bulk contribution, with
marginal nanosheet edge effects.[5]Here, we investigate charge transport in rGO thin films using state-of-the-art
modeling techniques and compared the results with experimental measurements.
The multilayered rGO models are constructed using a rectangular ribbon-like
geometry with a width of 20 nm and periodic boundary conditions in
the transverse direction. Disorder is introduced by incorporating
random distributions of chemical defects (Figure a) such as divacancies (0.29%), Stone–Wales
defects (0.01%), and epoxides (4.7%). Such chemical nature and densities
of defects have been extracted from atomistic samples of rGO obtained
by classical molecular simulations of the thermal reduction process
of graphene oxide (GO) sheets.[6] More specifically,
to produce the models, we employ the thermal annealing protocol described
in ref (6), since it
reproduces the main structural features observed in measured rGO samples.
In these MD simulations, large-scale GO samples with an initial equivalent
concentration of epoxide and hydroxyl groups, amounting to a O/C ratio
of 35%, were annealed at 900 °C. At the end of the annealing
process, the final concentration of oxygen atoms was found to be approximately
5%, in excellent agreement with the experimental results reported
in ref (5).
Figure 1
Reduced graphene
oxide hosts different types of defects that are
randomly distributed (a), where carbon atoms are colored with gray,
and oxygen with red. Pentagon, heptagon, and octagons are indicated
with red, blue, and green shades. Charge transport calculations in
typical multilayered rGO models are investigated in rGO using (b)
the Kubo formalism to estimate the bulk electronic conductivity and
(c) the Landauer-Büttiker approach in a conventional device
geometry. (d) Atomic structures of various incorporated defect types
(pristine divacancy (585), reconstructed divacancy (555–777),
Stone–Wales (55–77), and epoxy defects) and their corresponding
tight-binding models (e) extracted from ab initio band-structure calculations.
Reduced graphene
oxide hosts different types of defects that are
randomly distributed (a), where carbon atoms are colored with gray,
and oxygen with red. Pentagon, heptagon, and octagons are indicated
with red, blue, and green shades. Charge transport calculations in
typical multilayered rGO models are investigated in rGO using (b)
the Kubo formalism to estimate the bulk electronic conductivity and
(c) the Landauer-Büttiker approach in a conventional device
geometry. (d) Atomic structures of various incorporated defect types
(pristine divacancy (585), reconstructed divacancy (555–777),
Stone–Wales (55–77), and epoxy defects) and their corresponding
tight-binding models (e) extracted from ab initio band-structure calculations.These chemical defects are known to induce lattice distortion and
charge redistribution locally around their spatial location.[7−12] Since these detrimental effects are local, rGO models with defect
concentrations similar to those investigated in this study can be
modeled using a conventional tight-binding (TB) Hamiltonian (as for
graphene) but with specific adjustments made locally around the defect
position. Within such a framework, the Hamiltonian of the rGO system
presents a simple form allowing one to further perform large-scale
transport calculations in realistic samples containing more than 106 atoms and with varying defect concentrations. The parametrized p TB Hamiltonian readswhere in-plane couplings are limited to nearest-neighboring
interactions. In contrast with other models in the literature (see
refs (13, 14)), the effects of chemical defects are described by
properly adjusting the TB parameters to recover ab initio results. The optimization of these TB parameters for each specific
single defect are obtained by fitting first-principles electronic
band structures of the graphene supercell containing a single defect
(see Supporting Information).Importantly,
the change in C–C bond length due to the lattice
distortion around the defects is accounted for by computing the hopping
energies as a function of C–C bond length (r) and defining γ = γ0 exp[−β(r/r0 – 1)] with nearest-neighbor hopping energy γ0 = −2.6 eV, nearest-neighbor distance r0 = 1.42 Å, and the decay parameter β = 3.37.[15] The local doping due to the localized states
induced by defects and impurities is also included by modulating onsite
energies as a distance-decay function centered at the defect positions.
