| Literature DB >> 26659616 |
Mihaela Mateescu1,2, Sébastien Baixe1,2, Tony Garnier3, Loic Jierry3, Vincent Ball1,2, Youssef Haikel1,2, Marie Hélène Metz-Boutigue1,2, Michel Nardin4, Pierre Schaaf1,2,3, Olivier Etienne1,2, Philippe Lavalle1,2.
Abstract
Implanted medical devices are prone to infection. Designing new strategies to reduce infection and implant rejection are an important challenge for modern medicine. To this end, in the last few years many hydrogels have been designed as matrices for antimicrobial molecules destined to fight frequent infection found in moist environments like the oral cavity. In this study, two types of original hydrogels containing the antimicrobial peptide Cateslytin have been designed. The first hydrogel is based on alginate modified with catechol moieties (AC gel). The choice of these catechol functional groups which derive from mussel's catechol originates from their strong adhesion properties on various surfaces. The second type of gel we tested is a mixture of alginate catechol and thiol-terminated Pluronic (AC/PlubisSH), a polymer derived from Pluronic, a well-known biocompatible polymer. This PlubisSH polymer has been chosen for its capacity to enhance the cohesion of the composition. These two gels offer new clinical uses, as they can be injected and jellify in a few minutes. Moreover, we show these gels strongly adhere to implant surfaces and gingiva. Once gelled, they demonstrate a high level of rheological properties and stability. In particular, the dissipative energy of the (AC/PlubisSH) gel detachment reaches a high value on gingiva (10 J.m-2) and on titanium alloys (4 J.m-2), conferring a strong mechanical barrier. Moreover, the Cateslytin peptide in hydrogels exhibited potent antimicrobial activities against P. gingivalis, where a strong inhibition of bacterial metabolic activity and viability was observed, indicating reduced virulence. Gel biocompatibility tests indicate no signs of toxicity. In conclusion, these new hydrogels could be ideal candidates in the prevention and/or management of periimplant diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26659616 PMCID: PMC4682826 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Gelation kinetics of the AC and AC/PlubisSH gels.
Rheological properties of AC (A) and AC/PlubisSH (B) hydrogels recorded at a frequency of 1 Hz at a temperature of 37°C (elastic modulus, G’ and viscous modulus, G”).
Fig 2In vitro quantitative adhesion of hydrogels on titanium (Ti) and gingiva.
Dissipative energy during detachment of AC and AC/PlubisSH hydrogels from gingiva is measured after 30 min of contact with the substrates (Ti/Ti or Ti/gingiva) at 37°C.
Fig 3Monitoring of CTL released from the gels.
Fluorescence spectrophotometry was used to monitor CTL-Rhodamine released out of AC and AC/PlusbisSH gels over time (MH medium, 37°C).
Fig 4Antibacterial activity of gels.
Metabolic activity of bacterial supernatant after 24h (A). « Plastic » corresponds to a negative control, i.e. bacteria in medium on the 96-well plate, without any gel. « Medium » corresponds to culture media in the 96-well plate without any bacteria or gel. « Antibiotic » corresponds to the positive control with bacteria in medium with two standard antibiotics (tetracyclin and cefotoxim) as supplements. The asterisk (*) denotes a statistical difference between the metabolic activity of P. gingivalis found in the supernatants of AC and AC-CTL gels, (#) indicates a statistical difference between the metabolic activity of P. gingivalis found in the supernatant of AC/PlubisSH and AC/PlubisSH-CTL (p < 0.05). Inhibition of colonies forming units (CFU) of the supernatants after 24h of seeding (B and C). These supernatants were previously removed from the gels respectively after 5h (B) and 24h (C) of seeding. The control used in these figures (corresponding to 100% CFU) corresponds to colonies on agar plates obtained from supernatant of AC gel without CTL (Tissue Culture Polystyrene was not used as control because it leads to an homogenous growth of bacteria without colonies). Error bars represent means ± SD.
Fig 5Evaluation of cellular biocompatibility of the gels.
(A-F) The LIVE-DEAD observations of cells after 3 days of contact with the 24h gel extract solutions of gels, respectively with AC, AC-CTL, AC/PlubisSH-CTL, ACPlubisSH compared with positive and negative controls. Top pictures in green represent living cells. Images in the bottom row in red represent dead cells.