Kairit Zovo1, Hegne Pupart1, Arie Van Wieren2, Richard E Gillilan3, Qingqiu Huang3, Sudipta Majumdar2, Tiit Lukk1. 1. Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia tee 15, Tallinn 12618, Estonia. 2. Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry, Physics and Engineering, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania 15705, United States. 3. MacCHESS (Macromolecular Diffraction Facility at CHESS), Cornell University, 161 Synchrotron Drive, Ithaca, New York 14850, United States.
Abstract
Many industrial processes operate at elevated temperatures or within broad pH and salinity ranges. However, the utilization of enzymes to carry out biocatalysis in such processes is often impractical or even impossible. Laccases (EC 1.10.3.2), which constitute a large family of multicopper oxidases, have long been used in the industrial setting. Although fungal laccases are in many respects considered superior to their bacterial counterparts, the bacterial laccases have been receiving greater attention recently. Albeit lower in redox potential than fungal laccases, bacterial laccases are commonly thermally more stable, act within broader pH ranges, do not contain posttranslational modifications, and could therefore serve as a high potential scaffold for directed evolution for the production of enzymes with enhanced properties. Several examples focusing on the axial ligand mutations of the T1 copper site have been published in the past. However, structural evidence on the local and global changes induced by those mutations have thus far been of computational nature only. In this study, we set out to structurally and kinetically characterize a few of the most commonly reported axial ligand mutations of a bacterial small laccase (SLAC) from Streptomyces coelicolor. While one of the mutations (Met to Leu) equips the enzyme with better thermal stability, the other (Met to Phe) induces an opposite effect. These mutations cause local structural rearrangement of the T1 site as demonstrated by X-ray crystallography. Our analysis confirms past findings that for SLACs, single point mutations that change the identity of the axial ligand of the T1 copper are not enough to provide a substantial increase in the catalytic efficiency but can in some cases have a detrimental effect on the enzyme's thermal stability parameters instead.
Many industrial processes operate at elevated temperatures or within broad pH and salinity ranges. However, the utilization of enzymes to carry out biocatalysis in such processes is often impractical or even impossible. Laccases (EC 1.10.3.2), which constitute a large family of multicopper oxidases, have long been used in the industrial setting. Although fungal laccases are in many respects considered superior to their bacterial counterparts, the bacterial laccases have been receiving greater attention recently. Albeit lower in redox potential than fungal laccases, bacterial laccases are commonly thermally more stable, act within broader pH ranges, do not contain posttranslational modifications, and could therefore serve as a high potential scaffold for directed evolution for the production of enzymes with enhanced properties. Several examples focusing on the axial ligand mutations of the T1 copper site have been published in the past. However, structural evidence on the local and global changes induced by those mutations have thus far been of computational nature only. In this study, we set out to structurally and kinetically characterize a few of the most commonly reported axial ligand mutations of a bacterial small laccase (SLAC) from Streptomyces coelicolor. While one of the mutations (Met to Leu) equips the enzyme with better thermal stability, the other (Met to Phe) induces an opposite effect. These mutations cause local structural rearrangement of the T1 site as demonstrated by X-ray crystallography. Our analysis confirms past findings that for SLACs, single point mutations that change the identity of the axial ligand of the T1 copper are not enough to provide a substantial increase in the catalytic efficiency but can in some cases have a detrimental effect on the enzyme's thermal stability parameters instead.
Laccases (EC 1.10.3.2)
are multicopper oxidases that catalyze the
oxidation of various aromatic compounds by the concomitant four-electron
reduction of molecular oxygen to water.[1−3] Laccases are widespread
in nature with diverse functions. They are found in plants, fungi,
some insects, and bacteria. In plants, laccases participate in lignin
synthesis, wound healing, and iron oxidation. In fungi, laccases have
roles in lignin degradation, morphogenesis, pigmentation, and pathogenesis.
In insects, their function is in sclerotization of cuticles and in
bacteria, they participate in morphogenesis, pathogenicity, melanin
formation, and copper homeostasis.[1,4,5]For enzymatic activity, laccases require four
copper atoms, distributed
between copper centers—a mononuclear and a trinuclear copper
cluster. Copper coordinating ligands are conserved among the species.[4,6,7] Active site coppers are divided
into three types according to their spectroscopic and paramagnetic
properties. The Type-1 (T1) copper has a trigonal coordination with
two histidine residues and one cysteine residue. In addition, it has
a weakly coordinating or non-coordinating residue in the axial position.