Since the atomic positions are altered around defects, the parametrization
for interlayer coupling also requires one to account for changes in
interatomic distances compared to Bernal graphite (AB-stacking). Consequently,
to determine TB couplings in the presence of varying bond lengths
around structural defects, an exponential decay-based model formula
is used following γ(r) = γ1 exp(β(1 – r/z)) with interlayer coupling energy γ1 = 0.36 eV, the corresponding decay parameter β = 24.99, and interlayer distance z = 3.34 Å.[16,17] Further details and
comparison against density functional theory and other methods are
given in the Supporting Information. The
different types of considered defects used in the model are illustrated
in Figure d. The electronic
bands obtained from TB parametrization are in excellent agreement
with first-principles density functional theory results (Figure e). Dependence of
electronic structure and transport properties of twisted graphene
layers has been studied intensely during the last years, and it was
shown that even small twist angles give rise to substantial changes.[18−20,33] A similar effect is not expected
in randomly stacked rGO, because defects are strong scattering centers
compared to the weak interlayer coupling. Hence, scattering from impurities
is the dominant mechanism for the randomization of carriers’
momenta causing more than 100 scatterings within the interlayer diffusion
length. Indeed, conductivity was shown to be practically independent
of the twist angle in twisted bilayer graphene in the presence of
lower concentrations of random defects.[21]Kubo-Greenwood (KG) and Landauer-Büttiker (LB) transport
formalisms are used to study the electronic conductivity and conductance
in multilayered rGO models and for varying transport geometries (see Figure b,c, respectively).
The LB method[22−24] allows one to include the charge injection from contact
electrodes (Figure c), whereas the KG method gives access to bulk properties[25] (Figure b). These two techniques enable contrasting bulk properties
with “device” related transport (see Supporting Information for details). Note that neither electron–phonon
coupling nor many-body effects are included in the present study.Figure a presents
the energy-dependent conductance for the mono-, bi-, and trilayer
rGO for identical defect concentration, calculated within the LB approach.
When layers are free from defects (pristine graphene), adding new
layers will act as a supplemental scattering source, hence reducing
the total conductance (see Figure a-inset). Indeed, in defect-free monolayer graphene,
transport is ballistic and a maximum V-shaped conductance curve is
obtained. When more clean layers are stacked on top of this graphene
layer, new scattering channels are opened and an interface resistance
is formed. Consequently, the conductance of bi- and trilayers (multilayered
stack) is reduced below the single layer of pristine monolayer graphene.
Actually, such conductance decay is not specific to disorder-free
systems but is also observed in low-defect concentrations as well
(see Figure S6). Importantly, this reduction
of the electronic transmission is found when the electrodes are attached
to the bottom layer, and it decreases in a non-monotonic way with
the number of added layers. This behavior can be understood as driven
by complicated interference processes taking place across the layers
and throughout the central region.
Figure 2
(a) Electronic conductance of mono/bi/trilayer
rGO devices (blue,
red, green curves, respectively) as a function of energy. The conductance
is found to increase with the number of rGO layers, in contrast with
stack of pristine graphene (inset). (b) Electronic conductance of
mono- and trilayered rGO systems for E = 6.7 meV
(lower region) and E = −73.8 meV (upper region)
estimated by LB (markers) and eq (solid lines). Mean free paths used in eq are determined by using KG method. Diffusive
versus localized regimes in multilayered rGO devices are distinguished
by referring to the β-function (c). Transport regimes in pristine
and defective stacks are illustrated in (d,e).(f) Local density of
states (LDOS) around the Fermi level in multilayer rGO is shown for
a relatively smaller sample. LDOS for individual layers and the multilayer
are shown in the below panels. Red, green, and blue correspond to
individual layers from bottom to top.
