| Literature DB >> 35214816 |
Nevena Opačić1, Sanja Radman1, Sanja Fabek Uher1, Božidar Benko1, Sandra Voća2, Jana Šic Žlabur2.
Abstract
Conventional agricultural production faces numerous challenges due to the pronounced effects of climate change, particularly global warming, and drought more than ever before in history, with the primary concern being to produce adequate yields and high-quality, nutritious plant material. Likewise, people are increasingly looking for new sources of food and are becoming aware of the importance of a varied diet and its connection to health. In this sense, stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) stands out as a valuable species that is neglected as a food source, as it has a significant content of specialized metabolites, and thus has an extremely high potential for use both nutritionally and pharmacologically, but is still traditionally collected from natural habitats, so it can be of questionable quality and undefined chemical composition. Therefore, sustainable agricultural practices are increasingly shifting to modern hydroponic cultivation methods in greenhouses. The advantage lies in the easier management and control of a number of factors during cultivation (air temperature and relative humidity, balanced and rational fertilization, minimization of nitrate uptake, etc.), ensuring better conditions for the growth and development of nettle according to its needs. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the technology of stinging nettle cultivation in the field and to show the possibilities of cultivation with modern hydroponic techniques to obtain a final product of consistent and uniform quality, high content of specialized metabolites and significant nutritional value. Research on this topic is still sparse but will certainly increase in the future. Therefore, this review provides all the necessary data for such future studies.Entities:
Keywords: Urtica dioica; bioactive compounds; cultivated nettle; functional properties; soilless systems; stress factors
Year: 2022 PMID: 35214816 PMCID: PMC8878654 DOI: 10.3390/plants11040483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The content of the main minerals in nettle depends on the habitats and the part of the plant analyzed.
| Mineral | Content | Method Used | Cultivation or Wild Harvest Location | Plant Part | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | 28,605 μg/g | US EPA, 1994 | wild harvested (Serbia) | dried leaves | [ |
| 853–1050 mg/100 g | unknown | unknown | whole plant | [ | |
| 3.43% | Nowosielski, 1988 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| 2.15–3.09% | AOAC, 1995 | floating hydroponics (Croatia) | leaves | [ | |
| 168.77 mg/100 g | AOAC, 2005 | wild harvested (Nepal) | dry leaves powder | [ | |
| 278–788 mg/100 g | AOAC, 2000 | open field (USA) | shoots before flowering | [ | |
| 323 mg/100 g | AACC Int., 2000 | open field (South Africa) | leaves | [ | |
| 3.04% | 71/250/EEC | open field (Lithuania) | leaves | [ | |
| 2.63–5.09% | AOAC, 1995 | wild harvested (Macedonia) | leaves | [ | |
| 5.21% | AOAC, 1995 | open field (Croatia) | leaves before flowering | [ | |
| Fe | 150.97 μg/g | US EPA, 1994 | wild harvested (Serbia) | dried leaves | [ |
| 227.89 mg/100 g | unknown | unknown | leaf powder | [ | |
| 2–200 mg/100 g | unknown | unknown | whole plant | [ | |
| 79.20–89.50 mg/kg | AOAC, 1995 | floating hydroponics (Croatia) | leaves | [ | |
| 886–3651 mg/kg | AOAC, 1995 | open field (Croatia) | leaves | [ | |
| 227.89 mg/100 g | AOAC, 2005 | wild harvested (Nepal) | dry leaves powder | [ | |
| 1.2–3.4 mg/100 g | AOAC, 2000 | open field (USA) | shoots before flowering | [ | |
| 2.5 mg/100 g | AACC Int., 2000 | open field (South Africa) | leaves | [ | |
| 224.78 mg/kg | 73/46/EEC | open field, (Lithuania) | leaves | [ | |
| 2765 ppm | AOAC, 1995 | open field (Croatia) | leaves before flowering | [ | |
| 145–2717 mg/kg | AOAC, 1995 | open field (Croatia) | leaves before flowering | [ | |
| Mg | 8699.76 μg/g | US EPA, 1994 | wild harvested (Serbia) | dried leaves | [ |
| 0.34% | Nowosielski, 1988 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| 0.23–0.48% | AOAC, 1995 | floating hydroponics (Croatia) | leaves | [ | |
| 104 mg/100 g | AACC Int., 2000 | open field (South Africa) | leaves | [ | |
| 0.61% | 73/46/EEC | open field, (Lithuania) | leaves | [ | |
| 2.51–3.56% | AOAC, 1995 | wild harvested (Macedonia) | leaves | [ | |
| P | 50–265 mg/100 g | unknown | unknown | whole plant | [ |
| 0.39% | Nowosielski, 1988 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| 0.41–0.49% | AOAC, 1995 | floating hydroponics (Croatia) | leaves | [ | |
| 82.6 mg/100 g | AACC Int., 2000 | open field (South Africa) | leaves | [ | |
| 0.82% | 71/393/EEC | open field (Lithuania) | leaves | [ |
The content of SM and antioxidant capacity in nettle depends on the habitats and the part of the plant analyzed.