Laccases that have a non-coordinating residue (Phe or Leu) in the
axial position (fungal laccases) generally have higher redox potential
values compared to their bacterial counterparts.[8] Type 2 (T2) and two Type 3 (T3) copper ions form a trinuclear
cluster (TNC) and are coordinated by eight histidine residues. The
substrate is oxidized near the T1 site, electrons are then transferred
one by one along a pathway containing Cys and His residues to the
TNC, where molecular oxygen is reduced to water.[1,2]The most studied laccases are of fungal origin, having three domains
and are monomeric. In 2004, Machczynski et al. described a structurally
different laccase from soil bacteria Streptomyces coelicolor containing two domains per monomer. The new type of laccase was
named the small laccase (SLAC). The SLAC from the soil dwelling actinomycete S. coelicolor (ScSLAC) also utilizes
four copper atoms distributed between the two clusters and the copper
coordinating ligands are located in the same relative positions as
compared to other laccases.[9] The active
form of ScSLAC is homotrimeric, containing 12 copper
atoms per trimer. The T1 copper atom is located in domain 2 and the
TNC is located at the interface of domain 1 and 2 of the neighboring
polypeptide chains, structurally mimicking the domains 2 and 3 of
the large laccase from fungi.[10]Both
fungal and bacterial laccases have broad substrate specificities
making them suitable for various biotechnological and industrial applications.[5,11,12] Therefore, laccases have been
extensively studied as the eco-friendly (water as the only byproduct)
multipurpose enzymes to replace conventional industrial methods with
sustainable approaches to reduce the environmental impact. Fungal
laccases are industrially used for diverse purposes. In food industry,
they are used as stabilizers or additives to improve food sensory
parameters and in textile industry as a bleaching agent or to dye
fabrics with heteropolymeric dyes.[12] Fungal
laccases are not only used in organic synthesis to synthesize pharmacologically
important compounds but also find uses in bioremediation, cosmetics,
nanotechnology, and biomedicine.[5,12,13] Additionally, laccases have been studied for their potential in
biomass pretreatment for enzymatic delignification in biorefinery
or as a substitute for some of the chemical catalysts required for
pulp and paper processing.[8,14]Fungal laccases,
in general, have higher redox potentials than
bacterial laccases,[15,16] yet bacterial laccases have wide
pH tolerance range, better tolerance of elevated temperatures, increased
tolerance to different organic solvents and metal ions, which makes
them attractive candidates for industrial uses.[11,13,17−19] Increasing number of
studies are showing that bacterial laccases can be useful for industrial
applications. Bacterial laccases have been studied to carry out decolorization
of dyes (textile industry) and pollutant degradation (bioremediation).[13] Bacterial laccases can be useful in paper pulp
bio-bleaching and wastewater treatment[19] as well as biomass delignification.[11,20] In addition
to treating grassy biomass, laccases from Streptomyces could potentially to be useful in lignin degradation from woody
biomass as well. ScSLAC was implicated in the ability
to depolymerize lignin from Miscanthus x giganteus by increasing the amount of acid-precipitable polymeric lignin (APPL)
in its growth environment.[21] SLAC from Amycolatopsis sp. 75iv3 was able to degrade steam-pretreated
poplar by increasing the amount of APPL while leading to the reduction
of its molecular weight by 50%.[22] Bacterial
strains harboring the genes that encode laccases have been studied
as promising tools for large-scale utilization and conversion of lignin
to more valuable products.[19,23] However, the oxidizing
potential of bacterial laccases on lignin depolymerization is not
high enough to meet the industrial needs. Further optimization using
molecular biology tools is therefore necessary. Several studies have
shown that the redox potential of laccases can be tuned and the range
of catalytically active substrates increased by rational design.[15,24−30] Using molecular dynamics simulations, Hong et al. predicted that
the replacement of the axial Met residue in ScSLAC
would increase the redox potential of that enzyme.[25] One of the main targets has been the T1 Cu site and modifications
in its immediate vicinity for catalytic improvement.[8] The idea of tuning the redox potential of enzymes belonging
to the cupredoxin fold by modifying the identity of just the axial
ligand of the T1 copper is not new and substitution of that residue
has been proven as an effective measure for the enzymes’ overall
catalytic improvement.[31,32]Additionally, Sherif et
al. used site-directed mutagenesis to mutate
17 amino acid residues, including 10 histidine residues, a cysteine,
and a methionine residue from the copper coordination sphere of ScSLAC. All the mutations reduced enzyme activity, confirming
the importance of copper coordinating residues. M298A mutation reduced
the enzyme activity by 35%. The Y229A and Y230A mutants showed over
10-fold increase in activity compared with the wild type laccase.[18] Gupta et al. investigated the role of Y108 in ScSLAC. Y108A and Y108F mutations reduced the turnover number
but did not affect the catalytic efficiency. Y108 is situated ∼5
Å away from the T2 Cu ion and is involved in oxygen reduction.[33] Prins et al. mutated the axial M298 T1 copper
ligand of ScSLAC to phenylalanine, which decreased
the turnover rate and overall efficiency; however, the enzyme showed
higher efficiency at temperatures above 70 °C.[17]The aim of the current study was to gain structural
insights into
the previously characterized mutants of the axial ligand to the T1
copper. In addition to re-investigating their kinetic parameters at
elevated temperatures, we report lowered resistance to elevated temperatures
in longer time-course experiments than what had been reported in previous
studies. Here, we determined the X-ray crystal structures of M298F
and M298L single mutants (to 2.2 Å resolution), and the M198F
M298F double mutant (to 2.0 Å resolution) to study the effects
of mutagenesis induced local displacements around the T1 copper site.
We also performed small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to identify
possible larger scale motions that would have possibly been frozen
out due to crystal packing interactions.
Results
Determination
of Local Structural Displacements
The
first crystal structure of the bacterial SLAC was published in 2009.[10] Since then, several attempts have been made
to increase the catalytic efficiency and thermal stability of the
SLACs via structure guided site-directed mutagenesis. Multiple sequence
alignments of the high redox potential large laccases from fungi and
of bacterial laccases reveal that copper binding residues at the T1
and T2/T3 sites are highly conserved. However, one distinct feature
that differentiates the low redox potential enzymes from the more
efficient fungal counterparts—the identity of the axial ligand
to the T1 copper (Figure A,B). Several examples can be found from the literature that
deal explicitly with mutations to the T1 copper site for enhanced
function.[25,27,30] It has been
hypothesized that the identity of the axial ligand may be one of the
key determinants in tuning the redox potential of the enzyme.[34] However, thus far only one crystal structure
of an axial ligand mutant[35] of a SLAC and
a few computational models[25] have been
published. Motivated by the scarcity of structural information, we
set out to determine if and how the changes in the axial ligand identity
of the SLAC affect the enzyme structurally in local and global context
that may serve to explain the rather modest gains or even losses in
activity/redox potential and the loss of thermal stability of those
mutants.