(a) Electronic conductance of mono/bi/trilayer
rGO devices (blue,
red, green curves, respectively) as a function of energy. The conductance
is found to increase with the number of rGO layers, in contrast with
stack of pristine graphene (inset). (b) Electronic conductance of
mono- and trilayered rGO systems for E = 6.7 meV
(lower region) and E = −73.8 meV (upper region)
estimated by LB (markers) and eq (solid lines). Mean free paths used in eq are determined by using KG method. Diffusive
versus localized regimes in multilayered rGO devices are distinguished
by referring to the β-function (c). Transport regimes in pristine
and defective stacks are illustrated in (d,e).(f) Local density of
states (LDOS) around the Fermi level in multilayer rGO is shown for
a relatively smaller sample. LDOS for individual layers and the multilayer
are shown in the below panels. Red, green, and blue correspond to
individual layers from bottom to top.In sharp contrast, in strongly disordered rGO systems, the electronic
behavior is opposite, in the sense that the higher the number of added
layers on the stack, the larger the conductance (Figure a, main frame). This counterintuitive
result suggests that the interlayer hopping is opening more conductive
channels once the localization length of the bottom layer is short
enough due to strong in-plane disorder. The two opposite roles played
by interlayer coupling in defect-free and defective multilayers are
pictured in Figure d,e.To better understand the electronic transport mechanisms
in mono-
and multilayered rGO systems, we perform a scaling study of the conductance
to better differentiate between diffusive and localized regimes. Figure b shows results for
the mono- to multilayered rGO systems presenting the same defect density.
Clear evidence for different scaling behaviors is observed (note that
conductance values from LB simulations are marked with circles (monolayer)
and crosses (trilayer)). In the diffusion regime, the conductance
dependence with the length is theoretically expected to scale as a
function of the mean-free-path () and the defect-free conductance
(GGraphene) of the system (at a given
energy)
followingwhere L is device length.[23]For
short enough channel length, the computed conductance scaling
is indeed well described by the diffusive formula
(eq ), allowing the extraction of from simulations. For the chosen
disorder
features, in the
range of 1–2 nm is obtained
(Figure b, inset),
regardless of the chosen transport formalism. As the number of layers
is increased, decreases
slightly (Figure S5). We note that we report
here the scaling behavior
of G values for two selected energies (6.7 meV and
−73.8 meV), but the trends are similar at all energies around
the charge neutrality point (CNP).We further observe that for
channel length L >
10 nm, the conductance values for the monolayer are below the diffusion
curve (which are plotted by solid lines). This pinpoints the onset
of localization effects. However, for the trilayer case, a puzzling
sudden change of the conductance behavior is seen for a channel length
of 10 nm. To further substantiate this striking difference of the
conductance scaling between monolayer and multilayered stack, we investigate
the localization regime and capture quantitative information about
the localization lengths. LB simulations are performed on rGO systems
with long channel lengths and using the scaling function defined as
β = ∂ ln G/∂ ln L.[28] Substituting the corresponding expressions
for diffusion and localization, β can be written as in the
diffusive regime, whereas in the
localization regime with being the localization length.
Both scaling
functions (βdif and βloc) are presented
in Figure c versus
the device length. The solid curves represent predictions of the aforementioned
analytical formulas, whereas the markers are directly obtained from
the simulation (for an energy of 6 meV) without referring to or , since the scaling functions can
be expressed
as βdif = G/GGraphene – 1 and βloc ∝ ln G.On one hand, for the short-channel rGO devices,
the diffusive regime
is confirmed since the 1/L behavior is observed when
using (see Figure c, inset). On the
other hand, localization regime is
obtained for longer-channel rGO devices, and the evaluated localization
lengths varies with the number of layers: 7.8 nm for monolayer, 13.7
nm for bilayer, and 22.9 nm for trilayer. Thus, when increasing the
number of layers, hopping transport gives rise to larger transmission
amplitudes compared to diffusion because of the enhancement of , in very good agreement with the
experimental
findings as shown in Figure .
