| Literature DB >> 29987208 |
Dorota Kregiel1, Ewelina Pawlikowska2, Hubert Antolak3.
Abstract
Nettles (genus Urtica, family Urticaceae) are of considerable interest as preservatives in foods for both human and animal consumption. They have also been used for centuries in traditional medicine. This paper reviews the properties of nettles that make them suitable for wider applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Nettles contain a significant number of biologically-active compounds. For example, the leaves are rich sources of terpenoids, carotenoids and fatty acids, as well as of various essential amino acids, chlorophyll, vitamins, tannins, carbohydrates, sterols, polysaccharides, isolectins and minerals. Extracts from the aerial parts of nettles are rich sources of polyphenols, while the roots contain oleanol acid, sterols and steryl glycosides. Due to the variety of phytochemicals and their proportions they contain, nettles show noticeable activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. These properties make nettles suitable for a range of possible applications, including functional food, dietary supplements and pharmacological formulations. Despite these benefits, the nettle is still an underestimated plant source. This paper provides a unique overview of the latest research on nettle plants focusing on the possibilities for transforming a common weed into a commercial plant with a wide range of applications. Special attention is paid to the antimicrobial activity of the active compounds in nettles and to possible uses of these valuable plants in food and feed formulations.Entities:
Keywords: Urtica spp.; animal breeding; antimicrobial activity; antioxidant activity; bioactive compounds; food industry; traditional medicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29987208 PMCID: PMC6100552 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
The list of species belonging to the Urtica genus [1,11,12].
| No. | Name | Synonyms | Habitats |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | China, Japan, Korea | ||
| 2 | Bhutan, India, Nepal, Sikkim | ||
| 3 | China -Guizhou, Sichuan, Yunnan | ||
| 4 | - | France, Italy, Spain | |
| 5 | - | Colombia, Ecuador | |
| 6 | - | Chile, Bolivia, Argentina, Colombia | |
| 7 | - | Chile, Argentina | |
| 8 | Russia, Sweden, Netherlands, China | ||
| 9 | United States, Mexico | ||
| 10 | Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay | ||
| 11 | United States, New Zealand, Turkey, Europe | ||
| 12 | Bolivia, Peru, Argentina, Ecuador | ||
| 13 | China, Taiwan, Egypt, Vietnam | ||
| 14 | - | Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Chile, Colombia | |
| 15 | - | Russia, Ukraine, Belarus | |
| 16 | Chile | ||
| 17 | - | Turkey | |
| 18 | Nepal, India, China | ||
| 19 | Europe, Israel, Russia | ||
| 20 | - | China, Japan, Korea | |
| 21 | Costa Rica, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador | ||
| 22 | Argentina | ||
| 23 | - | Ecuador, Peru, Colombia | |
| 24 | - | Ecuador, Peru | |
| 25 | Chile, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, Ecuador | ||
| 26 | - | China, India, Bhutan | |
| 27 | - | Chile | |
| 28 | Europe, Algeria | ||
| 29 | - | Mexico, Guatemala | |
| 30 | Peru, Chile, Argentina | ||
| 31 | - | Europe | |
| 32 | - | Mexico, United States, Cuba | |
| 33 | - | Nepal, India, United States, China, Bhutan | |
| 34 | Tunisia, Israel, Cyprus, Costa Rica, Turkey | ||
| 35 | Japan, Russia | ||
| 36 | - | Mexico | |
| 37 | - | Mexico | |
| 38 | - | Italy | |
| 39 | Canada | ||
| 40 | - | Mexico | |
| 41 | - | Spain, Mexico | |
| 42 | - | Taiwan | |
| 43 | Japan, Korea, China | ||
| 44 | - | China | |
| 45 | Chile, Bolivia, Peru | ||
| 46 | Unite States, Mexico, Europe, Israel, New Zealand |
Chemical composition of nettle leaf powders [10].