Figure 1
(A) Partial structure-based multiple sequence alignment of the
mononuclear copper site of two bacterial (2-domain S. coelicolor and 3-domain B. subtilis) and two fungal laccases (2-domain from T. versicolor and C. cinereus). The axial ligand
to the T1 copper is highlighted with a red box and its stabilizing
interaction partner with a green box; (B) T1 copper interaction partners
for the small and large laccases from bacteria and fungi; axial ligand
and their stabilizing interaction partner are in red and green, respectively.
(A) Partial structure-based multiple sequence alignment of the
mononuclear copper site of two bacterial (2-domain S. coelicolor and 3-domain B. subtilis) and two fungal laccases (2-domain from T. versicolor and C. cinereus). The axial ligand
to the T1 copper is highlighted with a red box and its stabilizing
interaction partner with a green box; (B) T1 copper interaction partners
for the small and large laccases from bacteria and fungi; axial ligand
and their stabilizing interaction partner are in red and green, respectively.Here, we solved the X-ray crystal structures of
the T1 copper axial
ligand mutants of ScSLAC, where the identity of the
mutated residues was chosen based on previously determined crystal
structures of high redox potential fungal laccases: leucine for Coprinus cinereus (CcLAC)[36] and phenylalanine for Trametes
versicolor (TvLAC).[37] As all structures of the mutant enzymes under study were
solved in the cubic P213 lattice, for
comparison accuracy, the structure of the wild-type ScSLAC was re-determined in the same point group symmetry as to exclude
the possibility of differences arising from alternative crystal packing
of the previously published structures.[10,38] Substitution
of the methionine axial ligand of the wild type ScSLAC for a branched hydrophobic leucine or an aromatic phenylalanine
moiety introduced a loop displacement where instead of the expected
cation–hydrophobic interaction or a cation−π interaction,
we see the ligand shift away from the catalytic metal ion.More
specifically, in case of the M298F mutation, where the structural
effects are more pronounced, the loop carrying the axial ligand is
displaced by 1.35 Å when measuring distances of the Cα-s of residue 298 between wild type and mutant enzyme (Figure A4). When comparing the distances
of C2 of the phenylalanine ring of F463 of TvLAC
to the T1 copper with the respective C2 of the M298F mutant, the distance
increases from 3.65 Å (TvLAC) to 6.72 Å
(M298F) swinging the phenylalanine side chain completely out of the
view and leaving the T1 site relatively open to solvent (Figure B1). The M298L mutation,
which mimics the T1 site of CcLAC has a less pronounced
effect on the movement of the same loop—0.35 Å between
Cα-s of WT and M298L mutant (Figure ). The distance of the Cα of the leucine residue to T1 copper is elongated to 4.36 Å
when compared to the L462-Cα to T1 copper distance
of 3.5 Å of in CcLAC (Figure B2). Prior to having solved the crystal structure
of the M298F mutant, we hypothesized that M198 could serve as the
spatial homolog of F337 of TvLAC. In the TvLAC structure (PDB code 1GYC), the axial ligand of T1 copper F463
is stabilized via a weak π–π stacking interaction
with F337 (Figure B3). We therefore hypothesized that a double mutant of M198F M298F
might be able to mimic that interaction and similarly lead to stabilization
of the axial ligand. The structural homolog of that phenylalanine
(F340) is conserved in CcLAC and forms a hydrophobic
interaction with the axial L462 (Figure B4). In spite of our expectations to see
those phenylalanines complementing each other, there is an even greater
displacement of the loop carrying the axial ligand in the M198F M298F
mutant by almost 2.1 Å between Cα-s of position
298 (Figure A4). Albeit
M198F remained in place and C2 of the phenylalanine ring aligns with
the sulfur of the methionine side chain, M298F is swung back even
further, where the C2 of the M298F phenyl ring distance from T1 copper
measures 7.66 Å (Figure B3). Therefore, rather unexpectedly, the introduction of a
bulky hydrophobic residue into ScSLAC in place of
the methionine axial ligand introduces an unwanted displacement of
its carrying loop and destabilizes that local region.
Figure 2
(A) From left to right:
omit maps from the T1 copper site (contoured
at 4σ above background) calculated with the Fourier coefficients
(Fobs – Fcalc) with phases from the final models but with the coordinates
of the M198/M298/Cu (wild type, beige), L298/Cu (M289L mutant, magenta),
F298/Cu (M298F mutant, green), and F198/M298/Cu (M198F/M298F double
mutant, gold) omitted prior to calculations, respectively. The coordinates
of the final models of mutants are superimposed with corresponding
maps and with the coordinates of wild-type ScSLAC for comparison accuracy.
Displacement distance between the Cα-s of the mutated
axial ligand are marked with a contoured line. (B) Overlays of the
poses for the T1 site of (1) TvLAC with M298F mutant
(cyan-green), (2) CcLAC with M298L mutant (cyan-magenta),
(3) TvLAC with M198F/M298F double mutant (cyan/gold),
and (4) BsLAC with TvLAC (cyan-green).
(A) From left to right:
omit maps from the T1 copper site (contoured
at 4σ above background) calculated with the Fourier coefficients
(Fobs – Fcalc) with phases from the final models but with the coordinates
of the M198/M298/Cu (wild type, beige), L298/Cu (M289L mutant, magenta),
F298/Cu (M298F mutant, green), and F198/M298/Cu (M198F/M298F double
mutant, gold) omitted prior to calculations, respectively. The coordinates
of the final models of mutants are superimposed with corresponding
maps and with the coordinates of wild-type ScSLAC for comparison accuracy.
