| Literature DB >> 35203842 |
Vanessa Silva1,2,3,4, Ana Filipa Lopes5, Vanessa Soeiro6, Manuela Caniça7,8, Vera Manageiro7,8, José Eduardo Pereira1,9, Luís Maltez1,9, José Luis Capelo10,11, Gilberto Igrejas2,3,4, Patrícia Poeta1,4,9.
Abstract
Owls are nocturnal predators that inhabit urbanized and farmlands. They are in direct contact with other animals, both livestock and small wild rodents that they mostly feed on. Staphylococci can be both commensal and pathogenic bacteria that are widespread across the various ecological niches. We aimed to isolate staphylococci from owls and to characterize their antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors and genetic lineages. Swab samples were collected from the throat and cloaca of 114 owls admitted to two rehabilitation centers in Portugal. The identification of staphylococci species was performed by MALDI-TOF. Staphylococci antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes were investigated by means of the disk diffusion method and PCR. Staphylococcus aureus isolates were characterized by MLST, agr and spa-typing. Of the tested animals, 66 isolates were recovered, including 10 different species of staphylococci, of which 25 were coagulase-positive (CoPS) and 41 were coagulase-negative (CoNS). Twenty-three S. aureus were isolated, of which one mecC-MRSA was identified. The isolates were mainly resistant to penicillin, aminoglycosides, clindamycin and tetracycline. mecC-MRSA belonged to ST1245 and spa-type t843 and the remaining S. aureus were ascribed to 12 STs and 15 spa types. A high diversity of clonal lineages was identified among the S. aureus isolated from wild owls. Owls feed mainly on small rodents often exposed to waste and anthropogenic sources, which may explain the moderate prevalence of S. aureus in these animals.Entities:
Keywords: CoNS; MRSA; ST1245-t843; Staphylococcus aureus; antimicrobial resistance; mecC
Year: 2022 PMID: 35203842 PMCID: PMC8868206 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11020240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
The distribution of CoNS and CoPS among the four owl species.
| Owl Species | Number of Samples | Number of CoPS | Number of CoNS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | 7 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1 | 4 | |
| 25 | 8 | 8 | |
| 43 | 9 | 20 | |
| Total | 114 | 25 | 41 |
Genetic characterization and molecular typing of MRSA and MSSA isolates recovered from wild owls.
| Isolate | Owl Species | Antimicrobial Resistance | Virulence Factors | Molecular Typing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenotype | Genotype | IEC Type | Other Genes | ST (CC) |
|
| ||
| VS2960 |
| PEN, FOX | 1245 (130) | t843 | III | |||
| VS2961 |
| PEN, FD | 49 (49) | t208 | II | |||
| VS2962 |
| PEN | 49 (49) | t208 | II | |||
| VS2963 |
| Susceptible | 49 (49) | t208 | II | |||
| VS2964 |
| Susceptible | 49 (49) | t9811 | II | |||
| VS2965 |
| Susceptible | 49 (49) | t20169 | II | |||
| VS2966 |
| Susceptible | 49 (49) | t208 | II | |||
| VS2967 |
| Susceptible | E |
| 49 (49) | t208 | II | |
| VS2968 |
| PEN | B |
| 8 (8) | t121 | I | |
| VS2969 |
| PEN, CIP | B |
| 8 (8) | t121 | I | |
| VS2970 |
| PEN, FD | B |
| 8 (8) | t121 | I | |
| VS2971 |
| Susceptible | 2328 (133) | t3750 | III | |||
| VS2972 |
| PEN, FD | 2328 (133) | t3750 | III | |||
| VS2973 |
| PEN, TET, FD | 2766 (121) | t12364 | IV | |||
| VS2974 |
| ERY | B |
| 718 | t11333 | II | |
| VS2975 |
| PEN | 30 (30) | t9413 | III | |||
| VS2976 |
| TET |
| 692 | t1422 | I | ||
| VS2977 |
| Susceptible | 1956 (121) | t20223 | IV | |||
| VS2978 |
| PEN, CIP, CD, FD | 130 (130) | t843 | III | |||
| VS2979 |
| Susceptible | 1640 | t9853 | IV | |||
| VS2980 |
| Susceptible | 6 (5) | t16615 | I | |||
| VS2981 |
| Susceptible | 7184 | t2247 | I | |||
| VS2982 |
| Susceptible | E |
| 7352 | t2143 | I | |
PEN: penicillin; FOX: cefoxitin; FD: fusidic acid; CIP: ciprofloxacin; TET: tetracycline; ERY: erythromycin; CD: clindamycin; IEC: Immune Evasion Cluster; ST: sequence type; CC: clonal complex.
Owl and staphylococci species identification and resistance genes identified.
| Isolate | Staphylococci Species | Owl Species | Antimicrobial Resistance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenotype | Genotype | |||
| VS2985 |
|
| PEN, FD | |
| VS2986 |
|
| PEN, ERY, FD | |
| VS2987 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS2988 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS2989 |
|
| PEN | |
| VS2990 |
|
| PEN | |
| VS2991 |
|
| PEN, CD, TET, FD | |
| VS2992 |
|
| PEN, CD, FD | |
| VS2993 |
|
| PEN, FOX, CD | |
| VS2994 |
|
| PEN | |
| VS2995 |
|
| PEN, CD, FD | |
| VS2996 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS2997 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS2998 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS2999 |
|
| PEN, FD | |
| VS3000 |
|
| PEN, FOX, CD, FD | |
| VS3001 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS3002 |
|
| PEN | |
| VS3003 |
|
| PEN, FD | |
| VS3004 |
|
| PEN, FOX, CD, TET, FD | |
| VS3005 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS3006 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS3007 |
|
| CD | |
| VS3008 |
|
| PEN, CD, TET, FD | |
| VS3009 |
|
| PEN, CD, TET | |
| VS3010 |
|
| CD, TET | |
| VS3011 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS3012 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS3013 |
|
| TET | |
| VS3014 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS3015 |
|
| PEN, CD, FD | |
| VS3016 |
|
| FD | |
| VS3017 |
|
| ||
| VS3018 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS3019 |
|
| PEN, FD | |
| VS3020 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS3021 |
|
| PEN, FOX, CIP, ERY, CD, TET, SXT | |
| VS3022 |
|
| Susceptible | |
| VS3023 |
|
| PEN, FOX, ERY, CD, TET, C, FD | |
| VS3024 |
|
| ERY | |
| VS3025 |
|
| PEN | |
C: chloramphenicol; CD: clindamycin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; ERY: erythromycin; FD, fusidic acid; FOX: cefoxitin; PEN: penicillin; SXT: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; TET: tetracycline.
Figure 1Minimum spanning tree, based on MLST of 23 S. aureus isolated from wild owls. The minimum spanning tree graph (MST) was created with PHYLOViZ using the goeBURST algorithm [71]. The dominant STs are represented by the circles with larger diameters. Each color represents one isolate. Numbers on lines indicate locus variants between adjacent nodes.