| Parameter | Content |
|---|---|
| Moisture (%) | 7.04 ± 0.77 |
| Crude protein (%) | 33.77 ± 0.35 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 9.08 ± 0.14 |
| Crude fat (%) | 3.55 ± 0.06 |
| Total ash (%) | 16.21 ± 0.54 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 37.39 ± 0.72 |
| Calcium (mg/100 g) | 168.77 ± 1.47 |
| Iron (mg/100 g) | 227.89 ± 0.21 |
| Tannins (%) | 0.93 ± 0.01 |
| Polyphenols (mg GAE/g) | 128.75 ± 0.21 |
| Carotenoids (μg/g, db) | 3496.67 ± 0.56 |
| Caloric value (kcal/100 g) | 307.24 ± 0.13 |
The phenolic profiles in U. dioica extracts (mg per g of dry extract) [20].
| Group of Compounds | Compound | Origin | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Flowers | Leaves | Steams | Roots | Flowers | Leaves | Steams | Roots | ||
| Phenolic acids | 0.064/0.017 | 0.037/0.021 | 0.021/0.023 | 0.032/0.029 | 0.036 | 0.051 | 0.014 | 0.048 | |
| Gentisic acid | 0.0096/0.0044 | 0.0034/0.0082 | not det/det | not det/0.036 | not det | det | not det | not det | |
| Protocatechuic acid | 0.070/0.032 | 0.48/0.16 | not det/0.014 | not det/0.015 | 0.022 | 0.072 | 0.0069 | 0.0106 | |
| Vanillic acid | det */not det ** | not det/det | not det/not det | not det/det | not det | not det | not det | 0.09 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Ferulic acid | 0.071/0.09 | 0.009/0.013 | 0.031/0.061 | 0.011/0.028 | 0.05 | 0.052 | 0.024 | 0.024 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Coumarins | Esculetin | 0.041/0.0078 | 0.0120/0.0125 | 0.015/0.019 | det/0.0047 | 0.0095 | 0.0074 | det | det |
| Scopoletin | 0.103/0.018 | 0.12/0.21 | 0.026/0.054 | 0.076/0.11 | 0.04 | 0.073 | 0.048 | 0.18 | |
| Lignans | Secoisolariciresinol | not det/not det | not det/not det | not det/not det | det/0.2 | not det | not det | not det | 0.009 |
| Flavones | Chrysoeriol | det/det | det/det | det/det | det/det | 0.0027 | det | det | det |
| Flavonols | Kaempferol | det/0.007 | not det/not det | not det/det | not det/not det | 0.019 | not det | not det | not det |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Quercitrin | 0.0124/not det | not det/not det | not det/not det | not det/not det | not det | not det | not det | not det | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Isorhamnetin | det/0.036 | not det/not det | not det/det | not det/not det | 0.047 | not det | not det | not det | |
| Biflavonoids | Amentoflavone | det/det | det/det | det/det | det/det | det | det | det | det |
| Flavan-3-ols | Catechin | not det/0.076 | not det/not det | not det/not det | not det/not det | 1.0 | not det | not det | not det |
* det: peak observed, but the concentration was too low to evaluate it; ** not det: peak not observed. Bolded compounds are those that occur at the highest concentration.
In vitro activity of Urtica spp. against microorganisms.
| Microorganisms | Location | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Turkey | [ | |
|
| Iraq | [ | |
| Iraq | [ | ||
|
| Turkey | [ | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| India | [ | ||
|
| Macedonia | [ | |
| Iraq | [ | ||
| 15 different strains of | Iran | [ | |
|
| Iran | [ | |
|
| Turkey | [ | |
|
| |||
|
| Iran | [ | |
|
| Turkey | [ | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Tunisia | [ |
In vitro activity of Urtica spp. against microorganisms: minimal inhibitory concentrations.
| Microorganisms | Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) | Location | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36.21 mg/mL | Serbia | [ | ||
| 66.66 mg/mL | Iran | [ | ||
|
| 33.33 mg/mL | |||
|
| 33.33 mg/mL | |||
| 8.33 mg/mL | ||||
|
| 0.13 mg/mL | |||
|
| 16.66 mg/mL | |||
| 66.66 mg/mL | ||||
| 125 µg/mL | India | [ | ||
|
| 31.25 µg/mL | India | [ | |
| 1.8 µg/mL | Iran | [ | ||
| Methicillin-sensitive strains of | 0.188–0.500 mg/mL | Portugal | [ |