| Literature DB >> 31906366 |
Jinjing Wu1, Jia Chen2, Zhen Li1, Boshen Jiao3, Peter Muennig4.
Abstract
Urbanization is believed to result in a transition towards energy-dense diets, sedentary lifestyles, and a subsequent increase in the burden of hypertension (HTN) and other cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in developing countries. However, the extent to which this occurs is likely dependent on social contexts. We performed multilevel logistic regression models to examine whether the association between incident HTN and the degree to which a community exhibits urban features varied by region (the Northeast, East Coast, Central, and West) within China and period. We used longitudinal data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991-2015) and stratified analyses by sex. Among women, the positive association between medium-to-high urbanicity and HTN onset generally shifted to negative between 1991 and 2015. The high urbanicity was associated with lower odds of developing HTN in the East Coast from the early 1990s. The negative association between high urbanicity and HTN occurrence became statistically significant during 1991-2015 in the Northeastern and Central Regions, while the association remained positive and non-significant in the West. Among men, the relationship between urbanicity and incident HTN was generally non-significant, except for the East Coast in which the negative association between high urbanicity and HTN occurrence became statistically-significant in more recent years. Our findings suggest that, when a subnational region or the society as a whole has become more economically developed, higher urbanicity might turn out to be a protective factor of cardiovascular health. Moreover, improvements made to communities' urban features might be more effective in preventing HTN for women than for men.Entities:
Keywords: China; adults; incident hypertension; urbanicity; urbanization
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906366 PMCID: PMC6982103 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Sample selection process.
Description of the twelve components of the urbanicity scale, China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2015).
| Components | Variables Used to Define Twelve Components of Urbanicity a | Mean (SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Population density | Total population of the community divided by community area | 5.82 (1.40) |
| Traditional markets | Distance to nine types of markets (grains, oil, meat, vegetables, fish, bean curd, milk, fabric and fuel); number of days markets are open | 4.97 (3.53) |
| Modern markets | Number of supermarkets, cafes, internet cafes, indoor restaurants, outdoor fixed and mobile eateries, bakeries, ice cream parlor, fast food restaurant, fruit and vegetable stands and bars within the community boundaries | 4.40 (3.11) |
| Transportation infrastructure | Type of road (dirt/stone/gravel/mixed/paved); distance to bus stop; distance to train stop | 5.40 (2.56) |
| Communications | Availability of a cinema, newspaper, postal service, telephone service; percent of households with a computer; percent of households with a television; percent of households with a cell phone | 5.06 (1.73) |
| Sanitation | Proportion of households with treated water; prevalence of households without excreta present outside the home | 6.04 (3.16) |
| Health infrastructure | Type of health facilities; number of health facilities in or nearby (≤12 km) the community; number of pharmacies in community | 5.53 (2.34) |
| Social services | Availability of a child care center; availability of commercial medical insurance; availability of free medical insurance; availability of insurance for women and children | 1.89 (2.61) |
| Housing | Average number of days a week that electricity is available to the community; percent of community with indoor tap water; percent of community with flush toilets; percent of community that cooks with gas | 5.95 (2.84) |
| Economic activity | Typical daily wage for ordinary male worker; percent of the population engaged in nonagricultural work | 4.90 (3.32) |
| Education | Average education level among adults (>21 years old) | 3.24 (1.51) |
| Diversity | Variation in community education level; variation in community income level | 4.63 (1.29) |
a The description of variables used to define urbanicity was adapted from Jones-Smith and Popkin (2010) [33], with permission of the publisher. Copyright © Elsevier, 2010.
Definitions and distributions of independent variables included in our analyses (N = 41,265 observations), China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2015).
| Variables | Description | Mean (SD)/% |
|---|---|---|
| Urbanicity levels | The degree to which a community exhibited urban features, measured by an urbanicity score | 58.11 (20.33) |
| Low urbanicity | Whether communities’ urbanicity scores were below the median (urbanicity scores < 57.15) | 51.05% |
| Medium-to-high urbanicity | Whether communities’ urbanicity scores were in the third quartile (57.15 ≤ urbanicity scores < 75.09) | 24.59% |
| High urbanicity | Whether communities’ urbanicity scores were in the upper quartile (urbanicity scores ≥ 75.09) | 24.36% |
| Regions | ||
| Northeast | Whether a respondent lived in the Northeast | 17.24% |
| East Coast | Whether a respondent lived in the East Coast | 22.63% |
| Central | Whether a respondent lived in the Central | 32.99% |
| West | Whether a respondent lived in the West | 27.13% |
| Male | Whether a respondent was male | 42.36% |
| Age, year | Number of years since 20th birthday | 24.36 (12.18) |
| Period, year | Survey years centered at 1991 | 10.53 (7.53) |
| Married | Whether a respondent had a spouse | 89.96% |
| Educational attainment | ||
| ≤Primary education | Whether a respondent’s highest educational attainment was primary education or below | 45.61% |
| Lower secondary education | Whether a respondent’s highest educational attainment was lower-secondary education | 31.78% |
| ≥Upper secondary education | Whether a respondent’s highest educational attainment was upper-secondary education | 22.61% |
| Household income per capita, yuan | Household income in 10,000 yuan, inflated to 2015 values | 0.86 (1.40) |
| Non-agricultural | Whether a respondent held a non-agricultural | 38.02% |
| Smoking | Whether a respondent was a current smoker | 30.42% |
| Alcohol drinking | Whether a respondent drank alcohol during the past year | 33.28% |
Estimates of multilevel logistic analyses, complete case analyses, China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2015) a.