Displacement distance between the Cα-s of the mutated
axial ligand are marked with a contoured line. (B) Overlays of the
poses for the T1 site of (1) TvLAC with M298F mutant
(cyan-green), (2) CcLAC with M298L mutant (cyan-magenta),
(3) TvLAC with M198F/M298F double mutant (cyan/gold),
and (4) BsLAC with TvLAC (cyan-green).In contrast to substitutions such as these having been demonstrated
as a viable strategy to improve a bacterial large laccase,[24]ScSLAC likely requires additional
tweaking of the surroundings of the axial ligand to accept a bulky
hydrophobic residue in that position. Likely, the reason why the axial
ligand substitution worked for the three-domain laccase from Bacillus subtilis is because it contains the structural
homolog of F337 of TvLAC or F340 of CcLAC, which in case of the CotA laccase is a leucine and occupies
the same structural space as the fungal enzymes (Figure B4). The replacement of the
axial methionine residue with a hydrophobic leucine that is similar
in size to the original methionine moiety does not disturb, nor introduce
novel interactions that would otherwise lead to major displacements
in its local environment. It has been reported that the methionine
to leucine mutation in bacterial SLACs results only in modest gains
in the redox potential of the T1 center.[24,35] Although hydrophobic interactions or the introduction of those therein
can be useful in tuning the redox potentials of T1 copper centers,[39] our analysis confirms past findings[24,35] that a single point mutation alone in the primary coordination sphere
of the T1 copper center is not enough to achieve substantially increased
redox potential or enhanced catalytic activity of ScSLAC. Such mutations can instead have detrimental effects on the
catalytic efficiency of the enzyme and on its overall thermal stability.[18] The unsuitability of the local environment to
accept a bulky hydrophobic residue in the axial position becomes clear
from the solved X-ray crystal structures as undesirable changes in
the local environment become visible when comparing mutants to the
wild-type enzymes of the mutation templates (i.e., fungal enzymes)
(Figure B1–3).
Figure 3
Heat inactivation profiles as determined for wild type
and axial
ligands in the presence of ABTS substrate at 70 °C. Some level
of protection against heat-inactivation can be achieved by mutating
the axial Met (blue circles) to a Leu residue (pink circles). Double
mutant of M198F/M298F (MFMF) is the most susceptible to heat inactivation.
Heat inactivation profiles as determined for wild type
and axial
ligands in the presence of ABTS substrate at 70 °C. Some level
of protection against heat-inactivation can be achieved by mutating
the axial Met (blue circles) to a Leu residue (pink circles). Double
mutant of M198F/M298F (MFMF) is the most susceptible to heat inactivation.
Probing for Global Perturbations
X-ray crystal structures
are typically considered as rigid snapshots of protein molecules that
have been constrained into a crystal lattice, which remains particularly
constrained when considering cryo-crystallography. Carrying out crystallographic
experiments at elevated temperatures will unfreeze some conformational
states (rotameric, local loop movements) within the protein crystal
structure which do not translate to observable large-scale domain
motions due to crystal packing.[40] In order
to produce a version of the SLAC in its most native form possible,
we tested two alternative methods for bacterial cell lysis. Although
many consider the French press as the mild go-to method for cell lysis
as the sample experiences little to no thermal changes during the
cell lysis, pressure differences required for the complete and effective
disruption of bacterial cells are in the order of 1 kbar. Albeit not
widely reported, some proteins can undergo pressure induced denaturation.[41] Thus, for SAXS experiments, we set out to test
two sets of protein samples—those from lysis performed at an
ambient pressure over ice using sonication and those from using the
French press for lysis at ambient temperature. In this study, we refer
to wild-type sonicated sample as “WTS” and wild-type
French press sample as “WTF.” Similarly, mutants that
are either sonicated or subjected to the French press have an “S”
or “F” appended, respectively. Thus, M298F is referred
to as “MFS” or “MFF” and M298L is referred
to as “MLS” or “MLF.”Size-exclusion
chromatography-coupled SAXS was performed on all samples to confirm
sample purity and produce buffer-subtracted profiles free from radiation
damage. Single symmetric elution peaks were observed with radii of
gyration that were visually indistinguishable among the five samples
and level throughout the peaks (Figure S1). The samples varied somewhat in concentration (elusion peak height)
with the wild type being the most dilute. The Guinier plots of the
profiles are linear and show no obvious systematic deviations that
would indicate aggregation or concentration effects (Figure S2).To make a more precise statistical comparison,
all profiles were
aligned by scaling to equivalent I(0) values and
the χ2 statistic was subsequently calculated relative
to the wild type (WTS). As a result, χ2 = 1.06 (WTS-WTF),
1.18 (MFF-WTF), 1.31 (MFS-WTF), 1.13 (MLF-WTF), and 1.37 (MLS-WTF).
Though close to unity, the χ2 values suggest that
sonication may introduce some changes in the mutant profiles. Radii
of gyration computed by the Guinier analysis were Rg = 30.10 ± 0.07 Å (WTF), 30.03 ± 0.11
Å (WTS), 30.13 ± 0.06 Å (MFF), 30.15 ± 0.04 Å
(MFS), 30.18 ± 0.05 Å (MLF), and 30.28 ± 0.04 Å
(MLS). The error bounds here are based on the Guinier linear fit and
represent approximately ± 1 standard deviation. In Figure , the wild-type and M298F mutants
show no significant difference in Rg between
the sonication and French press treatments. The sonicated M298L mutant
(MLS) produces a significantly higher Rg compared to the other samples.
Figure 4
Radii of gyration (Rg) with ±
1 σ for error bars for wild-type (WT) and mutants (M298F, M298L)
with a side-by-side comparison of sonication (S) and the French press
(F) treatments. The M298L mutant, which appears to have a slightly
higher Rg than the other samples, responded
differently to the two treatments.
Radii of gyration (Rg) with ±
1 σ for error bars for wild-type (WT) and mutants (M298F, M298L)
with a side-by-side comparison of sonication (S) and the French press
(F) treatments. The M298L mutant, which appears to have a slightly
higher Rg than the other samples, responded
differently to the two treatments.The Kratky plots of the profiles all overlap visually to within
the noise limits, are unimodal, and fall back to the baseline at high q-value. This behavior is characteristic of a compact, well-folded
globular protein. While the WTF and MLS pairs differ most in both
χ2 and Rg values, their
Kratky plots are difficult to distinguish at the current experimental
noise level (Figure ).
