| Literature DB >> 35204561 |
Mirela Gherghe1,2, Alexandra Maria Lazar2, Mario-Demian Mutuleanu1,2, Adina Elena Stanciu3, Sorina Martin4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic review of the literature to provide an overview of the application of PET-based radiomics of [18F]FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas and to discuss the additional value of PET volumetric parameters and radiomic features over clinical data.Entities:
Keywords: [18F]FDG PET/CT; radiomics; thyroid incidentaloma; volumetric parameters
Year: 2022 PMID: 35204561 PMCID: PMC8870948 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1Schematic representation of the process of selection of literature data including in this qualitative review.
Mean and standard deviation for PET-based volumetric parameters in the malignant group.
| Reference | Malignancy Rate |
Mean SUVmax |
Mean MTV |
Mean TLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim B.H. et al. [ | 20.9% | 8.27 ± 11.09 (AUC: 0.601) | 0.27 ± 0.39 (AUC: 0.613) | NA |
| Kim B.H. et al. [ | 21.7% | 10.52 ± 15.28 (AUC: 0.716) | 4.18 ± 7.68 (AUC: 0.839) | 49.33 ± 599.39 (AUC: 0.815) |
| Kim S.J. et al. [ | NA | 5.96 ± 2.61 (AUC: 0.586) | 5.76 ± 2.0 (AUC: 0.566) | 16.01 ± 6.9 (AUC: 0.562) |
| Shi et al. [ | 64.6% | 11.30 ± 8.40 (AUC: 0.866) | 2.7 ± 4.0 (AUC: 0.872) | 30.0 ± 75.5 (AUC: 0.895) |
| Shi et al. [ | 59.8% | 11.90 ± 8.90 (AUC: 0.872) | 3.06 ± 4.30 (AUC: 0.895) | 35.2 ± 83.0 (AUC: 0.916) |
| Thuillier et al. [ | NA | 9.27 ± 3.28 (AUC: 0.550) | 5.46 ± 12.18 (AUC: 0.530) | 22.66 ± 38.41 (AUC: 0.610) |
| Erdogan et al. [ | 9.8% | 5.33 ± 2.93 (AUC: 0.827) | 5.76 ± 9.78 (AUC: 0.668) | 21.14 ± 37.51 (AUC: 0.726) |
| Sollini et al. [ | 36% | 9 ± 8.70 (AUC: 0.600) | 27 ± 94.5 (AUC: 0.660) | 309.5 ± 1881.7 (AUC: 0.660) |
| Ceriani et al. [ | 28% | 10.91 ± 2.04 (AUC: 0.652) | 12.60 ± 7.46 (AUC: 0.733) | 45.33 ± 13.84 (AUC: 0.756) |
| Aksu et al. [ | 44.7% | 16.11 ± 38.99 (AUC: 0.758) | NA | 107.59 ± 213.16 (AUC: 0.822) |
Abbreviations: SUV—standardized uptake value; MTV—Metabolic Tumour Volume; TLG—Total Lesion Glycolysis; SD—Standard Deviation; NA—not applicable.
Volumetric parameters pooled values obtained in our sub-analysis.
| PET/CT Parameter | Mean SUVmax | Mean MTV | Mean TLG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obtained Pooled Value | 9.85 ± 3.09 | 7.42 ± 8.08 | 70.82 ± 93.62 |
Studies that used radiomics to differentiate malignant from benign thyroid incidentalomas.
| Reference | No. Patients/Lesions | ROI Segmentation | Software | No. Radiomics Features | Model Construction | Components of Predictive Model | Validation | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sollini et al. [ | 50 | Fixed threshold | LifeX package | 43 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Ceriani et al. [ | 107 nodules (104 patients) | Fixed threshold | PyRadiomics Version 2.2.0 | 107 | Univariate Logistic Regression of Dichotomized Data | SUVmax | 1000-resampled bootstrapping CV | 0.830 |
| Aksu et al. [ | 60 (42 train set, 18 test set) | Fixed threshold | LifeX package | 46 | RF | SUVmax | Tenfold CV | 0.849 |
| Giovanella et al. [ | 78 | Fixed threshold algorithm | PyRadiomics Version 2.2.0 | 107 | LASSO (with tenfold CV) | Shape_Sphericity | 1000-resampled bootstrapping CV | 0.733 |
Abbreviations: ROI—region of interest; AUC—area under curve; SUV—standardized uptake value; TLG—total lesion glycolysis; NA—not applicable; CV—cross-validation; RF—random forest; SVM—support vector machine; DT—decision tree; NB—naïve bayes; LASSO—least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; GLRLM—grey-level run length matrix; GLCM—grey-level co-occurrence matrix; EV—external validation.
Figure 2Completion rate of each radiomics quality score characteristic for the 4 studies included in this review.