| Literature DB >> 35207237 |
Kgomotso M G Mokoala1, Ismaheel O Lawal1,2, Letjie C Maserumule1, Khanyisile N Hlongwa1, Honest Ndlovu1, Janet Reed1, Meshack Bida3, Alex Maes1,4, Christophe van de Wiele1,5, Johncy Mahapane1, Cindy Davis1, Jae Min Jeong6,7, Gbenga Popoola8, Mariza Vorster1,2, Mike M Sathekge1,2.
Abstract
Hypoxia in cervical cancer has been associated with a poor prognosis. Over the years 68Ga labelled nitroimidazoles have been studied and have shown improved kinetics. We present our initial experience of hypoxia Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging in cervical cancer with 68Ga-Nitroimidazole derivative and the correlation with 18F-FDG PET/CT and immunohistochemistry. Twenty women with cervical cancer underwent both 18F-FDG and 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET/CT imaging. Dual-point imaging was performed for 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed with hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). We documented SUVmax, SUVmean of the primary lesions as well as tumor to muscle ratio (TMR), tumor to blood (TBR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and hypoxic tumor volume (HTV). There was no significant difference in the uptake of 68Ga-Nitroimidazole between early and delayed imaging. Twelve patients had uptake on 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET. Ten patients demonstrated varying intensities of HIF-1α expression and six of these also had uptake on 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET. We found a strong negative correlation between HTV and immunohistochemical staining (r = -0.660; p = 0.019). There was no correlation between uptake on PET imaging and immunohistochemical analysis with HIF-1α. Two-thirds of the patients demonstrated hypoxia on 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET imaging.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-FDG; 68Ga-Nitroimidazole; HIF-1α; cervical cancer; hypoxia; immunohistochemistry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35207237 PMCID: PMC8876585 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11040962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Demographic characteristics of the patient cohort.
| Variable | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Mean ± SD | 44.65 ± 11.43 | |
| Range | 26–72 | |
|
| ||
| Mucinous endocervical carcinoma | 1 | 5.0 |
| Papillary squamourethelial carcinoma | 1 | 5.0 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 16 | 80.0 |
| Papillary surface serous carcinoma | 1 | 5.0 |
| Adenocarcinoma | 1 | 5.0 |
|
| ||
| IIB | 3 | 15.0 |
| IIIA | 1 | 5.0 |
| IIIB | 9 | 45.0 |
| IIIC | 2 | 10.0 |
| IIIC1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| IIIC2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| IVA | 2 | 10.0 |
| IVB | 1 | 5.0 |
SD: Standard Deviation; FIGO: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Figure 1The mean SUVmax, SUVmean, tumor to muscle ratio (TMR) and tumor to blood ratio (TBR) for 18F-FDG and 68Ga-Nitroimidazole at 30 and 60 min. * PET: Positron Emission Tomography
Immunohistochemical analysis and correlation to 68Ga-Nitroimidazole imaging qualitative assessment.
| Patient No. | Histological Subtype | Intensity of Staining of HIF-1α | Percentage Distribution of HIF-1α Expression | Sum of Intensity and Distribution (Out of 6) | Qualitative 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 3 | 25% | 4 | 2 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 3 | 75 % | 6 | 2 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 3 | 75% | 6 | 2 |
|
| Papillary surface serous carcinoma | 2 | 75% | 5 | 0 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 3 | 75% | 6 | 0 |
|
| Adenocarcinoma | 3 | 75% | 6 | 2 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 0 | - | 0 | 2 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 2 | 25% | 3 | 2 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 0 | - | 0 | 2 |
|
| Papillary squamo-urothelial carcinoma | 1 | 25% | 2 | 1 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 0 | - | 0 | 1 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 1 | 25% | 2 | 2 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 0 | - | 0 | 2 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 1 | 25% | 2 | 2 |
Intensity of staining: 0 = no staining, 1 = weak intensity, 2 = moderate intensity, 3 = strong intensity. Sum of intensity and percentage distribution out of a total of 6 (see methods section for detailed description). Values above 3 were considered positive for hypoxia. Qualitative 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET findings: 0 = no uptake, 1 = uptake similar to background, 2 = focal uptake above background, 3 = focal uptake markedly above background.
Figure 2A 36-year-old female patient with FIGO stage II, squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. (A). 18F-FDG PET transaxial image through the pelvis demonstrating uptake in the primary tumor (red arrow) with minimal uptake in the urinary bladder (blue arrow) (B). 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET transaxial image through the same plane exhibiting spatially incongruent uptake with inhomogeneous uptake in parts of the tumor (red arrow) and intense activity in the urinary bladder (blue arrow). (C) is the corresponding CT only image in the same plane with target organs marked with arrows. The fractional hypoxic volume was 36%.
Figure 3The immunohistochemical staining of HIF-1α expression in the endocervical biopsy specimen of the patient in Figure 2. Well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma ×20 magnification. The tumor areas with well differentiated cells (yellow arrow) with brown staining, demonstrate HIF-1α expression, while the areas with other cell types (orange arrow) demonstrate little to no HIF-1α expression.
SUVmax and TMR from the 18F-FDG and 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET/CT scans correlated with the HIF-1α expression.
| Hypoxia on Staining | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Weak | Moderate | Strong | |||
| Median (Range) | Median (Range) | Median (Range) | Median (Range) | K | ||
| 18F-FDG SUVmax | 17.32 (11.82–17.81) | 21.21 (11.64–22.42) | 13.70 (13.41–13.99) | 17.50 (16.09–30.77) | 2.927 | 0.403 |
| 18F-FDG TMR | 30.00 (21.00–43.00) | 38.00 (22.00–46.00) | 27.00 (27.00–27.00) | 32.00 (18.00–50.00) | 0.670 | 0.880 |
| 68Ga-Ni SUVmax(1) | 3.73 (1.00–4.00) | 3.38 (3.00–4.00) | 2.08 (2.00–2.00) | 4.10 (2.00–5.00) | 2.795 | 0.424 |
| 68Ga-Ni SUVmax(2) | 3.71 (1.60–4.19) | 3.06 (3.04–3.15) | 1.77 (1.62–1.91) | 3.57 (2.78–4.32) | 4.342 | 0.227 |
| 68Ga-Ni TMR | 8.00 (4.00–10.00) | 9.50 (8.00–11.00) | 10.00 (6.00–14.00) | 15.00 (7.00–24.00) | 2.669 | 0.446 |
| 68Ga-Ni TMR 2 | 11.00 (6.00–16.00) | 15.00 (7.00–17.00) | 7.50 (7.00–8.00) | 12.00 (7.00–26.00) | 1.852 | 0.604 |
K: Kruskal–Wallis test, 68Ga-Nitroimidazole maximum standardized uptake value (68Ga-Ni SUVmax): 68Ga-Ni SUVmax (1) and 68Ga-Ni SUVmax (2): SUVmax at 30 and 60 min post tracer injection, respectively; 68Ga-Nitroimidazole tumor to muscle ratio (68Ga-Ni TMR): 68Ga-Ni TMR and 68Ga-Ni TMR 2 are the tumor to muscle ratio at 30 and 60 min post tracer injection, respectively.
Figure 4Scatterplot showing the relationship between the hypoxia score (data shown in the X-axis) and SUVmean of the primary tumor derived from the delayed 68Ga-Nitroimidazole PET images.