| Literature DB >> 35215680 |
Yunhui Bao1, Jian He1,2, Ke Song1,2, Jie Guo1,2, Xianwu Zhou1,2, Shima Liu1,2.
Abstract
Pathogens, especially drug-resistant pathogens caused by the abuse of antibiotics, have become a major threat to human health and public health safety. The exploitation and application of new antibacterial agents is extremely urgent. As a natural biopolymer, cellulose has recently attracted much attention due to its excellent hydrophilicity, economy, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. In particular, the preparation of cellulose-based hydrogels with excellent structure and properties from cellulose and its derivatives has received increasing attention thanks to the existence of abundant hydrophilic functional groups (such as hydroxyl, carboxy, and aldehyde groups) within cellulose and its derivatives. The cellulose-based hydrogels have broad application prospects in antibacterial-related biomedical fields. The latest advances of preparation and antibacterial application of cellulose-based hydrogels has been reviewed, with a focus on the antibacterial applications of composite hydrogels formed from cellulose and metal nanoparticles; metal oxide nanoparticles; antibiotics; polymers; and plant extracts. In addition, the antibacterial mechanism and antibacterial characteristics of different cellulose-based antibacterial hydrogels were also summarized. Furthermore, the prospects and challenges of cellulose-based antibacterial hydrogels in biomedical applications were also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial; biomedical; cellulose; hydrogels; nanotechnology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215680 PMCID: PMC8879376 DOI: 10.3390/polym14040769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Representative cellulose derivatives for synthesis of cellulose-based hydrogels (a) and advantages of cellulose-based hydrogels in practical applications (b).
Advantages and disadvantages of different cellulose derivatives for the preparation of cellulose-based hydrogels.
| Cellulose Derivatives | Advantages | Disadvantages | Typical Applications | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methyl cellulose | Water retention, good stability and biosafety | Easy to precipitate in salt solution | Biocomposite film | [ |
| Carboxymethyl cellulose | Excellent tackifying effect, biocompatible and biodegradable | Sensitive to the pH, temperature and ionic strength of solution | Hydrogel beads | [ |
| Hydroxyethyl cellulose | Biocompatible, excellent tackifying effect and highly water retention | Prone to degradation and instability | Wound dressing | [ |
| Hydroxypropyl cellulose | Stability, non-biotoxicity and water-soluble | Potential hypersensitivity | Thermoresponsive hydrogel | [ |
| Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose | Excellent film-forming and dispersion, water retention | Potential skin irritation | Scaffolds materials | [ |
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the preparation of CuNPs-cellulose hydrogel (reprinted from reference [78] with permission from Elsevier).
Representative examples of cellulose-based hydrogels loaded with AgNPs.
| Cellulose-Based Hydrogels | Bacterial | Applications | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| AgNPs-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel |
| Biomaterial | [ |
| AgNPs-gelatin-cellulose hydrogel |
| Wound healing in nursing care of infants | [ |
| AgNPs-alginate-nanocrystalline cellulose hydrogel |
| Active materials for clinical applications | [ |
| AgNPs-cellulose carbamate hydrogel |
| Wound dressing | [ |
|
| |||
| AgNPs-bacterial cellulose nanocomposite hydrogel |
| Wound dressing | [ |
| AgNPs-polyvinyl alcohol-bacterial cellulose hydrogel |
| Wound treatment | [ |
| AgNPs-polyacrylamide-hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogel |
| Antibacterial strain sensor | [ |
| AgNPs-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel |
| Antibacterial material | [ |
| AgNPs-phthalated cashew gum-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel |
| Wound treatment | [ |
| AgNPs-polyacrylic acid-cellulose hydrogel |
| Antibacterial material | [ |
| AgNPs-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel |
| Antibacterial material | [ |
Figure 3Antibacterial schematic diagram of cellulose-based hydrogels loaded with different antibacterial agents.
The advantages and disadvantages of different antibacterial agents used to modify cellulose-based hydrogels.
| Antibacterial Agents | Advantages | Disadvantages | Typical Applications | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal or oxidized metal nanoparticles | Broad-spectrum and long-term antibacterial, low bacterial resistance | Tend to agglomerate, certain cytotoxicity and environmental toxicity | Wound dressing | [ |
| Antibiotics | Specific and efficient antibacterial, ideal biocompatibility | Bacterial resistance and short-term antibacterial activity, prone to degradation and instability | Clinical antibacterial | [ |
| Polymers | Biodegradable and nontoxic, high modifiability and biocompatibility | Poor permeability | Antibacterial food packaging | [ |
| Plant extracts | Rich resources, environmentally friendly, anti-drug resistant bacteria | Difficult to extract and enrich | Biomedicine | [ |
Figure 4Scheme for synthesis of tannic acid-polyvinyl alcohol-cellulose composite hydrogel (a) and the chemical bond diagram in the hydrogel (b) (reprinted from reference [170] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 5The scheme for synthesis carboxyl cellulose composite hydrogels containing silver, copper and iron ions was prepared by electrochemical method (reprinted from reference [176] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 6The antibacterial mechanism diagram of cellulose composite hydrogel loaded with ZnONPs.
Figure 7Challenges and solutions in antibacterial applications of cellulose-based hydrogels.