Figure 3
Localization lengths for varying numbers of layers. Circles represent
experimental values, crosses are simulation results. Nlayer ≤ 6 stands for randomly stacked rGO sheets,
and the last data point is for partially oxidized graphite. Experimental values are calculated using different
dielectric
constants. In the case of a single or a few stacked layers, we estimate
ϵ = 2.5 from the average of the
dielectric constant of the substrate (SiO2 = 3.9) and vacuum/air
(= 1),[26] while for RGO thin film we assume
ϵ = 3.5,[27] and ϵ = 15 for partially oxidized
graphite.
Localization lengths for varying numbers of layers. Circles represent
experimental values, crosses are simulation results. Nlayer ≤ 6 stands for randomly stacked rGO sheets,
and the last data point is for partially oxidized graphite. Experimental values are calculated using different
dielectric
constants. In the case of a single or a few stacked layers, we estimate
ϵ = 2.5 from the average of the
dielectric constant of the substrate (SiO2 = 3.9) and vacuum/air
(= 1),[26] while for RGO thin film we assume
ϵ = 3.5,[27] and ϵ = 15 for partially oxidized
graphite.Such behavior agrees well with
experimental findings achieved on
rGO devices with different numbers of layers (Nlayer) and similar chemical structure (i.e., sp2 content 96 ± 1%).[5]Figure collects the results obtained
comparing seven different systems ranging from the single nanosheet
(Nlayer = 1) to a flake of partially oxidized
graphite (Nlayer = 6). Differently, all
the other devices (2 ≤ Nlayer ≤
6) are assemblies of rGO sheets randomly stacked. According with the
results reported in ref (5), all six devices reveal ES-VRH transport mechanisms at low temperatures
(10 K < T < 100 K). Thus, the corresponding
localization length () is calculated
using the temperature-dependent
electrical resistivity curves where ρ0,VRH is a prefactor
for resistivity, ϵr is the relative dielectric constant
of the material, and A = 2.8e2/4πϵ0kB = 0.021 μm–1 K–1 for a 2D system (see Supporting Information for more details). rGO devices have values varying from ca. 4 to 30
nm, showing
the same trend and the same order of magnitude when compared with
the simulations. It is noteworthy to emphasize that in the case of
partially oxidized graphite the corresponding value is 1 order of magnitude
larger amounting
to 250 nm, clearly evidencing the combined role of the crystalline
structure and the dielectric properties. Such aspects are out of the
scope of this work, and some details related to the experimental setup
and the device characterizations are reported in the Supporting Information.The substantial increase in
the localization lengths is thus a
key transport feature to distinguish between various multilayered
rGO devices and which can be rationalized withing the variable range
hopping (VRH) framework.[29] Indeed, at zero
temperature, the energy separation between two localized states should
be very small to enable significant hopping, with probability proportional
to e–2 (with 1/α
being the attenuation length for the localized states and R being the spatial separation of states). The hopping probability
between two states ψ and ψ, which have similar energies and are localized
at the bottom layer well-separated from each other, should thus be
strongly enhanced if a third state ψ is localized at the upper layer and between ψ and ψ. Therefore,
layers with localized states have enhanced transmission when stacked.
In Figure f, the local
density of states (LDOS) is plotted for a trilayer rGO sample.[34] It is clearly visible that states localized
at different layers tend to fill the spatial gaps when they are superimposed.