| Specialized Metabolite | Content | Method Used | Cultivation or Wild Harvest Location | Plant Part | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total carotenoids | 1.62 mg/g | spectrophotometry | wild harvested (Latvia) | leaves (ethanol extract) | [ |
| 51.4–74.8 μg/g | Wills et al., 1988 | wild harvested (Spain) | leaves | [ | |
| 5.47 mg/g | Wellburn, 1994; Dere et al., 1998; Pavlić et al., 2016 | wild harvested (Serbia) | dried leaves (96% ethanol extract) | [ | |
| 2.95–8 mg/100 g | unknown | unknown | whole plant | [ | |
| 33.03 mg/100 g | Castro– Puyana et al. (2017) | wild harvested (Croatia) | leaves and stalks | [ | |
| 1.31 mg/g | Rumiñska et al., 1985 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| 3496.67 μg/g, db | Ranganna (2001) | wild harvested (Nepal) | dry leaves powder | [ | |
| 0.55 mg/g | spectrophotometry | wild harvested (Latvia) | shoots | [ | |
| 0.216–0.323 mg/g | Holm, 1954 and Van Wattstein, 1957 | wild harvested (Bosnia and Herzegovina) | leaves | [ | |
| 15.36 mg/100 g | Strumite et al., 2015 | open field (Lithuania) | leaves | [ | |
| 0.81–1.01 mg/g | Porra et al., 1989 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| β-carotene | 3.8–5.6 μg/g | Wills et al., 1988 | wild harvested (Spain) | leaves | [ |
| 5035–7860 IU/100 g | colorimetry | open field (USA) | shoots before flowering | [ | |
| 58,059 μg/100 g | colorimetry | open field (South Africa) | leaves | [ | |
| Total chlorophyll | 24.13 mg/g | Wellburn, 1994; Dere et al., 1998; Pavlić et al., 2016 | wild harvested (Serbia) | dried leaves (96% ethanol extract) | [ |
| 4.8 mg/g | unknown | wild harvested | leaves | [ | |
| 611.19 mg/100 g | Castro–Puyana et al. (2017) | wild harvested (Croatia) | leaves and stalks | [ | |
| 9.66 mg/g | Rumiñska et al., 1985 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| 1.02–1.174 mg/g | Holm, 1954 and Van Wattstein, 1957 | wild harvested (Bosnia and Herzegovina) | leaves | [ | |
| 2.17 mg/g | spectrophotometry | wild harvested (Latvia) | shoots | [ | |
| 8.03–9.45 mg/g | Porra et al., 1989 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| Chlorophyll a | 5.56 mg/g | spectrophotometer | wild harvested (Latvia) | leaves (ethanol extract) | [ |
| 16.55 mg/g | Wellburn, 1994; Dere et al., 1998; Pavlić et al., 2016 | wild harvested (Serbia) | dried leaves (96% ethanol extract) | [ | |
| 0.698–0.882 mg/g | Holm, 1954 and Van Wattstein, 1957 | wild harvested (Bosnia and Herzegovina) | leaves | [ | |
| 67.29 mg/100 g | Strumite et al., 2015 | open field (Lithuania) | leaves | [ | |
| Chlorophyll b | 1.84 mg/100 g | spectrophotometer | wild harvested (Latvia) | leaves (ethanol extract) | [ |
| 7.58 mg/g | Wellburn, 1994; Dere et al., 1998; Pavlić et al., 2016 | wild harvested (Serbia) | dried leaves (96% ethanol extract) | [ | |
| 0.285–0.320 mg/g | Holm, 1954 and Van Wattstein, 1957 | wild harvested (Bosnia and Herzegovina) | leaves | [ | |
| 29.14 mg/100 g | Strumite et al., 2015 | open field (Lithuania) | leaves | [ | |
| Total phenolics | 128.75 mg GAE/g | unknown | unknown | leaf powder | [ |
