| Literature DB >> 35203163 |
Youssef A Attia1, Hanan Al-Khalaifah2, Hatem S Abd El-Hamid3, Mohammed A Al-Harthi1, Salem R Alyileili4, Ali A El-Shafey5.
Abstract
Probiotics, such as active yeasts, are widely used to enhance poultry production and reduce feeding costs. This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant and immune responses of broilers to different concentrations of active Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) when supplemented to two types of diets. A total of 216 1-day-old Arbor Acres unsexed chicks were used in a factorial design, involving two feeds (regular- versus low-density diet) and three concentrations of SC (0%, 0.02% and 0.04%). The results revealed that the low-density diet reduced the body weight and production index of broilers. The addition of SC improved the production index more than the control diet. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and eosinophils were significantly higher in response to the regular-density diet than the low-density diet; however, phagocytic activity (PA), lymphocyte and lysozyme activity (LYS) were lower. Saccharomyces cerevisiae reduced ALT, AST, malondialdehyde (MAD) and TAC more than the standard set, but improved packed cell volume (PCV), hemoglobin (Hgb), red blood cells (RBCs), lymphocytes, monocytes, heterophils, phagocytic index (PI) and the immune response to Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and avian influenza (AI). In conclusion, supplementation of a regular- or low-density diet with SC at a concentration of 0.02% or 0.04% improved the antioxidant parameters, immune status and production index of broilers against stress and infectious agents.Entities:
Keywords: active yeast; antioxidant status; broilers; immune response; nutrient density
Year: 2022 PMID: 35203163 PMCID: PMC8868459 DOI: 10.3390/ani12040453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Basal chemical composition of the experimental diets.
| Ingredients (%) | Regular-Density Diet | Low-Density Diet | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | Grower | Finisher | Starter | Grower | Finisher | |
| Maize | 51.27 | 52.02 | 55.85 | 46.01 | 46.61 | 50.40 |
| Rye | 0 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 4.48 | 6.2 |
| Wheat bran | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Soybean meal (44% CP) | 32.8 | 24.4 | 28.0 | 29.3 | 21.9 | 25.0 |
| Vegetable oil | 2.25 | 2.0 | 5.3 | 2.01 | 1.79 | 4.7 |
| Full-fat soybean meal | 10 | 13 | 1.6 | 9 | 11.64 | 1.42 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Limestone | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.15 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.15 |
| L-Lysine | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.2 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.30 |
| Vit + min premix 1 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| NaCl | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Washed building sand | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Calculated and deterimed analyses | ||||||
| Metabolizable Energy (kcal/kg) 2 | 3038 | 3100 | 3196 | 2735 | 2790 | 2876 |
| Crude Protein (%) 3 | 22.8 | 21.2 | 18.5 | 20.5 | 19.1 | 16.7 |
| Lysine (%) 2 | 1.33 | 1.23 | 1.04 | 1.20 | 1.11 | 0.94 |
| Methionine (%) 2 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.43 |
| Meth + cysteine (%) 2 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.70 |
| Calcium (%) 2 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| Av. P (%) 2 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.414 | 0.369 | 0.369 |
| Crude fat (%) 3 | 6.09 | 6.45 | 6.8 | 5.48 | 5.81 | 6.12 |
| Crude fibre (%) 3 | 3.55 | 4.48 | 4.75 | 3.20 | 4.03 | 4.28 |
| Ash (%) 3 | 5.22 | 5.48 | 5.71 | 4.70 | 4.93 | 5.14 |
1 Vit + Min mix. contains the following nutrients. Values are per kilogram of the diet: Vit. A, 12,000 IU; Vit. E (dl-α-tocopheryl acetate), 20 mg; menadione, 2.3 mg; Vit. D3, 2200 ICU; riboflavin, 5.5 mg; calcium pantothenate, 12 mg; nicotinic acid, 50 mg; Choline, 250 mg; Vit. B12, 10 μg; Vit. B6, 3 mg; thiamine 3 mg; folic acid, 1 mg; d-biotin, 0.05 mg; Trace minerals (mg/kg of diet): Mn, 80; Zn, 60; Fe, 35; Cu, 8; Selenium, 0.1 mg, 2 Calculated analyses, 3 Determined analyses.
