Literature DB >> 29922829

Differences in Obesity Prevalence by Demographic Characteristics and Urbanization Level Among Adults in the United States, 2013-2016.

Craig M Hales1,2, Cheryl D Fryar1, Margaret D Carroll1, David S Freedman3, Yutaka Aoki1, Cynthia L Ogden1.   

Abstract

Importance: Differences in obesity by sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin among US adults have been reported, but differences by urbanization level have been less studied.
Objectives: To provide estimates of obesity by demographic characteristics and urbanization level and to examine trends in obesity prevalence by urbanization level. Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial cross-sectional analysis of measured height and weight among adults aged 20 years or older in the 2001-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population. Exposures: Sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin, education level, smoking status, and urbanization level as assessed by metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs; large: ≥1 million population). Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30) and severe obesity (BMI ≥40) by subgroups in 2013-2016 and trends by urbanization level between 2001-2004 and 2013-2016.
Results: Complete data on weight, height, and urbanization level were available for 10 792 adults (mean age, 48 years; 51% female [weighted]). During 2013-2016, 38.9% (95% CI, 37.0% to 40.7%) of US adults had obesity and 7.6% (95% CI, 6.8% to 8.6%) had severe obesity. Men living in medium or small MSAs had a higher age-adjusted prevalence of obesity compared with men living in large MSAs (42.4% vs 31.8%, respectively; adjusted difference, 9.8 percentage points [95% CI, 5.1 to 14.5 percentage points]); however, the age-adjusted prevalence among men living in non-MSAs was not significantly different compared with men living in large MSAs (38.9% vs 31.8%, respectively; adjusted difference, 4.8 percentage points [95% CI, -2.9 to 12.6 percentage points]). The age-adjusted prevalence of obesity was higher among women living in medium or small MSAs compared with women living in large MSAs (42.5% vs 38.1%, respectively; adjusted difference, 4.3 percentage points [95% CI, 0.2 to 8.5 percentage points]) and among women living in non-MSAs compared with women living in large MSAs (47.2% vs 38.1%, respectively; adjusted difference, 4.7 percentage points [95% CI, 0.2 to 9.3 percentage points]). Similar patterns were seen for severe obesity except that the difference between men living in large MSAs compared with non-MSAs was significant. The age-adjusted prevalence of obesity and severe obesity also varied significantly by age group, race and Hispanic origin, and education level, and these patterns of variation were often different by sex. Between 2001-2004 and 2013-2016, the age-adjusted prevalence of obesity and severe obesity significantly increased among all adults at all urbanization levels. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationally representative survey of adults in the United States, the age-adjusted prevalence of obesity and severe obesity in 2013-2016 varied by level of urbanization, with significantly greater prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults living in nonmetropolitan statistical areas compared with adults living in large metropolitan statistical areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29922829      PMCID: PMC6583043          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.7270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  126 in total

1.  Unraveling common threads in obesity risk among racial/ethnic minority and migrant populations.

Authors:  S K Kumanyika
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.427

2.  Design of the Rural LEAP randomized trial: An evaluation of extended-care programs for weight management delivered via group or individual telephone counseling.

Authors:  Michael G Perri; Aviva H Ariel-Donges; Meena N Shankar; Marian C Limacher; Michael J Daniels; David M Janicke; Kathryn M Ross; Linda B Bobroff; A Daniel Martin; Tiffany A Radcliff; Christie A Befort
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 3.  Considerations for Evaluation of Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-Literate Spanish-Speaking Participants in USDA Food and Nutrition Education Programs.

Authors:  Jinan Banna
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2018-12-26

4.  A Long-Acting PYY3-36 Analog Mediates Robust Anorectic Efficacy with Minimal Emesis in Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Shamina M Rangwala; Katharine D'Aquino; Yue-Mei Zhang; Lindsay Bader; Wilson Edwards; Songmao Zheng; Annette Eckardt; Ann Lacombe; Rebecca Pick; Veronica Moreno; Lijuan Kang; Wenying Jian; Eric Arnoult; Martin Case; Celia Jenkinson; Ellen Chi; Ronald V Swanson; Paul Kievit; Kevin Grove; Mark Macielag; Mark D Erion; Ranabir SinhaRoy; James N Leonard
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 5.  Paternal Nongenetic Intergenerational Transmission of Metabolic Disease Risk.

Authors:  Lei Su; Mary Elizabeth Patti
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Importance of Genetic Studies of Cardiometabolic Disease in Diverse Populations.

Authors:  Lindsay Fernández-Rhodes; Kristin L Young; Adam G Lilly; Laura M Raffield; Heather M Highland; Genevieve L Wojcik; Cary Agler; Shelly-Ann M Love; Samson Okello; Lauren E Petty; Mariaelisa Graff; Jennifer E Below; Kimon Divaris; Kari E North
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Strong Hearts for New York: A multilevel community-based randomized cardiovascular disease risk reduction intervention for rural women.

Authors:  Rebecca A Seguin; Meredith L Graham; Galen Eldridge; Miriam E Nelson; David Strogatz; Sara C Folta; Lynn Paul
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Gender and racial/ethnic differences in physiologic responses in the Stimulant Reduction Intervention using Dosed Exercise Study.

Authors:  T K Killeen; B Wolf; T L Greer; T Carmody; C D Rethorst; M H Trivedi
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Athletes for life: Rationale and methodology of a community- and family-based randomized controlled trial to promote cardiovascular fitness among primarily Latino families.

Authors:  Jacob Szeszulski; Sonia Vega-López; Michael Todd; Frank Ray; Alma Behar; Maria Campbell; Adrian Chavez; Ryan Eckert; Anabell Lorenzo-Quintero; Leopoldo Hartmann Manrique; Noe C Crespo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Relationship of estrogen synthesis capacity in the brain with obesity and self-control in men and women.

Authors:  Anat Biegon; Nelly Alia-Klein; David L Alexoff; Joanna S Fowler; Sung Won Kim; Jean Logan; Deborah Pareto; Rebecca Preston-Campbell; Gene-Jack Wang; Tom Hildebrandt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.