| Literature DB >> 35216181 |
Davide Mancino1,2,3, Naji Kharouf1,2, Francesco Scavello1, Sophie Hellé1, Fouad Salloum-Yared4, Angela Mutschler1, Eric Mathieu1, Philippe Lavalle1, Marie-Hélène Metz-Boutigue1, Youssef Haïkel1,2,3.
Abstract
Resistance to antifungal therapy of Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida strains, frequently associated with oral candidosis, is on the rise. In this context, host-defense peptides have emerged as new promising candidates to overcome antifungal resistance. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness against Candida species of different Catestatin-derived peptides, as well as the combined effect with serum albumin. Among Catestatin-derived peptides, the most active against sensitive and resistant strains of C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata was the D-isomer of Cateslytin (D-bCtl) whereas the efficiency of the L-isomer (L-bCtl) significantly decreases against C. glabrata strains. Images obtained by transmission electron microscopy clearly demonstrated fungal membrane lysis and the leakage of the intracellular material induced by the L-bCtl and D-bCtl peptides. The possible synergistic effect of albumin on Catestatin-derived peptides activity was investigated too. Our finding showed that bovine serum albumin (BSA) when combined with the L- isomer of Catestatin (L-bCts) had a synergistic effect against Candida albicans especially at low concentrations of BSA; however, no synergistic effect was detected when BSA interacted with L-bCtl, suggesting the importance of the C-terminal end of L-bCts (GPGLQL) for the interaction with BSA. In this context in vitro D-bCtl, as well as the combination of BSA with L-bCts are potential candidates for the development of new antifungal drugs for the treatment of oral candidosis due to Candida and non-Candida albicans, without detrimental side effects.Entities:
Keywords: Catestatin; antifungal; antimicrobial peptides; candidosis; resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35216181 PMCID: PMC8876135 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Susceptibility of Candida strains tested. EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) breakpoints were used for Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole, and CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) breakpoints for Caspofungin. “S”, “R”, and “I” correspond to susceptible standard dosing regimen, resistant, therapeutic failure with increased exposure and susceptible increased exposure, respectively.
| Strain | Amphotericin B | Fluconazole | Voriconazole | Caspofungin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC (µg/mL) | MIC (µg/mL) | MIC (µg/mL) | MIC (µg/mL) | |
| 0.19 | 0.125 | 0.002 | 0.094 | |
| 0.125 | >256 | >32 | 0.047 | |
| 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.047 | 0.125 | |
| 0.125 | 96 | 1.5 | 0.125 | |
| 0.125 | 3 | 0.032 | 0.25 | |
| 0.5 | >256 | 8 | 0.25 | |
| 0.75 | 0.38 | 0.012 | 0.125 |
Antimicrobial activity against C. albicans of different bovine and human Cts-derived peptides. (a) Sequences and MIC (µg/mL) of the different peptides derived from bCts and bCtl against sensitive “S” and resistant “R” C. albicans; (b) sequences and MIC of the different peptides derived from hCts and hCtl against sensitive “S” and resistant “R” C. albicans. L, levogyre and D, dextrogyre isomers. * Values obtained from Dartevelle et al. [28].
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |||
|
| bCgA344–364 | R S M | 30 | 50 |
|
| R S M R L S F R A R G Y G F R | 7.9 * | 9.6 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| R S M R L S F R | 50 | 100 | |
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| R L S F R A- | >100 | >100 | |
|
| R L S F R A- | >100 | >100 | |
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| L S F R | >100 | >100 | |
|
| L S F R | >100 | >100 | |
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |||
|
| hCgA352–372 | S S M K L S F R A R A Y G F R G P G P Q L | >240 | >240 |
|
| S S M K L S F R A R A Y G F R | 50 | 50 | |
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| S S M K L S F R | >100 | >100 | |
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
|
| M K L S F R | >100 | >100 | |
|
| >100 | >100 | ||
Antifungal activity of L-bCts, L-hCts, L-bCtl, and D-bCtl against various strains of Candida. The percentage of growth inhibition of the indicated yeasts in the presence of different concentrations of L-bCts, L-hCts, L-bCtl, and D-bCtl was determined by broth microdilution assays. Each MIC, defined as the lowest concentration of a drug able to inhibit 100% of fungal growth, was determined using a modified Gompertz model. Experiments were performed in triplicate. “S”: sensitive, “R”: resistant. * Values obtained from Dartevelle et al. [28].
| Candida Strain. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 30 | 50 | 50 | 20 | >100 | >100 |
|
| >240 | >240 | >240 | >240 | >240 | >240 |
|
| 7.9 * | 9.6 | 9.8 | 2.0 | 38.2 | 61.4 |
|
| 5.5 * | 9.6 | 8.1 | 2.0 | 13.4 | 15.0 |
Figure 1Transmission electron microscopy images of cells from “S” C. albicans, treated with D-bCtl or L-bCtl at different concentrations, compared to untreated cells. D-bCtl or L-bCtl were used at concentrations of 1 × MIC and 10 × MIC and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with minimal shaking. White stars indicate which cell is magnified at 10,000×. Black arrows localize lysed cells.
Figure 2Transmission electron microscopy images of cells from a resistant strain of Candida albicans, treated with D-Ctl or L-Ctl at different concentrations, compared to untreated cells. D-Ctl or L-Ctl were used at concentrations of 1 × MIC and 10 × MIC and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with minimal shaking. White stars indicate which cell is magnified at 10,000×. Black arrows localize lysed cells.
Figure 3Antimicrobial activity of L-bCtl and L-bCts with BSA against C. albicans. BSA was used with a molar concentration of 30, 6, and 1.5 nM for Ctl (1 µM) or 120, 24 and 6 nM for L-bCts (4 µM). The growth inhibition of BSA (controls) is reported only for the concentrations used with L-bCts where we obtained synergistic antimicrobial effects. No antimicrobial effects were obtained for BSA combined with L-bCtl., *** p ≤ 0.001 with 1 way ANOVA comparing peptide only to BSA plus peptide treatments.
Figure 4Non-toxicity of BSA/L-bCts complex. Hemolytic assays of erythrocytes with BSA (120, 24, and 6 nM) plus L-bCts (40 and 80 µM). All the treatments were statistically significant compared to the positive control of the hemolytic test with One way ANOVA.
Figure 5Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) analysis of the interaction BSA with L-bCts or L-bCtl. The analysis was performed at 37 °C in PBS pH 7.2 with a first injection of 2 mg/mL BSA (400 µL,) and a second injection of 1 mg/mL L-bCts or L-bCtl (400 µL).