| Literature DB >> 35206130 |
Wenwen Du1, Huijun Wang1, Chang Su1, Xiaofang Jia1, Bing Zhang1.
Abstract
The effects of long-term urbanization changes in obesity are unclear. Data were obtained from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) 1989-2018. A multidimensional urbanicity index was used to define the urbanization level for communities. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify distinct urbanization change trajectories. Gender-stratified multilevel models were used to investigate the association between urbanization trajectories and weight/BMI, through the PROC MIXED procedure, as well as the risk of being overweight + obesity (OO)/obesity (OB), through the PROC GLIMMIX procedure. A total of three patterns of the trajectory of change in urbanization were identified in 304 communities (with 1862 measurements). A total of 25.8% of communities had a low initial urbanization level and continuous increase (termed "LU"), 22.2% of communities had a low-middle initial urbanization level and constant increase (termed "LMU"), and 52.0% of communities had a middle-high initial urbanization and significant increase before 2009, followed by a stable platform since then (termed "MHU"). During the 30 follow-up years, a total of 69490 visits, contributed by 16768 adult participants, were included in the analysis. In the period, weight and BMI were observed in an increasing trend in all urbanization trajectory groups, among both men and women. Compared with LU, men living in MHU were related to higher weight, BMI, and an increased risk of OO (OR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.26 to 1.69). No significant associations were found between urbanization trajectories and OB risk in men. Among women, the associations between urbanization and all obesity indicators became insignificant after controlling the covariates. Obesity indicators increased along with urbanization in the past thirty years in China. However, the differences among urbanization trajectories narrowed over time. More urbanized features were only significantly associated with a higher risk of obesity indicators in Chinese men. The effects of urbanization on obesity among women were buffered.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; group-based trajectory modeling; obesity; trajectory; urbanization; weight
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206130 PMCID: PMC8871544 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Trajectory modeling identified three urbanization patterns.
Demographic characteristics of the baseline sample by gender.
| Men | Women | Overall | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8094 | 8674 | 16,768 |
| Age (years) | 36.79 ± 12.63 | 37.17 ± 12 | 36.99 ± 12.31 |
| Weight (kg) | 62.69 ± 10.85 | 55.03 ± 9.17 | 58.73 ± 10.72 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.33 ± 3.18 | 22.46 ± 3.28 | 22.4 ± 3.23 |
| Entry year (%) | |||
| 1989 | 26.77 | 27.07 | 26.93 |
| 1991 | 18.16 | 16.46 | 17.28 |
| 1993 | 3.98 | 2.7 | 3.32 |
| 1997 | 12.64 | 11.53 | 12.06 |
| 2000 | 7.34 | 7.98 | 7.67 |
| 2004 | 6.6 | 7.02 | 6.82 |
| 2006 | 3.32 | 3.2 | 3.26 |
| 2009 | 5.91 | 6.41 | 6.17 |
| 2011 | 10.75 | 11.72 | 11.25 |
| 2015 | 4.53 | 5.9 | 5.24 |
| Urbanization trajectories (%) | |||
| LU | 28.07 | 26.2 | 27.11 |
| LMU | 25.17 | 24.42 | 24.78 |
| MHU | 46.76 | 49.38 | 48.12 |
| a OO (%) | 25.91 | 27.88 | 26.93 |
| b OB (%) | 5.76 | 5.86 | 5.81 |
a OO was defined as BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2; b OB was defined as BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2. The continuous variables (age, weight, and BMI) were expressed as mean ± sd.; abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; LU, low urbanization; LMU, low–middle urbanization; MHU, middle–high urbanization; OO, overweight; OB, obesity.
Multilevel mixed regression estimates, examining weight and BMI by gender.
| Urbanization Trajectories | Weight | BMI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 a | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 b | |
| Men | ||||||
| LU (ref) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| LMU | 1.64 * | 1.11 * | 0.19 | 0.44 * | 0.30 * | 0.10 |
| MHU | 5.52 * | 4.17 * | 0.61 * | 1.17 * | 0.81 * | 0.19 * |
| Women | ||||||
| LU (ref) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| LMU | 1.27 * | 1.05 * | 0.27 | 0.30 * | 0.29 * | 0.11 |
| MHU | 2.80 * | 2.31 * | 0.21 | 0.45 * | 0.47 * | 0.03 |
Model 1 includes urbanization trajectories only; Model 2 includes survey year, education level, smoke, drinking, age, income, dietary energy intake, and physical activity, based on Model 1; Model 3 a includes entry age and entry weight on Model 2; Model 3 b includes entry age and entry BMI on Model 2; *, p < 0.05; abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; LU, low urbanization; LMU, low–middle urbanization; MHU, middle–high urbanization.
Figure 2Predicted weight in men (a) and women (b) and predicted BMI in men (c) and women (d) by urbanization trajectories. Predicted weight/BMI was generated from multilevel mixed models, controlled for survey year, education level, smoke, drinking, age, income, dietary energy intake, physical activity, entry age, and entry weight/BMI. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; LU, low urbanization; LMU, low–middle urbanization; MHU, middle–high urbanization.
Multilevel mixed regression analysis of associations between urbanization trajectories and risk of obesity by gender.
| Urbanization Trajectories | OO (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2) | OB (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Men | ||||||
| LU (ref) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| LMU | 1.35(1.18,1.55) * | 1.22(1.05,1.42) * | 1.14(0.98,1.31) | 1.56(1.29,1.89) * | 1.36(1.11,1.66) * | 1.22(0.99,1.52) |
| MHU | 2.53(2.24,2.85) * | 1.97(1.70,2.27) * | 1.46(1.26,1.69) * | 2.13(1.80,2.52) * | 1.60(1.31,1.96) * | 1.09(0.87,1.35) |
| Women | ||||||
| LU (ref) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| LMU | 1.15(1.00,1.32) * | 1.17(1.01,1.35) * | 1.07(0.93,1.22) | 1.21(1.01,1.45) * | 1.24(1.02,1.50) * | 1.05(0.85,1.29) |
| MHU | 1.35(1.20,1.52) * | 1.44(1.24,1.66) * | 1.10(0.95,1.27) | 1.35(1.15,1.58) * | 1.49(1.23,1.81) * | 1.03(0.83,1.27) |
Model 1 only includes urbanization trajectories; Model 2 includes survey year, education level, smoke, drinking, age, income, dietary energy intake, and physical activity, based on Model 1; Model 3 includes entry age and entry BMI on Model 2; *, p < 0.05.