This can qualitatively explain the enhancement of with number of layers.The
interlayer coupling thus plays a crucial role in multilayer
transport. In low defect concentrations, it is a source of scatterings
which impedes transport, whereas in highly defective rGO multilayers,
it tends to promote longer state delocalization. The contact geometry
is also a major factor in transport across the layers. To gain further
information about the combined roles of interlayer coupling and contact
geometry, we simulate a situation where the device is made from overlapping
bilayer rGO in which the injection and collection takes place at different
layers (inset of Figure ). We compute the conductance with different overlap distances, L, which is also the length of the central region. As shown
in Figure , the conductance
rapidly increases with L at short distances because
the overlap area enhances the probability for a carrier to diffuse
from one layer to the other. Differently, for overlap distances longer
than 10 nm, the conductance decays exponentially with L, indicating that the localization behavior prevails over the interlayer
diffusion. The maximum conductance is achieved at around 7 nm, which
marks the interlayer diffusion length (). We have checked the
dependence of in
clean structures, and found very similar
values, which proves that is dictated by the strength
of interlayer
coupling and not by the disorder content. We can actually estimate
a length scale for interlayer diffusion as hv/γ1 = 11.5 nm, where the
Fermi velocity is v =
106 m/s and the interlayer coupling strength is γ1 = 0.36 eV. The comparison in the simulated structures is
the reason
behind the fact that is weakly
affected from the increase in
the number of layers. On the other hand, since is comparable with the
monolayer localization
length, there is room for localized carriers to further spread over
the neighboring layers. To clarify the effect of contact geometry
on transport, we have considered the electrodes with the same number
of layers as in the central region. In this geometry, as expected,
the conductance increases with the number of layers in both clean
and defective samples, but the behavior of neither nor is considerably affected.
Figure 4
Conductance
as a function of overlap length in bilayer reduced
graphene oxide when the electrodes are connected to different layers.
Dotted curves represent exponential decay.
Conductance
as a function of overlap length in bilayer reduced
graphene oxide when the electrodes are connected to different layers.
Dotted curves represent exponential decay.Finally, based on these findings, the scaling of the resistivity
with the number of layers can be expressed quantitatively. In highly
defective rGO multilayers changes only slightly with the
number of
layers, but increases
linearly with Nlayer. Using the fact that is proportional to the number
of transmission
channels and ,[30,31] one can approximate
the transmission probability across multilayer rGO in terms of that
of the monolayer as . Correspondingly, the resistivities
(ρ)
satisfy the following relationwhere ρ0 = hAmono/2e2L is a system-wide constant Amono being
the cross section area for a monolayer. Specifically, we predict a
linear dependence of ln(ρmulti/Nlayer) ∼ 1/Nlayer for
film thickness larger than the mean free path. For the sake of comparison,
we analyze a data set of 11 rGO devices with similar chemical structure
(i.e., sp2 content = 96 ± 1%) and film thickness ranging
from 2 to 13 nm, i.e., 5 < Nlayer <
35. Note that we do not need to assume any values for Amono and ρ0 or measure them, but they
are used in order to relate resistivity and conductance so as to compare
experimentally measured values with simulated ones through the scaling relation (eq ).Figure shows the
correlation plot ln(ρmulti/Nlayer) vs 1/Nlayer for each device
displaying the resistivity values acquired at different temperatures:
5, 100, and 300 K; the lowest, an intermediate, and the highest measured,
respectively. A total of data sets corresponding to 43 different temperatures
were analyzed, and the remaining 40 curves—not depicted in
the figure—are included between the two curves acquired at
5 and 300 K (dashed area). In all the cases we observe a linear trend y = m·x + q in excellent agreement with eq . Moreover, we determined that the slope m = ln(ρmono/ρ0) decreases
with increasing temperature, while the y-intercept
(q) is a constant value corresponding to ρ0 = exp(q) = (2.1 ± 0.2) × 10–7 Ω·m. Similarly, a linear behavior is achieved
in the case of rGO devices with lower amount of the aromatic content
(77% and 86%, see Figure S9) where the
resistivity values increase with the oxidation degree, as expected.
To summarize the experimental findings, ρmono is
the single-layer resistivity (temperature-dependent), while ρ0 does not depend on the temperature, being therefore a kind
of resistivity scaling factor only depending on the aromatic content
of the device.
Figure 5
Scaling of multilayer resistivity with the number of layers
is
plotted as ln(ρmulti/Nlayer) versus 1/Nlayer. Experimental data
of multilayer rGO (circles for devices reported in ref (5) and square for partially
oxidized graphite) acquired at different temperatures show linear
dependence, in good agreement with the theoretical prediction for
scaling (cf., eq ).