Figure 5
Kratky plot of the wild type French pressed protein (WTF) compared
to the M298L mutant prepared by sonication (MLS). Though the two curves
differ slightly according to the radius and gyration and χ2 (1.36), the profiles are difficult to distinguish at the
current level of experimental noise.
Kratky plot of the wild type French pressed protein (WTF) compared
to the M298L mutant prepared by sonication (MLS). Though the two curves
differ slightly according to the radius and gyration and χ2 (1.36), the profiles are difficult to distinguish at the
current level of experimental noise.
Point Mutations Affect Thermal Stability
Because laccases
have tremendous potential for industrial use, improving their catalytic
properties for use in environments that operate at elevated temperatures
is desirable for biotechnological enzymes to have long-term thermal
stability. Structural basis for T1 site instability of the bacterial
SLAC in the mutant enzymes seems to stem from the generally less hydrophobic
local environment of the axial ligand when compared to the large laccases.
Comparatively less hydrophobic immediate vicinity of the T1 site in
SLACs is likely the reason why substitution of the axial ligand with
an increasingly more hydrophobic residue leads to substantial local
structural reorganization. Incubation of mutant enzymes at different
temperatures for extended periods of time, followed by measurement
of relative baseline activity with two model substrates (ABTS and
DMP) revealed that only the M298L mutation had protective effects
against heat inactivation (Figure ). Comparing the heat inactivation half-lives (τ1/2) at 70 °C, the relative activity of M298L when compared
to wild-type ScSLAC is extended from 3.5 to 5.4 h
(Table ). A two-factor
ANOVA test was carried out in order to compare thermal stabilities
of the WT enzyme and M298L mutant. ANOVA results confirmed that the
difference in activities of the enzymes is statistically significant Fcrit < F (5.6 < 9.6)
at a 0.95 significance level, p = 0.02. As for the
M298F single and the M198F/M298F double mutant, introduction of the
bulky hydrophobic residue decreases the τ1/2 at 70
°C to about a half and a quarter hour, respectively, when compared
to the 3.5 h of wild-type. The protective effect of M298L mutation
is also measurable at 80 °C, where heat inactivation τ1/2 is extended from 1.5 to 2.7 h when compared with the wild-type
enzyme (Figure S3).
Table 1
Heat-Inactivation Half-Lives (τ1/2) in Hours as
Calculated for Wild-Type and Axial Ligand
Mutants of the ScSLAC Enzymea
80 °C
70 °C
60 °C
ScSLAC
1.5 ± 0.2
3.5 ± 0.3
M298F
0.6 ± 0.1
4.7 ± 0.6
M298L
2.7 ± 0.4
5.4 ± 0.4
M198F/M298F
0.3 ± 0.01
2.1 ± 0.2
The curves were
fitted and standard
deviations calculated by the exponential decay function in the OriginPro
software package.
The curves were
fitted and standard
deviations calculated by the exponential decay function in the OriginPro
software package.
Point Mutations
to the Axial Ligand Have but Limited Effect
on Kinetic Parameters
All of the steady-state kinetics were
determined at 42 °C, and even though differences between mutant
and wild type enzymes within the limited range of tested substrates
exist, these differences can only be considered as mild-to-moderate
(Table ). Previous
studies on the axial ligand mutations of ScSLAC,
which focused efforts on the determination of redox potentials of
those mutants, seem to confirm the notion that only minor effects
can be observed in either slightly improved or slightly worsened values.
Based on the now available structural info, we hypothesize that these
effects can be attributed to the small local structural perturbations
that are brought about by hydrophobic–hydrophilic repulsions
about the axial ligand and the lack of favorable hydrogen-bonding
interaction partners on the peptide backbone of the ligand-carrying
loop.
Table 2
Steady State Kinetic Parameters as
Determined for Wild Type and Axial Ligand Mutants of the ScSLAC Enzyme
at 42 °Ca
42 °C
ABTS
DMP
Pyrogallol
hydrocoerulignone
ScSLAC
kcat = 38.6 s–1
kcat = 4.2 s–1
kcat = 17.2 s–1
kcat = 11.3 s–1
Km = 7.3 ± 0.26 mM
Km = 1.1 ± 0.06 mM
Km = 0.2 ± 0.06 mM
Km = 0.3 ± 0.05 mM
kcat/Km = 5.3 × 103 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 3.8 × 103 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 8.6 × 104 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 3.8 × 104 s–1 M–1
ScSLAC
kcat = 3.7 s–1
kcat = 0.7 s–1
kcat = 21.9 s–1
kcat = 5.4 s–1
M298F
Km = 4.1 ± 0.24 mM
Km = 1.2 ± 0.19 mM
Km = 0.3 ± 0.09 mM
Km = 0.3 ± 0.05 mM
kcat/Km = 0.9 × 103 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 0.6 × 103 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 7.3 × 104 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 1.8 × 104 s–1 M–1
ScSLAC
kcat = 9.3 s–1
kcat = 1.5 s–1
kcat = 21.9 s–1
kcat = 7.2 s–1
M298L
Km = 5.0 ± 0.22 mM
Km = 1.3 ± 0.09 mM
Km = 0.3 ± 0.12 mM
Km = 0.3 ± 0.05 mM
kcat/Km = 1.9 × 103 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 1.2 × 103 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 7.3 × 104 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 2.4 × 104 s–1 M–1
ScSLAC
kcat = 3.9 s–1
kcat = 0.8 s–1
kcat = 26.3 s–1
kcat = 5.6 s–1
M198F
Km = 1.1 ± 0.04 mM
Km = 1.1 ± 0.08 mM
Km = 0.5 ± 0.07 mM
Km = 0.1 ± 0.02 mM
M298F
kcat/Km = 3.5 × 103 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 0.7 × 103 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 5.3 × 104 s–1 M–1
kcat/Km = 5.6 × 104 s–1 M–1
All measurements
were carried out
in triplicate.