Impact of different concentrations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on body weight, survival rate, European Production Efficiency Index and blood hematological parameters of broilers fed regular- or low-density diets from days 1 to 38 of age.
| Treatment | Body Weight at 38 Days of Age, g | Survival Rate, % | European Production Efficiency Index | PCV, % | Hemoglobin, g/dL | RBC, 106/uL | MCV, fL | MCH, pg | MCHC, g/dL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of diet | ||||||||||
| Regular density | 2099 a | 100 | 314 a | 30.4 | 9.91 | 1.65 | 186 | 60.6 | 32.7 | |
| Low density | 2004 b | 100 | 297 b | 30.0 | 10.0 | 1.72 | 177 | 58.7 | 33.3 | |
| Effect of yeast concentration | ||||||||||
| Control | 1865 c | 100 | 281 b | 28.3 b | 9.43 b | 1.60 b | 180 | 59.7 | 33.2 | |
| 0.02% | 2106 b | 100 | 318 a | 31.6 a | 10.5 a | 1.76 a | 182 | 60.8 | 33.5 | |
| 0.04% | 2183 a | 100 | 318 a | 30.7 a | 9.87 b | 1.70 ab | 182 | 58.5 | 32.2 | |
| Interaction between diet type and yeast concentration | ||||||||||
| Regular density | Control | 1946 | 100 | 288 | 18.7 b | 8.75 b | 1.58 | 172 b,c | 55.7 b,c | 32.4 |
| 0.02% | 2171 | 100 | 321 | 32.0 a | 10.6 a | 1.75 | 185 a,b,c | 61.6 a,b | 33.4 | |
| 0.04% | 2179 | 100 | 334 | 32.3 a | 10.3 a | 1.62 | 202 a | 64.5 a | 32.2 | |
| Low density | Control | 1784 | 100 | 274 | 29.7 a | 10.1 a | 1.61 | 188 a,b | 63.8 a,b | 34.0 |
| 0.02% | 2041 | 100 | 315 | 31.3 a | 10.5 a | 1.77 | 179 a,b,c | 60.0 a,b | 33.5 | |
| 0.04% | 2187 | 100 | 303 | 29.1 a | 9.37 b | 1.78 | 163 c | 52.4 c | 32.3 | |
| SEM | 41.30 | ND | 9.67 | 0.955 | 0.316 | 0.058 | 9.99 | 3.09 | 1.02 | |
| Diet type | 0.0008 | ND | 0.0408 | 0.6336 | 0.7485 | 0.1473 | 0.256 | 0.466 | 0.458 | |
| Yeast | 0.0001 | ND | 0.0006 | 0.0040 | 0.0038 | 0.0273 | 0.966 | 0.753 | 0.442 | |
| Interaction | 0.1182 | ND | 0.4298 | 0.0121 | 0.0021 | 0.4088 | 0.029 | 0.009 | 0.715 | |
a,b,c Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) post hoc tests. MCV = Mean corpuscular volume; MCH = Mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC = Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; Number of observations was 6 replicates per interaction cell. ND = Not done.
Impact of different concentrations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on liver enzymes and malondialdehyde (MDA) of broilers fed regular- and low-density diets from days 1 to 38 of age.
| Treatment | AST (U/L) | ALT (U/L) | AST/ALT Ratio | Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) | MDA.m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of diet | ||||||
| Regular density | 64.7 a | 56.4 a | 1.14 | 11.4 | 1.44 | |
| Low density | 63.7 b | 55.1 b | 1.15 | 11.6 | 1.45 | |
| Effect of yeast concentration | ||||||
| Control | 66.0 a | 57.8 a | 1.14 | 11.5 | 1.57 a | |
| 0.02% | 63.43 b | 54.9 b | 1.15 | 11.2 | 1.32 c | |
| 0.04% | 63.2 b | 54.6 b | 1.15 | 11.8 | 1.45 b | |
| Interaction between diet and yeast concentration | ||||||
| Regular density | Control | 65.5 a,b | 57.1 a,b | 1.14 | 11.6 | 1.41 b |
| 0.02% | 64.2 b | 56.1 b | 1.14 | 11.2 | 1.43 b | |
| 0.04% | 64.5 b | 56.1 b | 1.14 | 11.3 | 1.47 b | |
| Low density | Control | 66.6 a | 58.6 a | 1.13 | 11.3 | 1.73 a |
| 0.02% | 62.6 c | 53.7 c | 1.16 | 11.2 | 1.21 c | |
| 0.04% | 62.0 c | 53.1 c | 1.16 | 12.2 | 1.42 b | |
| SEM | 0.537 | 0.701 | 0.015 | 0.587 | 0.058 | |
| Diet | 0.0283 | 0.0299 | 0.4385 | 0.6668 | 0.7284 | |
| Yeast concentration | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.5854 | 0.6351 | 0.0005 | |
| Interaction | 0.0046 | 0.0052 | 0.5946 | 0.6077 | 0.0001 | |
a,b,c Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) post hoc test. ALT = Alanine aminotransferase; AST = Aspartate aminotransferase; AST/ALT = Aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio; MAD = Malondialdehyde. Number of observations was 6 per interaction cell.
