| Literature DB >> 35621568 |
Jinyu Yang1,2, Dongliang Liu1, Xiaofang Song1,2, Yuan Zhao1,2, Yayang Wang1,2, Lu Rao1, Lili Fu1, Zhijun Wang1, Xiaojie Yang1, Yuesheng Li1, Yi Liu2,3.
Abstract
With the development of science and technology, photocatalytic technology is of great interest. Nanosized photocatalysts are easy to agglomerate in an aqueous solution, which is unfavorable for recycling. Therefore, hydrogel-based photocatalytic composites were born. Compared with other photocatalytic carriers, hydrogels have a three-dimensional network structure, high water absorption, and a controllable shape. Meanwhile, the high permeability of these composites is an effective way to promote photocatalysis technology by inhibiting nanoparticle photo corrosion, while significantly ensuring the catalytic activity of the photocatalysts. With the growing energy crisis and limited reserves of traditional energy sources such as oil, the attention of researchers was drawn to natural polymers. Like almost all abundant natural polymer compounds in the world, cellulose has the advantages of non-toxicity, degradability, and biocompatibility. It is used as a class of reproducible crude material for the preparation of hydrogel photocatalytic composites. The network structure and high hydroxyl active sites of cellulose-based hydrogels improve the adsorption performance of catalysts and avoid nanoparticle collisions, indirectly enhancing their photocatalytic performance. In this paper, we sum up the current research progress of cellulose-based hydrogels. After briefly discussing the properties and preparation methods of cellulose and its descendant hydrogels, we explore the effects of hydrogels on photocatalytic properties. Next, the cellulose-based hydrogel photocatalytic composites are classified according to the type of catalyst, and the research progress in different fields is reviewed. Finally, the challenges they will face are summarized, and the development trends are prospected.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose; cellulose derivatives; hydrogels; photocatalytic composites
Year: 2022 PMID: 35621568 PMCID: PMC9141161 DOI: 10.3390/gels8050270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
Figure 1Molecular structure of cellulose and its origin in nature.
Figure 2(a) Synthesis mechanism of cellulose nanotitanium dioxide aerogel (CNFT); (b) TEM micrograph of CNFT2; (c) UV-Vis spectra of P25 and CNFT2 [44].
Classification of cellulose-based hydrogel photocatalytic composites.
| Categories | Photocatalysts | Hydrogel | Characteristics | Preparation Methods | Specific Surface Area/m2g−1 | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Oxide Semiconductor Composites | ZnO | PAM/CMC/DDM | Suspended hydrogels, adsorb heavy metal ions, and degrade dyes efficiently | Mechanical foaming and in situ polymerization | - | Zhao et al. 2021 |
| Cellulose | Dispersion framework for nanomaterials | Physical crosslinking | - | Jiao et al. 2018 | ||
| Bamboo fiber | High specific surface area | Chemical crosslinking | 39.18 | Qin et al. 2017 | ||
| Cu2O | Cellulose/AA/AM | High adsorption | Chemical crosslinking | 89.56 | Su et al. 2017 | |
| TiO2 | CMCNa/HEC | Superabsorbent, biodegradable, and photocatalytic degradation crosslinker | Chemical crosslinking | - | Marcı et al. 2006 | |
| Cotton cellulose | High temperature resistant | Physical crosslinking | 6.10 | Melone et al. 2013 | ||
| α-Cellulose | TiO2 in situ generators, excellent strength and good toughness | Chemical crosslinking | 550 | Wang et al. 2017 | ||
| TOCNs/PAM | Super-tough | Chemical crosslinking | - | Yue et al. 2020 | ||
| BC | Self-cleaning, antibacterial, and UV shielding | Chemical crosslinking | - | Rahman et al. 2021 | ||
| CNFs | Good adsorption, photocatalytic degradation ability, low density, and easy recovery | Chemical crosslinking | 330 | Li et al. 2021 | ||
| Na2Ti3O7 | Sisal cellulose | High specific surface area | Physical crosslinking | 248.93 | Liu et al. 2021 | |
| Metal sulfide (chloride) semiconductor composites | MoS2 | BC | Bifunctional | Chemical crosslinking | 137 | Ferreira-Neto et al. 2022 |
| CdS | Straw cellulose | Green recyclable | Chemical crosslinking | - | Qian et al. 2020 | |
| CdxZn1-xS | CMC | High yield of hydrogen, good stability, easy recovery | Chemical crosslinking | - | Wu et al. 2018 | |
| Ag/AgCl | CMC | Hydrogel beads, photocatalytic degradation of RhB | Chemical crosslinking | - | Heidarpour et al. 2020 | |
| Organic semiconductor composites | g-C3N4 | Polyester fiber/cotton wool | High specific surface area, impact resistant | Chemical crosslinking | - | Chen et al. 2019 |
| Cotton linter | Enhanced carrier separation | - | - | Bai et al. 2019; Yao et al. 2019 | ||
| CMC/β-Cyclodextrin | ||||||
| GO | MCC | Adsorption–photocatalytic synergy | Chemical crosslinking | 48.6 | Liu et al. 2021 | |
| MIL-100(Fe) | CMC/β-Cyclodextrin | Good water retainability | Chemical crosslinking | - | Zhang et al. 2021 |
Photocatalytic rate constants of Ag/AgCl@Al-CMC and Ag/AgCl@Fe-CMC under different conditions ((copied from Reference [74]).
| Ag/AgCl@Ag-CMC | AgCl@Fe-CMC | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalyst Dosage | 1 (g/L) | 2 (g/L) | 4 (g/L) | 6 (g/L) | 1 (g/L) | 2 (g/L) | 4 (g/L) | 6 (g/L) |
|
| 0.0101 | 0.0223 | 0.0517 | 0.0711 | 0.0073 | 0.0152 | 0.0304 | 0.0395 |
|
| 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
|
| 10 (ppm) | 15 (ppm) | 20 (ppm) | 25 (ppm) | 10 (ppm) | 15 (ppm) | 20 (ppm) | 25 (ppm) |
|
| 0.0517 | 0.0318 | 0.0233 | 0.0141 | 0.0304 | 0.0224 | 0.0170 | 0.0103 |
|
| 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 |
|
| 4 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 9 | ||
|
| 0.0295 | 0.0517 | 0.0673 | 0.0198 | 0.0304 | 0.0352 | ||
|
| 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.95 | ||
Degradation efficiency of MO by different photocatalytic materials.
| Dye | Catalysts | Dye Concentration (mg/L) | Time (min) | Degradation (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO | TiO2-TOCNs-PAM | 10 | 90 | 97.3 | Yue et al. 2020 |
| CA/ZnO | 20 | 120 | 94.78 | Hasanpour et al. 2021 | |
| g-C3N4 Cellulose aerogel | 20 | 180 | 99 | Ma et al. 2021 | |
| Ag@AgCl-contained cellulose hydrogel | 10 | 70 | 93 | Tang et al. 2018 | |
| Cu2O/TiO2/CNF/rGH | 20 | 120 | 85.62 | Zheng et al. 2022 | |
| Cu@Cu2O/RGO/cellulose hybrid aerogel | 10 | 120 | 92.8 | Du et al. 2019 |
Figure 3(a) Synthesis process of Cu@Cu2O/RGO/CE hybrid catalysts; (b) Mechanism diagram of Cu@Cu2O/RGO/CE photocatalytic degradation of MO; (c) Elasticity test map; and (d) plasticity of BMFAs [94,95].