All measurements
were carried out
in triplicate.
Discussion
Laccases are an important class of enzymes with tremendous potential
for use in different industrial processes. While fungal laccases have
excellent performance characteristics within a limited pH and temperature
range, the bacterial laccases tend to operate in much broader environmental
conditions, albeit with poorer performance. Past research studies
into the engineering of the SLAC have relied mostly on computational
methods and direct measurements of redox potentials as well as enzyme
kinetics on common laccase substrates. Here, we have provided first
structural insights into the structural perturbations that are brought
about due to mutations of the axial ligand. SAXS measurements indicate
that the mutations do not alter the global folding or solution state
of the protein. The comparison of wild type proteins processed by
sonication and the French press do not show any large-scale structural
differences in solution. Some subtle structural change is evident
the χ2 statistics for the sonicated M298F and M298L
mutants and the difference is further evidenced in the Rg for M298L. However, given the subtle nature of the changes,
it is not possible under the current experimental conditions to draw
conclusions about the nature of structural changes. The result is
consistent with the long-standing view that the French press is gentler
on samples than sonication. It may be that mutant proteins less stable
than the wild type are more susceptible to harsh treatment. A further
study is warranted.The results from X-ray crystallography combined
with thermal stability
assays seem to indicate that the larger and more hydrophobic residues
not only perturb the local environment of the T1 site but also indicate
that there is a fine balance between the distancing of the axial ligand
to copper atom and the mutant’s thermal stability. The distance
of the M298L residue to copper atom is only slightly increased from
the position of wild-type’s M298—nevertheless a change
of this magnitude seems to play a role in improving the enzymes’
thermal inactivation half-life. However, a greater distance from the
T1 copper atom that can be seen for M298F seems to perturb the local
environment so much so that the tight coordination of copper atom
is affected at elevated temperatures, resulting in thermal inactivation
half-lives seven-fold shorter than with the wild-type enzyme. That
effect is even more pronounced for the M198F/M298F double mutant,
where the heat-inactivation half-life is reduced by almost thirteen-fold
when compared to wild-type enzyme. Having concrete structural information
from X-ray crystallography on the active site geometry will therefore
enable the establishment of better parameters on the redesign of SLACs
with enhanced thermal and catalytic properties.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
2,2′-Azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic
acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (MA, USA);
2,6-dimethoxyphenol (DMP) from Acros Organics (NJ, USA), pyrogallol,
and dimethylformamide were purchased from Fisher Chemical (Loughborough,
UK); hydrocoerulignone (HCL) and isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside
(IPTG) were obtained from MP Biomedicals, LCC (Illkirch, France);
and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was purchased from Amresco (Ohio, USA).
Cloning and Mutagenesis of ScSLAC
The gene
encoding the SLAC from S. coelicolor A3(2) was cloned into pET15b (Novagen) to create the expression
vector p15-ScSLAC as described before.[21]
Mutagenesis
The plasmid p15-ScSLAC was used as the
DNA template to generate two ScSLAC single mutants M298F and M298L
using a Q5 site-directed mutagenesis kit (NEB). The plasmids in Table were used to mutate
methionine codon ATG at position 298 to phenylalanine codon TTC and
leucine codon CTG, respectively. The PCR mixture (10 μL) contained
1 μL of 10 ng/μL template DNA plasmid, 1 μL each
of 5 μM forward and reverse primers, 5 μL of Q5 HS master
mix, and 2 μL of ddH2O. The PCRs were performed in
a BioRad T100 thermal cycler with the following parameters: 98 °C
for 30 s followed by 25 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 70 °C
for 20 s and 72 °C for 3 m, and a final extension time of 2 m
at 72 °C. The PCR reactions were confirmed by DNA gel electrophoresis.
The KLD reactions were performed at room temperature for 10 min with
0.5 μL of the amplified PCR product, 2.5 μL of KLD reaction
buffer, 1.5 μL of ddH2O, and 0.5 μL of KLD
enzyme mixture. 2.5 μL of KLD mixtures were chemically transformed
into 5-alpha competent Escherichia coli cells. The mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing (Genewiz,
USA).The M198F M298F double mutant was generated following
the same protocol as described for single mutant generation using
the p15-ScSLAC-M298F single mutant as the PCR template and ScSLAC-M198F-FP
and ScSLAC-M198F-RP primers (Table ).
Table 3
Primer Sequences for the Generation
of Axial Ligand Mutants of ScSLAC
primer
sequence
ScSLAC-M298F-FP
5′-CGACATGGGCTTCGTGGGGCTGTTC-3′
ScSLAC-M298F-RP
5′-GAGTGGCTCTGGACGTGG-3′
ScSLAC-M298L-FP
5′-CGACATGGGCCTGGTGGGGCTGT-3′
ScSLAC-M298L-RP
5′-GAGTGGCTCTGGACGTGGC-3′
ScSLAC-M198F-FP
5′-CTTCAACGACTTCACCATCAACAACCGCAAG-3′
ScSLAC-M198F-RP
5′-ACGATCGTGTGCGTGGCG-3′
Protein Expression and
Purification
Wild-type ScSLAC and its mutants
were expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3)
cells (Novagen). Three mL of the
starter cultures was inoculated into 500 mL of Luria–Bertani
(LB) media containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin. The cultures were
incubated at 37 °C with shaking (180 rpm) until OD600 = 0.6. Protein expression was induced with IPTG (final concentration
0.5 mM). After induction, the cells were incubated overnight at 30
°C with shaking (180 rpm). Cells were harvested by centrifugation
(Beckman Coulter Avanti; rotor: JLA-16-250) and pellets were stored
at −20 °C until further use. The cells were suspended
in a lysis buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, 0.5 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole,
pH 7.5) and passed five times through an EmulsiFlex-C5 high pressure
homogenizer (Avestin). An extra batch of cells were lysed using sonication
to exclude the possibility of pressure-induced unfolding of the protein.