All the linear fitting curves calculated at different temperatures
are included between the two curves acquired at 5 and 300 K (dashed
area).
Scaling of multilayer resistivity with the number of layers
is
plotted as ln(ρmulti/Nlayer) versus 1/Nlayer. Experimental data
of multilayer rGO (circles for devices reported in ref (5) and square for partially
oxidized graphite) acquired at different temperatures show linear
dependence, in good agreement with the theoretical prediction for
scaling (cf., eq ).
All the linear fitting curves calculated at different temperatures
are included between the two curves acquired at 5 and 300 K (dashed
area).
Conclusion
We have reported quantum
simulations on realistic models of multilayered
rGO which reveal the complex interplay between disorder and interlayer
interactions in dictating the dominant transport mechanism. Depending
on the concentration of defects, multilayer interactions can enhance
or suppress the system conductance, which results from the competition
between the mean free path and the interlayer diffusion length . When about 5% of the
carbon atoms are
involved in defected regions, becomes much longer than . In that case, intralayer scattering
largely
dominates over interlayer diffusion, leading to a weak dependence
of on Nlayer.On the other hand, , so that a localized state in one of the
layers has enough extension for tunneling to an adjacent one. If was much larger than , the tunneling rates would be
much smaller.
Once , tunneling
rates are appreciable and charge
delocalization is promoted. While is weakly dependent on Nlayer, increases with Nlayer as expected from a generalization of the Thouless
relationship for
one-dimensional conductors. This unprecedented interplay between transport
length scales is a specific result of 2D layered nature of the multilayer
rGO systems. Such a mechanism enables hopping transport to overcome
the diffusion limit, which is usually the upper bound in bulk systems.
Our theoretical analysis enables us to derive a novel scaling rule,
which is in perfect agreement with experimental data at various temperatures
and consistent with the Thouless relationship. The fundamental findings
of this study are not limited to multilayered reduced graphene oxide
but could find applications in other two-dimensional stacks as well.
Authors: Andrea C Ferrari; Francesco Bonaccorso; Vladimir Fal'ko; Konstantin S Novoselov; Stephan Roche; Peter Bøggild; Stefano Borini; Frank H L Koppens; Vincenzo Palermo; Nicola Pugno; José A Garrido; Roman Sordan; Alberto Bianco; Laura Ballerini; Maurizio Prato; Elefterios Lidorikis; Jani Kivioja; Claudio Marinelli; Tapani Ryhänen; Alberto Morpurgo; Jonathan N Coleman; Valeria Nicolosi; Luigi Colombo; Albert Fert; Mar Garcia-Hernandez; Adrian Bachtold; Grégory F Schneider; Francisco Guinea; Cees Dekker; Matteo Barbone; Zhipei Sun; Costas Galiotis; Alexander N Grigorenko; Gerasimos Konstantatos; Andras Kis; Mikhail Katsnelson; Lieven Vandersypen; Annick Loiseau; Vittorio Morandi; Daniel Neumaier; Emanuele Treossi; Vittorio Pellegrini; Marco Polini; Alessandro Tredicucci; Gareth M Williams; Byung Hee Hong; Jong-Hyun Ahn; Jong Min Kim; Herbert Zirath; Bart J van Wees; Herre van der Zant; Luigi Occhipinti; Andrea Di Matteo; Ian A Kinloch; Thomas Seyller; Etienne Quesnel; Xinliang Feng; Ken Teo; Nalin Rupesinghe; Pertti Hakonen; Simon R T Neil; Quentin Tannock; Tomas Löfwander; Jari Kinaret Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2015-03-21 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: Kevin W Silverstein; Christian E Halbig; Jeremy S Mehta; Anju Sharma; Siegfried Eigler; Jeffrey M Mativetsky Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 7.790