| Literature DB >> 35210442 |
Won-Gun Yun1, Joong Kee Youn1,2, Hyoun-Joong Kong3,4,5, Hyun-Young Kim6,7, Dayoung Ko1, Inhwa Yeom8,9, Hyun-Jin Joo8,10.
Abstract
There is an increasing demand and need for patients and caregivers to actively participate in the treatment process. However, when there are unexpected findings during pediatrics surgery, access restrictions in the operating room may lead to a lack of understanding of the medical condition, as the caregivers are forced to indirectly hear about it. To overcome this, we designed a tele-consent system that operates through a specially constructed mixed reality (MR) environment during surgery. We enrolled 11 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia and their caregivers among the patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy between January through February 2021. The caregivers were informed of the intraoperative findings in real-time through MR glasses outside the operating room. After surgery, we conducted questionnaire surveys to evaluate the satisfaction and usefulness of tele-consent. We identified contralateral patent processus vaginalis in seven out of 11 patients, and then additionally performed surgery on the contralateral side with tele-consent from their caregivers. Most caregivers and surgeons answered positively about the satisfaction and usefulness of tele-consent. This study found that tele-consent with caregivers using MR glasses not only increased the satisfaction of caregivers and surgeons, but also helped to accommodate real-time findings by adapting surgical plan through the tele-consent.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35210442 PMCID: PMC8873334 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06653-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographics of patients.
| Variables | N = 11 |
|---|---|
| Median (range) | 3.7 (0.1–8.5) |
| 2.7 | |
| Median (range) | 99.4 (50.6–130.6) |
| Median (range) | 15.4 (4.3–30.6) |
| Rt | 5 |
| Lt | 6 |
| Rt. inguinal hernia → Lt. PPV | 4 |
| Lt. inguinal hernia → Rt. PPV | 3 |
| Mean (SD) | 34.5 (8.50) |
| 0 | |
Lt. left, Rt. Right, PPV patent processus vaginalis.
Demographics of caregivers who responded to the survey.
| Variable | N = 11 |
|---|---|
| Median (IQR) | 39 (37.5–41.5) |
| 0.38 | |
| Father (%) | 3 (27.3) |
| Mother (%) | 8 (72.7) |
| High school (%) | 1 (9.1) |
| College (%) | 9 (81.8) |
| Graduation (%) | 1 (9.1) |
| Middle income (%) | 9 (81.8) |
| Refused to respond (%) | 2 (18.2) |
IQR interquartile range.
Results based on survey of caregivers’ tele-consent.
| Variable | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I am familiar with MR | 1.8 | 0.75 | 1 | 3 |
| Communication with the medical staff was comfortable | 4.6 | 0.50 | 4 | 5 |
| I received information from the medical staff | 4.2 | 0.40 | 4 | 5 |
| The medical staff was confident in the treatment plan | 4.5 | 0.52 | 4 | 5 |
| Total average | 4.5 | 0.24 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Next time in the same situation, I would like to hear the non-face-to-face explanation as it was in this case, rather than the old way | 4.1 | 0.54 | 3 | 5 |
| Overall, I was satisfied with the new device | 4.6 | 0.50 | 4 | 5 |
| I will recommend the new device to my family or friends | 4.4 | 0.50 | 4 | 5 |
| Total average | 4.4 | 0.27 | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| Time was saved by using the device | 4.5 | 0.52 | 4 | 5 |
| The disease was properly treated | 4.7 | 0.47 | 4 | 5 |
| Anxiety about limited access to the medical environment was reduced | 4.5 | 0.52 | 4 | 5 |
| Total average | 4.6 | 0.10 | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| It was not difficult to use the device | 4.6 | 0.50 | 4 | 5 |
| There was no reluctance to use the device | 4.7 | 0.47 | 4 | 5 |
| The display worked properly | 4.5 | 0.52 | 4 | 5 |
| The data processing speed was fast | 4.8 | 0.40 | 4 | 5 |
| The device was ready quickly | 4.2 | 0.60 | 3 | 5 |
| The device worked fine overall | 4.8 | 0.40 | 4 | 5 |
| Total average | 4.6 | 0.24 | 4.2 | 4.8 |
| 4.7 | 0.47 | 4 | 5 | |
| 4.5 | 0.12 | 4.4 | 4.6 | |
MR mixed reality, SD standard deviation, Min minimum, Max maximum.
Caregivers’ usefulness ratings of the tele-consent using mixed reality glasses, based on communication, satisfaction, effect on treatment, ease of using.
| Variable | Mean% (± SD) | Median% (min–max) |
|---|---|---|
| Communication | 89.1 (4.81) | 90.9 (83.6–82.7) |
| Satisfaction | 87.9 (4.58) | 87.3 (83.6–92.7) |
| Effect on treatment | 90.3 (2.10) | 90.9 (90.3–94.5) |
| Ease of using | 92.4 (4.80) | 93.6 (83.6–96.4) |
Subscale scores are presented as percentages of the maximum possible score (5 points for 11 caregivers, 55 points).
SD standard deviation, Min minimum, Max maximum.
Results of surgeon survey following tele-consent.
| Variable | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I am familiar with MR | 4.3 | 0.58 | 4 | 5 |
| Communication with caregiver was comfortable | 4.3 | 0.58 | 4 | 5 |
| I was able to provide sufficient information to the caregiver | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| The non-face-to-face communication method using the new device was satisfactory | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| Total average | 4.8 | 0.38 | 4.3 | 5.0 |
| The device system was suitable for medical communication | 4.0 | 1.73 | 2 | 5 |
| Overall, I was satisfied with the non-face-to-face explanation process | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| I would like to continue the non-face-to-face explanation method in the future | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| I think this device will be helpful for medical communication in the future | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| Total average | 4.8 | 0.50 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Time was saved by using the device | 4.0 | 1.73 | 2 | 5 |
| The non-face-to-face explanation helped to form a rapport with the caregiver | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| The disease was properly treated | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| Total average | 4.7 | 0.58 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| It was not difficult to use the device | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| There was no reluctance to use the device | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| A lot of learning was required to use the device | 2.7 | 0.58 | 2 | 3 |
| The display worked properly | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| The microphone and speaker worked properly | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| The data processing speed was fast | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| The device preparation process was not difficult | 2.3 | 1.15 | 1 | 3 |
| Overall, the device was convenient to use | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| There was no increase in physical fatigue after non-face-to-face communication | 5.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 5 |
| 4.4 | 1.11 | 2.3 | 5.0 | |
| 4.7 | 0.15 | 4.4 | 4.8 | |
MR mixed reality, SD standard deviation, Min minimum, Max maximum.
Surgeons’ usefulness ratings of the tele-consent using mixed reality glasses, regarding communication, satisfaction, effect on treatment, ease of using.
| Variable | Mean% (± SD) | Median% (min–max) |
|---|---|---|
| Communication | 95.6 (7.70) | 100.0 (86.7–100.0) |
| Satisfaction | 95.0 (10.00) | 100.0 (80.0–100.0) |
| Effect on treatment | 93.3 (11.55) | 100.0 (80.0–100.0) |
| Ease of using | 88.9 (22.11) | 100.0 (46.67–100.0) |
Subscale scores are presented as percentages of the maximum possible score (5 points for 3 surgeons, 15 points).
SD standard deviation, Min minimum, Max maximum.