The cells were thus sonicated at 20% power and a pulse sequence of
5 on, 10 off with a Bandelin Sonoplus sonicator and a UW 2200 tip.
The lysate was centrifuged at 35,000g for 50 min
(Beckman Coulter Avanti, rotor: JA-20). The centrifuged lysate was
loaded on the Ni-sepharose affinity chromatography column (HisTrap
FF, 5 mL, GE Healthcare). The column was washed with 10 column volumes
(CV) of 10% buffer B (20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5 M NaCl,
500 mM Imidazole) to wash out nonspecifically bound protein. The His-tagged
protein was eluted with a 10–100% linear gradient of buffer
B in 20 CV. The eluate was collected and incubated with thrombin (GE
Healthcare) overnight at 4 °C. Five molar equivalents of copper
were added to the sample and incubated for 1 h. The sample was then
desalted (HiPrep 26/10 Desalting, GE Healthcare) and further purified
with anion exchange chromatography (HiTrap DEAE FF, 5 mL, GE Healthcare).
The enzyme was subsequently desalted and concentrated (Vivaspin Turbo
15, MWCO 10K, Sartorius). Protein concentration was determined at
λ = 280 nm using ε = 43,890 M–1 cm–1 (UV-2700 UV–Vis Spectrophotometer, Shimadzu).
Kinetics
Oxidation of substrates was monitored with
a UV-2700 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu) in a 1 mL plastic cuvette at
42 °C using a temperature-controlled cell holder (TCC-100, Shimadzu).
The optimal pH was determined for every substrate and the following
parameters were used: (1) 0.1–25 mM ABTS pH 5.0 (λ =
420 nm; ε = 36,000 M–1 cm–1), 0.25–15 mM DMP pH 8.0 (λ = 470 nm; ε = 14,800
M–1 cm–1), 0.025–1 mM pyrogallol
pH 8.5 (λ = 420 nm; ε = 2640 M–1 cm–1), and 0.025–2 mM hydrocoerulignone pH 8.5
(λ = 475 nm; ε = 53,200 M–1 cm–1). The ABTS stock solution was prepared in double deionized water,
DMP and pyrogallol were dissolved in dimethylformamide and hydrocoerulignone
in DMSO. Kinetic constants were calculated by fitting data to Michaelis–Menten
or substrate inhibition equations (Origin 2018b, Northampton, MA,
USA).
Thermostability of ScSLAC and Its Mutants
Enzyme stock
solutions (in 20 mM Tris–HCl 0.1 M NaCl pH 7.5) were incubated
at 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 °C. Enzyme solutions were then diluted
500 times into a 1 mL plastic cuvette containing 2 mM ABTS and 50
mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 5.0 (ScSLAC, M298F, and M298L) or pH
4.5 (M198F M298F) at 42 °C. Residual activity of the enzymes
were measured at different time points by monitoring the oxidation
of 2 mM ABTS at 420 nm.
Protein Crystallization
Both wild-type
and mutants
of ScSLAC were crystallized using the hanging drop
vapor diffusion method at 20 °C. In case of wild type enzymes
and single mutants (M298F and M298L), the mother liquor was composed
of 40% MPD, 200 mM NH4–OAc and 100 mM HEPES (pH
7.5) and was mixed with protein (20 mg/mL in 20 mM Tris–HCl
buffer) in a 1:2 ratio. Crystals with approximate dimensions of 300
× 300 × 300 μm were formed in 48 h after incubation
in a vibration free crystallization incubator (Molecular Dimensions,
Sheffield, UK). The double mutant of ScSLAC (M198F-M298F) was crystallized
similarly, where the mother liquor was composed of 40% PEG400, 200
mM Li2SO4, and 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.5).
Prior to data collection, crystals were vitrified in liquid nitrogen
without any additional cryoprotectants.
Data Collection and Structure
Determination
The diffraction
data for the wild type enzyme was recorded on a Rigaku Compact HomeLab
diffractometer with a MicroMax-003 sealed-tube Cu-anode source (1.54
Å radiation), a 4-circle partial-chi goniometer, and a Saturn
944 + CCD detector. The crystals diffracted to 2.7 Å resolution
and conformed to the P213 space group.
Similarly, crystals of the mutant versions of the enzyme also conformed
to the P213 space group. The diffraction
data for M298L and M198F-M298F double mutant were collected on a BL13-XALOC
beamline at the ALBA Synchrotron light source (Barcelona, Spain) to
a resolution of 2.2 and 2.0 Å resolution, respectively, on a
Dectris Pilatus 6M detector. For M298F, the data set diffracting to
2.2 Å resolution was collected on the F1 beamline at the Cornell
High Energy Synchrotron Source (Ithaca, NY, USA) using an ADSC Quantum
270 detector. Diffraction intensities were integrated with XDS[42] and scaled with Aimless.[43] For structure determination of all respective structures,
the molecular replacement with PHASER[44] was carried out, using input diffraction data, sequence information,
and the atomic coordinates of the previously deposited structure of ScSLAC (PDB ID 3CG8). To minimize phase bias in the generated electron
density maps, sites containing mutations in the search model were
truncated to β-carbon. Iterative cycles of manual and automatic
refinement with COOT[45] and PHENIX[46] were carried out. Crystallographic statistics
are summarized in Table .