| 380.90 mg/100 g | Repajić et al., 2020 | wild harvested (Croatia) | leaves and stalks | [ | |
| 14.47 mg/g | Slinghart et al., 1977 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| 140 mg GAE/g | Folin–Ciocalteu | wild harvested (Italy) | leaves | [ | |
| 450.81–539.27 mg GAE/g | Folin–Ciocalteu | unknown (Serbia) | dried leaves (different extraction methods) | [ | |
| 128.75 mg GAE/g | Ranganna, 2001 | wild harvested (Nepal) | dry leaves powder | [ | |
| 26.78 mg GAE/g | unknown | wild harvested (Turkey) | USB extract | [ | |
| 208.37 mg GAE/g | Folin–Ciocalteu | wild harvested (Bosnia and Herzegovina) | leaves | [ | |
| 118.4 mg GAE/g | Folin–Ciocalteu | open field (South Africa) | leaves | [ | |
| 8.87 mg GAE/g | Folin–Ciocalteu | open field (Lithuania) | leaves | [ | |
| 732.49 mg GAE/100 g | Ough and Amerine, 1988 | open field (Croatia) | leaves before flowering | [ | |
| 22.01–24.94 mg/g | Folin–Ciocalteu | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| 7.9 g/100 g | Folin–Ciocalteu | wild harvested (Portugal) | dry aerial parts during flowering | [ | |
| 28.42 μg/g | Orčić et al., 2014 | wild harvested (Serbia) | herb | [ | |
| Vitamin C | 20–60 mg/100 g | unknown | unknown | whole plant | [ |
| 8.4 mg/g | Kampfenkel et al., 1995 | wild harvested (Italy) | leaves | [ | |
| 0.5–1.1 mg/100 g | AOAC, 2000 | open field (USA | shoots before flowering | [ | |
| 14.2 mg/100 g | HPLC | open field (South Africa) | leaves | [ | |
| 8.53 mg/100 g | Latimer, 2016 | open field (Lithuania) | leaves | [ | |
| 63.75 mg/100 g | AOAC, 2002 | open field (Croatia) | leaves before flowering | [ | |
| Antioxidant capacity | 60 mg TEAC/g | Brand-Williams et al., 1995 | wild harvested (Italy) | leaves | [ |
| 26.5 μM Trolox/g | Re et al., 1999 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ | |
| 66.3% DPPH | Nuengchamnong et al., 2009 | wild harvested (Nepal) | dry leaves powder | [ | |
| 0.85% DPPH | DPPH | wild harvested (Bosnia and Herzegovina) | leaves (ethanol extract) | [ | |
| 65.1% DPPH | Brand-Williams et al., 1995 | open field (South Africa) | leaves | [ | |
| 70.37% DPPH | Zeipina et al., 2015 | open field (Lithuania) | leaves | [ | |
| 1936.58 mM Trolox/L | Miller et al., 1993; Re et al., 1999 | open field (Croatia) | leaves before flowering | [ | |
| 10.95–11.80 μM Trolox/g | Re et al., 1999 | open field (Poland) | leaves | [ |
Figure 1Urtica dioica seeds.
Figure 2(a) Nettle seedlings in polystyrene containers; (b) Nettle herb growing in the open field.
Figure 3Harvesting nettle in open field.
Figure 4Graphical scheme of floating hydroponics cultivation. 1—water; A, B, C—tanks for concentrated nutrient solutions and injectors; 2—tank for standard nutrient solution; 3—pump; 4—basin with polystyrene containers or boards.
Figure 5(a) Placing of polystyrene boards in floating hydroponics basins after initial germination of nettle seeds (b) Beginning of herb growth; (c) Nettle plants before flowering, ready for harvest; (d) Harvest above plants first two nodules to allow retrovegetation.