| Literature DB >> 35216614 |
Yu Yan1, Dan Wang1, Yue Sun1, Qiong Ma1, Keke Wang1, Yueyuan Liao1, Chen Chen1, Hao Jia1, Chao Chu1, Wenling Zheng1, Jiawen Hu2, Yue Yuan3, Yang Wang1, Yuliang Wu4, Jianjun Mu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The triglyceride-glucose index (TyG index) has emerged as a reliable surrogate marker of insulin resistance associated with arterial stiffness. However, most studies were based on a cross-sectional design, and few studies have evaluated the longitudinal impact of the TyG index on arterial stiffness. This study aimed to investigate the associations of single time point measurement and the long-term trajectory of the TyG index with arterial stiffness in a Chinese cohort.Entities:
Keywords: Arterial stiffness; Cohort study; Insulin resistance; Triglyceride-glucose index
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35216614 PMCID: PMC8876112 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-022-01453-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Fig. 1Flowchart for inclusion/exclusion of study participants
Characteristics of participants according to quartiles of TyG index in 2017 (n = 2480)
| Characteristics | Quartiles of TyG index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (5.71–8.14) | Q2 (8.14–8.49) | Q3 (8.49–8.90) | Q4 (8.90–12.31) | ||
| N | 620 | 620 | 620 | 620 | |
| Age, yearsa | 42.8 (39.7, 44.9) | 42.8 (39.4, 44.9) | 43.1 (39.9, 45) | 42.6 (40, 44.8) | 0.988 |
| Male, n (%)b | 236 (38.1%) | 299 (48.2%) | 370 (59.7%) | 446 (71.9%) | < 0.001 |
| Regular exercise, n (%)b | 363 (58.5%) | 373 (60.2%) | 365 (58.9%) | 363 (58.5%) | 0.866 |
| Smoking, n (%)b | 179 (28.9%) | 232 (37.4%) | 284 (45.8%) | 346 (55.8%) | < 0.001 |
| Drinking, n (%)b | 117 (18.9%) | 155 (25.0%) | 209 (33.7%) | 231 (37.3%) | < 0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2a | 22.1 (20.6, 23.9) | 23.1 (21.5, 24.9) | 24.6 (22.5, 26.6) | 25.5 (23.6, 27.8) | < 0.001 |
| Waist hip ratioa | 0.9 (0.8, 0.9) | 0.9 (0.9, 0.9) | 0.9 (0.9, 1) | 1.0 (0.9, 1) | < 0.001 |
| Heart rate, bpma | 72 (65, 78) | 72 (67, 79) | 73 (67, 80) | 75 (68, 82) | < 0.001 |
| SBP, mmHga | 116.3 (108.7, 126.0) | 118.3 (110, 128) | 123.5 (114.6, 132.7) | 126.3 (117.3, 137) | < 0.001 |
| DBP, mmHga | 72 (66.7, 79) | 74 (67, 81.3) | 77.5 (70.3, 85) | 80.7 (74, 88.3) | < 0.001 |
| FBG, mmol/La | 4.4 (4.1, 4.7) | 4.5 (4.2, 4.8) | 4.6 (4.3, 4.9) | 4.8 (4.5, 5.4) | < 0.001 |
| TC, mmol/La | 4.2 (3.8, 4.7) | 4.4 (4, 4.9) | 4.6 (4.2, 5) | 4.8 (4.4, 5.3) | < 0.001 |
| TG, mmol/La | 0.8 (0.7, 0.9) | 1.1 (1, 1.3) | 1.6 (1.4, 1.8) | 2.5 (2.2, 3.3) | < 0.001 |
| LDL-C, mmol/La | 2.3 (2, 2.6) | 2.5 (2.2, 2.9) | 2.6 (2.3, 3) | 2.6 (2.1, 3) | < 0.001 |
| HDL-C, mmol/La | 1.3 (1.2, 1.5) | 1.2 (1.1, 1.4) | 1.1 (1, 1.2) | 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) | < 0.001 |
| Serum uric acid, μmol/La | 238.6 (200.5, 287.6) | 264.5 (215.6, 312.4) | 293.9 (244.6, 346.2) | 323.1 (268.3, 374.8) | < 0.001 |
| Serum creatinine, μmol/La | 71.3 (63.2, 81) | 74.3 (65.5, 85) | 77.4 (68.2, 86.8) | 80.6 (71.6, 89.5) | < 0.001 |
| TyG indexa | 7.9 (7.8, 8) | 8.3 (8.2, 8.4) | 8.7 (8.6, 8.8) | 9.2 (9.1, 9.5) | < 0.001 |
| hs-CRP, μmol/La | 0.2 (0.2, 0.6) | 0.2 (0.2, 0.6) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.8) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.8) | < 0.001 |
| baPWV, cm/sa | 1160 (1047.3, 1294) | 1174 (1071.5, 1301) | 1241 (1109.8, 1404.3) | 1299.8 (1169.5, 1468) | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension, n (%)b | 52 (8.4%) | 68 (11.0%) | 111 (17.9%) | 163 (26.3%) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes, n (%)b | 0 | 2 (0.3%) | 4 (0.6%) | 59 (9.5%) | < 0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%)b | 58 (9.4%) | 139 (22.4%) | 228 (36.8%) | 527 (85.0%) | < 0.001 |
BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FBG fasting blood glucose, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TyG index triglyceride–glucose index, hs-CRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, baPWV brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity
aData are given as median (interquartile range), and P values for trend were calculated by the Jonckheere-Terpstra test
bData are expressed as number (percentage), and P values for trend were calculated using Cochran–Armitage trend test
