Literature DB >> 35212338

Developing end-point methods for absolute binding free energy calculation using the Boltzmann-quasiharmonic model.

Lauren Wickstrom1, Emilio Gallicchio2,3,4, Lieyang Chen3,4,5, Tom Kurtzman3,4,5, Nanjie Deng6.   

Abstract

Understanding the physical forces underlying receptor-ligand binding requires robust methods for analyzing the binding thermodynamics. In end-point binding free energy methods the binding free energy is naturally decomposable into physically intuitive contributions such as the solvation free energy and configurational entropy that can provide insights. Here we present a new end-point method called EE-BQH (Effective Energy-Boltzmann-Quasiharmonic) which combines the Boltzmann-Quasiharmonic model for configurational entropy with different solvation free energy methods, such as the continuum solvent PBSA model and the integral equation-based 3D-RISM, to estimate the absolute binding free energy. We compare EE-BQH with other treatments of configurational entropy such as Quasiharmonic models in internal coordinates (QHIC) and in Cartesian coordinates (QHCC), and Normal Mode analysis (NMA), by testing them on the octa acids host-guest complexes from the SAMPL8 blind challenge. The accuracies in the calculated absolute binding free energies strongly depend on the configurational entropy and solvation free energy methods used. QHIC and BQH yield the best agreements with the established potential of mean force (PMF) estimates, with R2 of ∼0.7 and mean unsigned error of ∼1.7 kcal mol-1. These results from the end-point calculations are also in similar agreement with experiments. While 3D-RISM in combination with QHIC or BQH lead to reasonable correlations with the PMF results and experiments, the calculated absolute binding free energies are underestimated by ∼5 kcal mol-1. While the binding is accompanied by a significant reduction in the ligand translational/rotational entropy, the change in the torsional entropy in these host-guest systems is slightly positive. Compared with BQH, QHIC underestimates the reduction of configurational entropy because of the non-Gaussian probability distributions in the ligand rotation and a small number of torsions. The study highlights the crucial role of configurational entropy in determining binding and demonstrates the potential of using the new end-point method to provide insights in more complex protein-ligand systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35212338      PMCID: PMC9044818          DOI: 10.1039/d1cp05075c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.945


  69 in total

1.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  MMPBSA.py: An Efficient Program for End-State Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Bill R Miller; T Dwight McGee; Jason M Swails; Nadine Homeyer; Holger Gohlke; Adrian E Roitberg
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  MIST: Maximum Information Spanning Trees for dimension reduction of biological data sets.

Authors:  Bracken M King; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Yujie Wu; Yuqing Deng; Byungchan Kim; Levi Pierce; Goran Krilov; Dmitry Lupyan; Shaughnessy Robinson; Markus K Dahlgren; Jeremy Greenwood; Donna L Romero; Craig Masse; Jennifer L Knight; Thomas Steinbrecher; Thijs Beuming; Wolfgang Damm; Ed Harder; Woody Sherman; Mark Brewer; Ron Wester; Mark Murcko; Leah Frye; Ramy Farid; Teng Lin; David L Mobley; William L Jorgensen; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Robert Abel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics Calculations Using Chemical Host and Guest: A Comprehensive Picture of Molecular Recognition.

Authors:  Zhiye Tang; Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Interaction Entropy: A New Paradigm for Highly Efficient and Reliable Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy.

Authors:  Lili Duan; Xiao Liu; John Z H Zhang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Using the fast fourier transform in binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Trung Hai Nguyen; Huan-Xiang Zhou; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Standard binding free energies from computer simulations: What is the best strategy?

Authors:  James C Gumbart; Benoît Roux; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Comparing alchemical and physical pathway methods for computing the absolute binding free energy of charged ligands.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; Di Cui; Bin W Zhang; Junchao Xia; Jeffrey Cruz; Ronald Levy
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.676

10.  Thermodynamic Decomposition of Solvation Free Energies with Particle Mesh Ewald and Long-Range Lennard-Jones Interactions in Grid Inhomogeneous Solvation Theory.

Authors:  Lieyang Chen; Anthony Cruz; Daniel R Roe; Andrew C Simmonett; Lauren Wickstrom; Nanjie Deng; Tom Kurtzman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  1 in total

1.  Potential effects of metal ion induced two-state allostery on the regulatory mechanism of add adenine riboswitch.

Authors:  Lei Bao; Wen-Bin Kang; Yi Xiao
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-10-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.