Impact of different concentrations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the biochemical constituents of blood serum of broilers fed regular- and low-density diets from days 1 to 38 of age.
| Treatment | Serum Biochemical Constituents (mg/dL) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Protein, g/dL | Albumin, g/dL | Globulin, g/dL | α -Gloulin, g/dL | β -Globulin, g/dL | γ -Globulin, g/dL | GAR | ||
| Effect of diet | ||||||||
| Regular density | 5.00 | 2.70 | 2.24 | 0.912 | 0.730 | 0.595 a | 0.846 | |
| Low density | 4.80 | 2.73 | 2.11 | 0.958 | 0.720 | 0.437 b | 0.784 | |
| Effect of yeast concentration | ||||||||
| Control | 4.73 b | 2.64 | 2.09 | 0.837 | 0.656 b | 0.600 | 0.828 | |
| 0.02% | 5.01 a | 2.70 | 2.17 | 0.956 | 0.768 a | 0.450 | 0.792 | |
| 0.04% | 5.00 a | 2.81 | 2.26 | 1.01 | 0.756 a | 0.500 | 0.824 | |
| Interaction between diet and yeast concentration | ||||||||
| Regular density | Control | 4.78 | 2.63 | 2.15 | 0.837 | 0.637 | 0.675 | 0.870 |
| 0.02% | 4.86 | 2.75 | 2.26 | 0.962 | 0.800 | 0.500 | 0.820 | |
| 0.04% | 5.10 | 2.72 | 2.31 | 0.837 | 0.762 | 0.612 | 0.846 | |
| Low density | Control | 4.68 | 2.65 | 2.03 | 0.837 | 0.675 | 0.525 | 0.786 |
| 0.02% | 4.86 | 2.65 | 2.08 | 0.950 | 0.737 | 0.400 | 0.763 | |
| 0.04% | 5.02 | 2.91 | 2.22 | 1.087 | 0.750 | 0.387 | 0.802 | |
| SEM | 0.137 | 0.153 | 0.113 | 0.072 | 0.044 | 0.067 | 0.075 | |
| Diet | 0.191 | 0.792 | 0.1845 | 0.4459 | 0.7356 | 0.0066 | 0.3243 | |
| Yeast | 0.0312 | 0.5149 | 0.3136 | 0.0612 | 0.0323 | 0.0908 | 0.8728 | |
| Interaction | 0.8182 | 0.6448 | 0.9241 | 0.4702 | 0.5448 | 0.6516 | 0.9641 | |
a,b Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) post hoc tests. GAR = Globulin to albumin ratio. Number of observations was 6 chicks per interaction cell.
Impact of different concentrations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on white blood cells (WBC) and its subpopulations in broilers fed regular- and low-density diets from 1 to 38 days of age.
| Treatment | WBCs, 106/mm3 | Lymphocytes, % | Monocytes, % | Basophils, % | Eosinophils, % | Heterophils, % | H/L Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of diet | ||||||||
| Regular density | 22.8 | 41.1 b | 10.5 | 0.583 | 10.0 a | 23.4 | 0.572 | |
| Low density | 22.7 | 42.4 a | 10.6 | 0.583 | 9.29 b | 23.7 | 0.564 | |
| Effect of yeast concentration | ||||||||
| Control | 22.8 | 40.0 b | 9.68 b | 0.562 | 9.87 | 23.1 b | 0.583 a | |
| 0.02% | 23.1 | 42.9 a | 11.3 a | 0.625 | 9.56 | 23.4 b | 0.550 b | |
| 0.04% | 22.4 | 42.4 a | 10.8 a | 0.562 | 9.56 | 24.1 a | 0.571 a,b | |
| Interaction between diet and yeast concentration | ||||||||
| Regular density | Control | 21.7 b | 39.7 | 9.25 | 0.625 | 10.6 | 23.0 | 0.585 a |
| 0.02% | 23.2 a | 41.7 | 11.5 | 0.750 | 9.87 | 23.7 | 0.571 a | |
| 0.04% | 23.5 a | 42.0 | 11.0 | 0.375 | 9.62 | 23.5 | 0.560 a | |
| Low density | Control | 23.8 a | 40.3 | 10.1 | 0.500 | 9.12 | 23.2 | 0.581 a |
| 0.02% | 23.0 a | 44.1 | 11.1 | 0.500 | 9.25 | 23.1 | 0.528 b | |
| 0.04% | 21.3 b | 42.8 | 10.6 | 0.750 | 9.50 | 24.8 | 0.583 a | |
| SEM | 0.450 | 0.543 | 0.379 | 0.189 | 0.300 | 0.362 | 0.130 | |
| Diet | 0.8219 | 0.0059 | 0.8939 | 1.0000 | 0.0041 | 0.2689 | 0.4844 | |
| Yeast | 0.3213 | 0.0001 | 0.0004 | 0.9304 | 0.4936 | 0.0174 | 0.0453 | |
| Interaction | 0.0001 | 0.2324 | 0.1783 | 0.2321 | 0.0815 | 0.3219 | 0.0485 | |
a,b Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) post hoc tests. H/L = Heterophil to lymphocyte ratio. Number of observations was 6 per interaction cell.