| Variables | Female | Male | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Intercept | −6.39 **** | −6.61 **** | −6.74 *** | −5.39 *** | −5.43 *** | −5.47 *** |
| (0.24) | (0.25) | (0.26) | (0.19) | (0.20) | (0.21) | |
| Age | 0.11 *** | 0.11 *** | 0.11 *** | 0.06 *** | 0.06 *** | 0.06 *** |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Age2 | −0.00 *** | −0.00 *** | −0.001 *** | −0.00 * | −0.00 * | −0.00 * |
| (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | |
| Northeast | 0.73 *** | 0.96 *** | 0.95 *** | 0.55 *** | 0.59 *** | 0.59 *** |
| (0.11) | (0.15) | (0.15) | (0.11) | (0.15) | (0.15) | |
| East Coast | 0.53 *** | 0.92 *** | 0.93 *** | 0.66 *** | 0.83 *** | 0.84 *** |
| (0.11) | (0.15) | (0.15) | (0.11) | (0.15) | (0.15) | |
| Central | 0.47 *** | 0.67 *** | 0.68 *** | 0.45 *** | 0.44 ** | 0.44 *** |
| (0.10) | (0.13) | (0.13) | (0.10) | (0.13) | (0.13) | |
| Medium-to-high urbanicity | 0.07 | 0.33 * | 0.76 *** | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.31 |
| (0.08) | (0.14) | (0.19) | (0.08) | (0.15) | (0.19) | |
| High urbanicty level | −0.37 *** | 0.10 | 0.11 | −0.16 | −0.18 | −0.12 |
| (0.10) | (0.17) | (0.25) | (0.10) | (0.18) | (0.25) | |
| Period | 0.43 *** | 0.43 *** | 0.45 *** | 0.47 *** | 0.47 *** | 0.47 *** |
| (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | |
| Period2 | −0.04 *** | −0.04 *** | −0.04 *** | −0.04 *** | −0.04 *** | −0.04 *** |
| (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | |
| Period3 | 0.00 *** | 0.00 *** | 0.001 *** | 0.00 *** | 0.00 *** | 0.00 *** |
| (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | |
| Medium-to-high × Northeast | −0.18 | −0.14 | −0.13 | −0.11 | ||
| High × Northeast | (0.21) | (0.21) | (0.22) | (0.22) | ||
| −0.63 ** | −0.62 ** | −0.01 | −0.01 | |||
| (0.23) | (0.23) | (0.24) | (0.24) | |||
| Medium-to-high × East Coast | −0.55 ** | −0.58 ** | −0.28 | −0.29 | ||
| High × East Coast | (0.19) | (0.19) | (0.20) | (0.20) | ||
| −0.81 *** | −0.84 *** | −0.29 | −0.30 | |||
| (0.22) | (0.22) | (0.22) | (0.22) | |||
| Medium-to-high × Central | −0.27 | −0.28 | −0.18 | −0.18 | ||
| (0.18) | (0.18) | (0.19) | (0.19) | |||
| High × Central | −0.47 * | −0.51 * | 0.23 | 0.22 | ||
| (0.21) | (0.21) | (0.21) | (0.21) | |||
| Medium-to-high × Period | −0.03 *** | −0.01 | ||||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||||
| High × Period | 0.002 | −0.00 | ||||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||||
| Household income per capita | −0.02 | −0.02 | −0.02 | −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.01 |
| Lower secondary education | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) |
| −0.09 | −0.09 | −0.09 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| (0.07) | (0.07) | (0.07) | (0.07) | (0.07) | (0.07) | |
| Upper secondary education | −0.22 * | −0.22 * | −0.22 * | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| (0.09) | (0.09) | (0.09) | (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | |
| Non-agricultural | 0.03 | 0.05 | −0.02 | 0.17 * | 0.19 * | 0.17 * |
| (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | |
| Married | −0.09 | −0.09 | −0.09 | −0.07 | −0.07 | −0.07 |
| (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.09) | (0.09) | (0.09) | |
| Current smoker | −0.21 | −0.22 | −0.22 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| (0.12) | (0.12) | (0.12) | (0.05) | (0.05) | (0.05) | |
| Drinking alcohol | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.14 ** | 0.14 ** | 0.14 ** |
| (0.09) | (0.09) | (0.09) | (0.05) | (0.05) | (0.05) | |
| Random effects | S.D. | S.D. | S.D. | S.D. | S.D. | S.D. |
| Community level: intercept | 0.14 *** | 0.13 *** | 0.12 *** | 0.14 *** | 0.14 *** | 0.14 *** |
| (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | |
| Individual level: intercept | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| (0.13) | (0.12) | (0.12) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | |
| AIC | 12237.97 | 12232.66 | 12222.98 | 11485.42 | 11487.49 | 11490.54 |
| −2 Log Likelihood | −6098.99 | −6090.33 | −6083.49 | −5723.71 | −5718.74 | −5718.27 |
| Number of observations | 23,787 | 23,787 | 23,787 | 17,478 | 17,478 | 17,478 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. AIC, Aikake Information Criterion. a In sensitivity analyses, we rebuilt models based on multiply imputed datasets. We presented estimates in Table S3 of Supplementary Materials. We found that the findings of the association between urbanicity and incident HTN remained unchanged after multiple imputations, indicating that our main results were robust.
Figure 2Odds ratio of getting hypertension during the follow-up surveys (the medium-to-high urbanicity, the high urbanicity, versus the low urbanicity) among women (a) and men (b) by region and survey year.
Figure A1Predicted probabilities of getting hypertension and 95% confidence interval during 1991–2015 among women (a) and men (b) by levels of urbanicity, region, and survey year.