Fig. 2Comparison of the baPWV levels among the TyG index quartiles (a) and the associations of the TyG index with baPWV (b). a Differences in baPWV values across quartiles were tested using Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc test. *P < 0.05 versus the first quartile; #P < 0.05 versus the second quartile; &P < 0.05 versus the third quartile. b Data were fitted with a linear regression model using restricted cubic splines with 3 knots at 10, 50, and 90th percentiles of TyG index. The model was adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking, regular exercise, SBP, BMI, hs-CRP, and diabetes. The solid line represented the estimations, and the shaded area represented 95% confidence interval
Association of TyG index with baPWV in 2017 (n = 2480)
| TyG index | Unadjusted | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) | P value | β (95% CI) | P value | β (95% CI) | P value | |
| Per 1 unit increase | 105.4 (90.0, 120.8) | < 0.001 | 82.8 (67.6, 97.9) | < 0.001 | 37.1 (23.7, 50.6) | < 0.001 |
| Q1 (5.71–8.14) | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||
| Q2 (8.14–8.49) | 21.8 (− 1.4, 45.0) | 0.065 | 13.8 (− 8.4, 36.0) | 0.224 | 14.2 (-4.0, 32.3) | 0.126 |
| Q3 (8.49–8.90) | 92.3 (66.9, 117.8) | < 0.001 | 68.1 (43.1, 93.1) | < 0.001 | 38.4 (17.2, 59.7) | < 0.001 |
| Q4 (8.90–12.31) | 159.9 (133.4, 186.5) | < 0.001 | 131.1 (104.0, 158.2) | < 0.001 | 67.3 (42.8, 91.8) | < 0.001 |
Model 1, adjusted for sex and age
Model 2, further adjusted for smoking, alcohol drinking, regular exercise, BMI, SBP, hs-CRP, and diabetes in 2017
Fig. 3TyG index trajectory over a 12-year follow-up
Baseline characteristics of participants in 2005 according to TyG index trajectory (n = 180)
| Characteristics | Trajectory of TyG index | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-stable | Moderate | High-increasing | ||
| N | 63 | 46 | 71 | |
| Age, yearsa | 28.8 (27, 32.6) | 29.4 (27.4, 32.5) | 28.2 (26.5, 30.6) | 0.067 |
| Male, n (%)b | 28 (44.4%) | 24 (51.1%) | 56 (80.0%) | < 0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2a | 21.6 (19.9, 24.4) | 21.9 (20.1, 23.5) | 23.9 (21.6, 25.9) | < 0.001 |
| Waist hip ratioa | 0.8 (0.8, 0.9) | 0.8 (0.8, 0.9) | 0.9 (0.8, 0.9) | < 0.001 |
| Heart rate, bpma | 70 (66, 76) | 74 (68, 79) | 76 (68, 80) | 0.014 |
| SBP, mmHgc | 119.1 ± 13.6 | 121.2 ± 13.7 | 126.3 ± 14.7 | 0.004 |
| DBP, mmHgc | 76.5 ± 10.5 | 76.1 ± 10.3 | 82.4 ± 9.8 | 0.001 |
| FBG, mmol/La | 4.6 (4.3, 5.0) | 4.6 (4.3, 5.2) | 4.9 (4.4, 5.5) | 0.007 |
| TC, mmol/Lc | 4.2 ± 0.7 | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 4.6 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 |
| TG, mmol/La | 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) | 1.3 (1.1, 1.4) | 1.8 (1.3, 2.2) | < 0.001 |
| LDL-C, mmol/La | 2.5 (2.2, 2.8) | 2.6 (2.3, 2.8) | 2.6 (2.5, 3.1) | 0.005 |
| HDL-C, mmol/La | 1.1 (0.9, 1.2) | 1.1 (1, 1.2) | 1.1 (1, 1.3) | 0.065 |
| TyG indexc | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 8.5 ± 0.2 | 8.8 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 |
| hs-CRP, μmol/La | 0.3 (0.2, 0.6) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.7) | 0.4 (0.2, 1.7) | 0.121 |
| Hypertension, n (%)b | 9 (14.3%) | 7 (14.9%) | 15 (21.4%) | 0.270 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%)b | 30 (47.6%) | 17 (37.0%) | 32 (45.1%) | 0.793 |
aData are given as median (interquartile range), and P values for trend were calculated by the Jonckheere-Terpstra test
bData are expressed as number (percentage), and P values for trend were calculated using Cochran–Armitage trend test
cData are shown as mean ± standard deviation, and P values for trend were calculated by one-way analysis of variance for linear trend
Association of TyG index trajectories with high-risk baPWV in 12-year follow-ups
| TyG index trajectories | High-risk baPWV (%) | Unadjusted | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| Low-stable | 7 (11.1%) | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Moderate | 11 (23.4%) | 2.44 (0.87, 6.89) | 0.091 | 2.39 (0.85, 6.77) | 0.100 | 2.51 (0.85, 7.39) | 0.095 |
| High-increasing | 21 (30.0%) | 3.43 (1.34, 8.75) | 0.01 | 3.32 (1.24, 8.90) | 0.017 | 2.76 (1.40, 7.54) | 0.037 |
Model 1, logistic regression adjusted for sex and age
Model 2, further adjusted for regular exercise and hypertension