Impact of different concentrations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on immune organs and HI titer (log2) in response to avian influenza and Newcastle disease virus in 38-day-old broilers fed either a regular- or low-density diet from days 1 to 38 of age.
| Treatment | Spleen, % | Thymus, % | Bursa of Fabricius, % | HI2, Log2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDV | AI | |||||
| Effect of diet | ||||||
| Regular density | 0.135 | 0.466 b | 0.201 | 3.36 | 2.83 | |
| Low density | 0.148 | 0.516 a | 0.223 | 3.43 | 2.04 | |
| Effect of yeast concentration | ||||||
| Control | 0.110 b | 0.425 c | 0.167 c | 1.12 c | 0.125 c | |
| 0.02% | 0.153 a | 0.490 b | 0.213 b | 3.54 b | 2.69 b | |
| 0.04% | 0.161 a | 0.558 a | 0.256 a | 5.58 a | 4.50 a | |
| Interaction between diet and yeast concentration | ||||||
| Regular density | Control | 0.112 c | 0.366 c | 0.162 b | 1.17 d | 0.250 |
| 0.02% | 0.136 b | 0.486 b | 0.189 b | 3.92 c | 3.37 | |
| 0.04% | 0.155 a,b | 0.545 a,b | 0.252 a | 5.00 b | 4.87 | |
| Low density | Control | 0.108 c | 0.484 b | 0.171 b | 1.08 d | 0.00 |
| 0.02% | 0.169 a | 0.495 b | 0.238 a | 3.17 c | 2.00 | |
| 0.04% | 0.167 a | 0.570 a | 0.260 a | 6.17 a | 4.12 | |
| SEM | 0.326 | 0.195 | 0.014 | 0.372 | 0.605 | |
| Diet | 0.0669 | 0.0214 | 0.0606 | 0.7161 | 0.1174 | |
| Yeast | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | |
| Interaction | 0.1060 | 0.0828 | 0.2739 | 0.0393 | 0.6515 | |
a,b,c,d Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) post hoc tests. HI = Hemagglutination inhibition test; NDV = Newcastle disease virus; I = Influenza antigen. Number of observations was 6 chicks per interaction cell.
Impact of different concentrations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on immune indices of broilers fed a regular- or low-density diet from 1 to 38 days of age.
| Treatment | LTT,% | BACT,% | LYS,% | TAC, | PI | PA,% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of diet | |||||||
| Regular density | 24.2 | 42.1 | 0.082 b | 429 a | 1.58 | 17.4 b | |
| Low density | 25.8 | 43.2 | 0.098 a | 419 b | 1.53 | 18.8 a | |
| SEM | 0.599 | 0.527 | 0.004 | 2.19 | 0.025 | 0.375 | |
| Effect of yeast concentration | |||||||
| Control | 24.8 | 43.9 | 0.081 | 436 a | 1.46 b | 17.5 | |
| 0.02% | 25.1 | 41.8 | 0.095 | 420 b | 1.61 a | 18.3 | |
| 0.04% | 25.0 | 42.3 | 0.095 | 416 b | 1.60 a | 18.6 | |
| SEM | 0.733 | 0.645 | 0.005 | 2.68 | 0.031 | 0.460 | |
| Interaction between diet and yeast concentration | |||||||
| Regular density | Control | 23.6 | 43.2 | 0.071 | 443 | 1.45 | 16.0 |
| 0.02% | 24.3 | 41.2 | 0.082 | 425 | 1.61 | 17.8 | |
| 0.04% | 24.7 | 42.0 | 0.092 | 419 | 1.68 | 18.5 | |
| Low density | Control | 26.1 | 44.6 | 0.091 | 430 | 1.47 | 19.0 |
| 0.02% | 26.0 | 42.5 | 0.107 | 414 | 1.61 | 18.8 | |
| 0.04% | 25.3 | 42.7 | 0.097 | 413 | 1.52 | 18.7 | |
| SEM | 1.03 | 0.913 | 0.007 | 3.39 | 0.044 | 0.650 | |
| Diet | 0.0693 | 0.1394 | 0.0128 | 0.0027 | 0.2240 | 0.0111 | |
| Yeast | 0.9552 | 0.0746 | 0.1410 | 0.0001 | 0.0026 | 0.2054 | |
| Interaction | 0.6676 | 0.9366 | 0.4206 | 0.6813 | 0.0942 | 0.1052 | |
a,b Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) post hoc tests. LTT = Lymphocyte transformation test; BACT = Bactericidal activity; LYS = Lysozyme activity; TAC = Total antioxidant capacity; PI = Phagocytic index; PA = Phagocytic activity. Number of observations was 6 per interaction cell.
