Literature DB >> 35221402

A novel proton-integrating radiography system design using a monolithic scintillator detector: experimental studies.

Chinmay D Darne1, Daniel G Robertson2, Fahed Alsanea1, Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete3, Sam Beddar1.   

Abstract

Research on proton-based imaging systems aims to improve treatment planning, internal anatomy visualization, and patient alignment for proton radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a new proton radiography system design consisting of a monolithic plastic scintillator volume and two optical cameras for use with scanning proton pencil beams. Unlike the thin scintillating plates currently used for proton radiography, the plastic scintillator volume (20 × 20 × 20 cm3) captures a wider distribution of proton beam energy depositions and avoids proton-beam modulation. The proton imaging system's characteristics were tested using image uniformity (2.6% over a 5 × 5 cm2 area), stability (0.37%), and linearity (R2 = 1) studies. We used the light distribution produced within the plastic scintillator to generate proton radiographs via two different approaches: (a) integrating light by using a camera placed along the beam axis, and (b) capturing changes to the proton Bragg peak positions with a camera placed perpendicularly to the beam axis. The latter method was used to plot and evaluate relative shifts in percentage depth light (PDL) profiles of proton beams with and without a phantom in the beam path. A curvelet minimization algorithm used differences in PDL profiles to reconstruct and refine the phantom water-equivalent thickness (WET) map. Gammex phantoms were used to compare the proton radiographs generated by these two methods. The relative accuracies in calculating WET of the phantoms using the calibration-based beam-integration (and the PDL) methods were -0.18 ± 0.35% (-0.29 ± 3.11%), -0.11 ± 0.51% (-0.15 ± 2.64%), -2.94 ± 1.20% (-0.75 ± 6.11%), and -1.65 ± 0.35% (0.36 ± 3.93%) for solid water, adipose, cortical bone, and PMMA, respectively. Further exploration of this unique multicamera-based imaging system is warranted and could lead to clinical applications that improve treatment planning and patient alignment for proton radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCD camera; plastic scintillator; proton radiography; proton therapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 35221402      PMCID: PMC8872121          DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2021.166077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A        ISSN: 0168-9002            Impact factor:   1.455


  32 in total

1.  Proof of principle study of the use of a CMOS active pixel sensor for proton radiography.

Authors:  Joao Seco; Nicolas Depauw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Experimental comparison of proton CT and dual energy x-ray CT for relative stopping power estimation in proton therapy.

Authors:  George Dedes; Jannis Dickmann; Katharina Niepel; Philipp Wesp; Robert P Johnson; Mark Pankuch; Vladimir Bashkirov; Simon Rit; Lennart Volz; Reinhard W Schulte; Guillaume Landry; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Characterization of a commercial scintillation detector for 2-D dosimetry in scanned proton and carbon ion beams.

Authors:  S Russo; A Mirandola; S Molinelli; E Mastella; A Vai; G Magro; A Mairani; D Boi; M Donetti; M Ciocca
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Development of proton CT imaging system using plastic scintillator and CCD camera.

Authors:  Sodai Tanaka; Teiji Nishio; Keiichiro Matsushita; Masato Tsuneda; Shigeto Kabuki; Mitsuru Uesaka
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Performance characterization of a 3D liquid scintillation detector for discrete spot scanning proton beam systems.

Authors:  Chinmay D Darne; Fahed Alsanea; Daniel G Robertson; Narayan Sahoo; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The evolution of proton beam therapy: Current and future status.

Authors:  Xiufang Tian; Kun Liu; Yong Hou; Jian Cheng; Jiandong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-14

7.  3D reconstruction of scintillation light emission from proton pencil beams using limited viewing angles-a simulation study.

Authors:  CheukKai Hui; Daniel Robertson; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Patient positioning verification for proton therapy using proton radiography.

Authors:  A Hammi; S Koenig; D C Weber; B Poppe; A J Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Proton radiography and proton computed tomography based on time-resolved dose measurements.

Authors:  Mauro Testa; Joost M Verburg; Mark Rose; Chul Hee Min; Shikui Tang; El Hassane Bentefour; Harald Paganetti; Hsiao-Ming Lu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Proton radiography and tomography with application to proton therapy.

Authors:  G Poludniowski; N M Allinson; P M Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.