| Literature DB >> 33816569 |
Wen Guo1, Wenfang Zhu1, Juan Wu1, Xiaona Li1, Jing Lu1, Pei Qin1, Cheng Zhu1, Nianzhen Xu1, Qun Zhang1.
Abstract
Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this study, the association of the triglyceride glucose (TyG) index, a simple surrogate marker of IR, with arterial stiffness and 10-year CVD risk was evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Framingham risk score; arterial stiffness; brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; insulin resistance; triglyceride glucose index
Year: 2021 PMID: 33816569 PMCID: PMC8017152 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.585776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Clinical characteristics of the study population according to TyG index.
| (6.82–8.34) | (8.35–8.70) | (8.71–9.13) | (9.14–12.23) | ||
| N | 3,473 | 3,380 | 3,458 | 3,395 | |
| Age (years) | 47.12 ± 10.45 | 49.86 ± 9.71 | 50.46 ± 9.80 | 50.24 ± 9.37 | <0.01 |
| Sex (male/Female) | 1,223/2,250 | 1,733/1,647 | 2,140/1,318 | 2,537/858 | <0.01 |
| Smoking (%) | 343 (9.9) | 509 (15.1) | 764 (22.1) | 980 (28.9) | <0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.76 ± 2.81 | 24.17 ± 2.90 | 25.14 ± 2.91 | 26.32 ± 3.11 | <0.01 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 120.27 ± 16.49 | 125.69 ± 16.85 | 128.54 ± 16.94 | 132.38 ± 16.76 | <0.01 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 72.65 ± 10.73 | 76.72 ± 10.76 | 78.90 ± 10.93 | 82.30 ± 10.92 | <0.01 |
| PP (mmHg) | 47.62 ± 10.84 | 48.97 ± 11.51 | 49.64 ± 11.56 | 50.10 ± 11.75 | <0.01 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.01 ± 0.45 | 5.27 ± 0.59 | 5.49 ± 0.78 | 6.33 ± 2.03 | <0.01 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.38 ± 0.37 | 5.51 ± 0.43 | 5.62 ± 0.56 | 6.03 ± 1.15 | <0.01 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.01 ± 0.93 | 5.28 ± 0.98 | 5.50 ± 1.03 | 5.73 ± 1.16 | <0.01 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.81 ± 0.16 | 1.22 ± 0.17 | 1.72 ± 0.28 | 3.37 ± 1.91 | <0.01 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.00 ± 0.68 | 3.29 ± 0.72 | 3.49 ± 0.75 | 3.57 ± 0.81 | <0.01 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.54 ± 0.32 | 1.40 ± 0.28 | 1.28 ± 0.25 | 1.17 ± 0.23 | <0.01 |
| TyG index | 8.06 ± 0.21 | 8.53 ± 0.10 | 8.90 ± 0.12 | 9.60 ± 0.43 | <0.01 |
| Uric acid (μmol/L) | 290.32 ± 73.99 | 320.48 ± 78.82 | 345.64 ± 81.62 | 379.96 ± 86.85 | <0.01 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 63.15 ± 13.24 | 67.16 ± 14.44 | 69.39 ± 14.28 | 71.15 ± 14.95 | <0.01 |
| Hypertension, | 299 (8.61) | 521 (15.41) | 718 (20.76) | 982 (28.92) | <0.01 |
| Anti-hypertensive drugs, | 284 (8.17) | 509 (15.06) | 699 (20.21) | 954 (28.10) | <0.01 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; PP, Pulse pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triacylglyceride; LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 1Age adjusted BaPWV compared across the TyG index quartiles for all participants, men, and women.
Figure 2Percentages of 10-CVD risk categorize compared across the quartiles of the TyG index.
Correlation between ba-PWV, Framingham risk score, and clinical variables.
| Age (years) | 0.542 | <0.001 | 0.435 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.175 | <0.001 | 0.281 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 0.622 | <0.001 | 0.352 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 0.486 | <0.001 | 0.332 | <0.001 |
| PP (mmHg) | 0.458 | <0.001 | 0.203 | <0.001 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 0.260 | <0.001 | 0.231 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 0.269 | <0.001 | 0.238 | <0.001 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 0.104 | <0.001 | 0.175 | <0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.163 | <0.001 | 0.287 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.110 | <0.001 | 0.207 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | −0.112 | <0.001 | −0.302 | <0.001 |
| TyG index | 0.283 | <0.001 | 0.362 | <0.001 |
| Uric acid (μmol/L) | 0.166 | <0.001 | 0.331 | <0.001 |
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; PP, Pulse pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triacylglyceride; LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Logistic regression analysis of the association between high baPWV and the TyG index.
| 1 | 2.137(2.006–2.276) | <0.001 | 1.561(1.438–1.694) | <0.001 | 3.747(3.340–4.204) | <0.001 |
| 2 | 1.514(1.371–1.672) | <0.001 | 1.531(1.348–1.739) | <0.001 | 1.848(1.586–2.189) | <0.001 |
Model1: unadjusted.
Model2: adjustment for age, smoking, BMI, pulse pressure, HbA1c, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, uric acid, and antihypertensive medication status.
Logistic regression analysis of the association between the 10-year CVD risk and TyG index.
| 1 | 2.803 (2.623–2.996) | <0.001 | 1.875 (1.737–2.025) | <0.001 | 3.954 (3.078–5.078) | <0.001 |
| 2 | 1.420 (1.147–1.756) | <0.001 | 1.323 (1.056–1.657) | 0.015 | 2.345 (1.179–4.667) | 0.015 |
Model1: unadjusted.
Model2: adjustment for BMI, pulse pressure, HbA1c, LDL-C, and uric acid.
Figure 3The area under the ROC (AUROC) of the TyG index for predicting high baPWV in women.
Figure 4The area under the ROC (AUROC) of the TyG index for predicting high baPWV in men.
Figure 5The areas under the ROC (AUROCs) of the TyG index, baPWV, and TyG-baPWV for predicting 10-CVD risk in women.