Impact of different concentrations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the survival rate of broiler chickens between 38 and 48 days of age that were fed a regular- or low-density diet and infected with HPAIV H5N1 at 38 days of age.
| Treatment | Survival Rate after Infection of Influenza at 38 of Age,% | |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of diet | ||
| Regular density | 64.8 | |
| Low density | 59.2 | |
| Effect of yeast concentration | ||
| Control | 56.0 b | |
| 0.02% | 56.0 b | |
| 0.04% | 71.0 a | |
| Effect of age | ||
| 39 d (1) challenge | 100 a | |
| 40 d (2) challenge | 100 a | |
| 41 d (3) challenge | 70.0 b | |
| 42 d (4) challenge | 56.6 b,c | |
| 43 d (5) challenge | 50.0 b,c | |
| 44 d (6) challenge | 50.0 b,c | |
| 45 d (7) challenge | 50.0 b,c | |
| 46 d (8) challenge | 45.0 b,c | |
| 47 d (9) challenge | 40.0 c | |
| 48 d (10) challenge | 30.0 c | |
| Interaction between diet and yeast concentration | ||
| Regular density | Control | 56.0 |
| 0.02% | 64.0 | |
| 0.04% | 70.0 | |
| Low density | Control | 56.0 |
| 0.02% | 48.0 | |
| 0.04% | 72.0 | |
| SEM | 6.57 | |
| Diet | 0.2947 | |
| Yeast | 0.0001 | |
| Interaction | 0.1380 | |
a,b,c Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) test. Number of observations was 6 broilers of 38-day-old per interaction cell.
Impact of different concentrations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the morphology of the intestine, bursa of Fabricius and follicular cortical:medullary ratio of the thymus in 38-day-old broilers fed regular- or low-density diet.
| Treatment | Length of Intestinal Villi, µm | L. Axis of Large Follicle of Bursa of Fabricius, µm | Follicular Cortical: Medullary Ratio of the Thymus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of diet | ||||
| Regular density | 239 | 166 | 1:3 | |
| Low density | 248 | 177 | 1:3 | |
| Effect of yeast concentration | ||||
| Control | 215 b | 157 b | 1:3 | |
| 0.02% | 227 b | 164 b | 1.3 | |
| 0.04% | 289 a | 193 a | 1:3 | |
| Interaction between diet and yeast concentration | ||||
| Regular density | Control | 211 | 157 | 1:3 |
| 0.02% | 226 | 159 | 1:3 | |
| 0.04% | 279 | 181 | 1:3 | |
| Low density | Control | 219 | 157 | 1:3 |
| 0.02% | 227 | 170 | 1:3 | |
| 0.04% | 298 | 206 | 1:3 | |
| SEM | 9.61 | 8.07 | ND | |
| Diet | 0.2389 | 0.0851 | ND | |
| Yeast | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | ND | |
| Interaction | 0.6707 | 0.2832 | ND | |
a,b Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) post hoc tests. Number of observations was 6 per interaction cell per age. ND = Not done.
Figure 1Micrograph of bursa of Fabricious of broiler at day 38 of age stained with HandE (X40) to investigate the follicle diameter in different groups; the distance between two follicular polar as presented all groups by lines: (A) Broilers supplemented with 0.02% Saccharomyces cerevisiae;(B) broilers supplemented with 0.04% Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Moderate enhancement in the follicular diameter was detected in broilers supplemented with 0.04% Saccharomyces cerevisiae (B).
Figure 2Micrograph of the thymus stained with HandE (X40) to explore the thymic cortical: medullary ratio.
Figure 3Micrograph of the spleen stained with HandE (X40) of regular density diet presented normal splenic histology featuring splenic arteriole (thin arrow) with white and red pulp (thick arrow). All groups presented the normal splenic histology as the control.