Table 4
Data Collection and Refinement Statistics
Related to Figure
WT ScSLAC
M298L
M298F
M198F/M298F
Data Collection
wavelength (Å)
1.5419
0.97917
0.97820
0.97917
space group
P213
P213
P213
P213
unit cell (a,b,c) (Å)
176.98
177.2
177.62
178.64
resolution range
(Å)a
29.5–2.7 (2.79–2.70)
72.34–2.19 (2.23–2.19)
30–2.2 (2.26–2.2)
29.77–2.0 (2.03–2.0)
total reflections
376482
543286
808727
2518974
unique reflections
50726
94266
92609
128318
multiplicity
7.4 (7.4)
5.8 (6.0)
8.7 (4.3)
19.6 (20.2)
completeness (%)
99.9 (99.6)
99.2 (99.5)
98.1 (86.3)
100.0 (99.8)
mean I/sigma (I)
10.1 (3.0)
7.1
(2.6)
16.50 (1.69)
24.6 (4.7)
R-merge (%)b
15.4 (69.5)
14.8 (65.3)
8.5 (80.5)
8.1 (67.3)
R-meas (%)
18.0 (81.3)
17.8 (79.2)
9.0 (90.7)
8.5 (70.8)
CC1/2
0.995 (0.899)
0.987
(0.750)
99.9 (65.2)
0.999 (0.939)
Refinement
resolution (Å)
29.5–2.7
62.65–2.2
29.2–2.2
29.77–2.0
number
of reflections
50,613
94,160
92,558
128,253
R-work
20.0
15.2
17.1
14.6
R-freec
22.2
16.2
18.5
15.8
number of atoms
4645
4983
4618
5078
protein
4284
4472
4397
4386
Cu
6
8
8
8
water
355
503
213
658
other
0
0
0
26
Average B-Factor
macromolecules
35.2
31.2
41.6
31.5
Cu
40.2
39.8
64.8
33.9
solvent
39.9
44.2
43.0
43.3
RMS (bond lengths)
0.008
0.007
0.009
0.007
RMS (bond angles)
0.932
0.886
1.190
0.883
favored (%)
96.73
97.68
97.49
97.86
allowed (%)
3.27
2.32
2.33
2.14
outliers (%)
0
0
0.18
0
rotamer outliers (%)
1.58
1.29
0
0.88
clashscore
3.84
4.95
3.86
1.98
PDB code
7BDN
7B4Y
7B2K
7BFM
Highest resolution shell is shown
in parenthesis.
R-merge = Σ|(I – ⟨I⟩|ΣIi where I = intensity
of the ith reflection and ⟨I⟩ = mean intensity.
R-factor = Σ(|Fobs| – k|Fcalc|)/Σ|Fobs| and R-free is the R value for a test set of
reflections consisting of a random 5% of the diffraction data not
used in refinement.
Highest resolution shell is shown
in parenthesis.R-merge = Σ|(I – ⟨I⟩|ΣIi where I = intensity
of the ith reflection and ⟨I⟩ = mean intensity.R-factor = Σ(|Fobs| – k|Fcalc|)/Σ|Fobs| and R-free is the R value for a test set of
reflections consisting of a random 5% of the diffraction data not
used in refinement.
Small-Angle
X-ray Scattering
SAXS data were collected
on CHESS beamline id7a at 8.667 keV (1.431 Å) at 1 × 1012
photons/s. The 250 × 250 μm diameter X-ray beam is centered
on a 1.5 mm diameter capillary sample cell having 10 μm thick
quartz glass walls (Charles Supper Company, Natik, MA). Sample cell
and X-ray flight path, including beamstop, were kept in vacuo (<1
× 10–3 torr) to eliminate air scatter. The
temperature of the cell was maintained at 4 °C. Images were collected
on a Pilatus 100K-S detector (Dectris, Baden, Switzerland). The sample-to-detector
distance was calibrated using silver behenate powder (The Gem Dugout,
State College, PA). The q-space range (4π sin θ/λ
with 2θ being the scattering angle) reached from qmin = 0.009 Å–1 to qmax = 0.24 Å-1. Image integration, normalization,
and subtraction were carried out using the BioXTAS RAW program.[47] The radiation damage assessment was based on
the CORMAP criterion as implemented in RAW.[48] Sample and buffer solutions were normalized to equivalent exposure
before subtraction using transmitted intensity recorded from a beamstop
diode.Chromatographic separation of samples was conducted at
4 °C using a Superdex Increase 200 10/300 column on an AKTA Pure
system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Marlborough, MA). The flow rate
into the sample cell was 0.6 mL/min with 1 s exposures taken continuously.
Authors: Martin A Schroer; Michael Paulus; Christoph Jeworrek; Christina Krywka; Saskia Schmacke; Yong Zhai; D C Florian Wieland; Christoph J Sahle; Michael Chimenti; Catherine A Royer; Bertrand Garcia-Moreno; Metin Tolan; Roland Winter Journal: Biophys J Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Caroline J Rodgers; Christopher F Blanford; Stephen R Giddens; Pari Skamnioti; Fraser A Armstrong; Sarah J Gurr Journal: Trends Biotechnol Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 19.536
Authors: Daniel A Keedy; Lillian R Kenner; Matthew Warkentin; Rahel A Woldeyes; Jesse B Hopkins; Michael C Thompson; Aaron S Brewster; Andrew H Van Benschoten; Elizabeth L Baxter; Monarin Uervirojnangkoorn; Scott E McPhillips; Jinhu Song; Roberto Alonso-Mori; James M Holton; William I Weis; Axel T Brunger; S Michael Soltis; Henrik Lemke; Ana Gonzalez; Nicholas K Sauter; Aina E Cohen; Henry van den Bedem; Robert E Thorne; James S Fraser Journal: Elife Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Rahul Singh; Jinguang Hu; Matthew R Regner; James W Round; John Ralph; John N Saddler; Lindsay D Eltis Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 4.379