| Literature DB >> 32195272 |
Y A Attia1,2, H Al-Khalaifah3, H S Abd El-Hamid4, M A Al-Harthi1, A A El-Shafey2.
Abstract
This study was executed to investigate the effect of supplementing three multienzyme levels (0, 0. 1, and 0.2%) with two types of diet [standard diet (SD) vs. low-density diet (LDD)] on immune response, blood hematology and biochemistry, antioxidant status, and organ histology of broilers during 1-38 days of age. A total of 216 unsexed 1-day-old Arbor Acres broiler chicks were randomly distributed, on a factorial design (2 × 3), to six treatments each with six replicates. There were six chicks per replicate. Results showed that LDD significantly decreased body weight gain (BWG) of broilers, but did not affect the European Production Efficiency Index (EPEI). Addition of multienzymes at both levels (0.1 and 0.2%) significantly increased BWG and improved EPEI, compared to the control diet. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspirate aminotransferase (AST), malondialdehyde (MDA), lymphocyte, lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), and phagocyte activity (PA) were significantly higher for LDD than the SD, but eosinophil was lower. Supplementation of multienzymes significantly decreased ALT, AST, and MDA, compared to the control group, but increased packed cell volume (PCV), hemoglobin (Hgb), lymphocytes, and monocytes. Immune organs, such as spleen, thymus, and the bursa of Fabricius were significantly increased with multienzyme supplementation. It could be concluded that multienzyme supplementation at either 0.1 or 0.2% to SD or LDD improved EPEI and immune status of broiler chicks.Entities:
Keywords: broilers; immune response; multienzymes; nutrient density; supplementation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32195272 PMCID: PMC7015166 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental basal diets fed during the experiment stages.
| Maize | 512 | 517.8 | 549.2 | 460.8 | 466.02 | 494.28 |
| Wheat bran | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Rye | 0 | 50 | 70 | 0 | 45 | 63 |
| Soybean meal (44% CP) | 328 | 244 | 284 | 295.2 | 219.6 | 255.6 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 18.00 | 16.00 | 10.00 | 16.20 | 14.40 | 9.00 |
| Limestone | 10.00 | 10.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 7.20 |
| NaCl | 3.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 2.70 | 4.05 | 4.05 |
| Full fat soybean meal | 100 | 130 | 16.0 | 90 | 117 | 14.4 |
| Vit+min premix | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.70 | 2.70 | 2.70 |
| L-Lysine | 1.00 | 1.90 | 2.00 | 0.90 | 1.71 | 1.80 |
| DL-Methionine | 2.00 | 2.50 | 3.00 | 1.80 | 2.25 | 2.70 |
| Washed building sand | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| Vegetable oil | 22.70 | 20.00 | 50.00 | 20.43 | 18.00 | 45.00 |
| Total | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 |
| CP | 227 | 209 | 190 | 220 | 204 | 187 |
| ME (MJ/kg) | 12.63 | 12.78 | 13.37 | 11.92 | 12.05 | 12.58 |
| Calcium | 8.58 | 8.45 | 6.26 | 7.86 | 7.74 | 5.77 |
| Available phosphorus | 4.07 | 3.78 | 2.64 | 3.87 | 3.60 | 2.57 |
| Methionine | 5.48 | 5.71 | 5.94 | 5.16 | 5.37 | 5.57 |
| Methionine + cystine | 9.10 | 9.05 | 9.02 | 8.74 | 8.69 | 8.67 |
| Lysine | 13.18 | 12.53 | 11.28 | 12.50 | 11.90 | 10.78 |
| Crude fiber, % | 36.1 | 35.5 | 33 | 50.01 | 46.53 | 43.5 |
| Ash | 51.1 | 53.5 | 55 | 55.2 | 56 | 56.2 |
Vit+Min mix. provides per kilogram of the diet: Vit. A, 12,000 IU, vit. E (dl-α-tocopheryl acetate) 20 mg, menadione 2.3 mg, Vit. D3, 2,200 ICU, riboflavin 5.5 mg, calcium pantothenate 12 mg, nicotinic acid 50 mg, choline 250 mg, vit. B.
Calculated values based on NRC (1994) tables of analyses of feedstuffs.
Determined values.
Effect of different levels of multienzymes on growth of broiler chicks fed with standard and low-density diets during days 1–38 of age.
| Standard | 45.7 | 621 | 1,406 | 2,045 | 310 | |
| Low density | 45.8 | 580 | 1,346 | 1,928 | 304 | |
| SEM | 0.315 | 9.27 | 11.3 | 16.0 | 5.80 | |
| 0 | 45.9 | 563 | 1,266 | 1,844 | 281 | |
| 0.1 | 45.8 | 622 | 1,411 | 2,036 | 319 | |
| 0.2 | 45.5 | 616 | 1,451 | 2,079 | 321 | |
| SEM | 0.386 | 27.8 | 34.0 | 48.1 | 7.11 | |
| Standard | 0 | 45.4 | 614 | 1,300 | 1,937 | 288 |
| 0.1 | 46.3 | 628 | 1,431 | 2,071 | 320 | |
| 0.2 | 45.5 | 621 | 1,487 | 2,126 | 323 | |
| Low density | 0 | 46.5 | 512 | 1,233 | 1,750 | 274 |
| 0.1 | 45.4 | 616 | 1,391 | 2,001 | 318 | |
| 0.2 | 45.6 | 612 | 1,415 | 2,031 | 319 | |
| SEM | 0.546 | 32.4 | 39.7 | 56.2 | 10.0 | |
| Diet | 0.804 | 0.004 | 0.139 | 0.016 | 0.426 | |
| Multienzymes | 0.740 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
| Interaction | 0.209 | 0.01 | 0.935 | 0.554 | 0.811 | |
Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on SNK test.
SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effect of different concentrations of enzyme cocktail on blood hematological traits of broiler chicks fed with standard and low-density diets.
| Standard | 30.0 | 10.0 | 1.66 | 182 | 60.8 | 33.3 | |
| Low density | 30.0 | 10.1 | 1.62 | 188 | 63.3 | 33.7 | |
| SEM | 0.427 | 0.17 | 0.025 | 4.35 | 1.47 | 0.45 | |
| 0 | 28.3 | 9.43 | 1.60 | 180 | 59.7 | 33.2 | |
| 0.1 | 30.4 | 10.1 | 1.66 | 185 | 61.9 | 33.4 | |
| 0.2 | 31.4 | 10.6 | 1.66 | 191 | 64.4 | 33.8 | |
| SEM | 0.273 | 0.208 | 0.031 | 5.33 | 1.81 | 0.552 | |
| Standard | 0 | 27.0 | 8.75 | 1.58 | 172 | 55.7 | 32.4 |
| 0.1 | 30.7 | 10.37 | 1.71 | 182 | 61.1 | 33.7 | |
| 0.2 | 32.5 | 11.0 | 1.68 | 194 | 65.5 | 33.8 | |
| Low density | 0 | 29.7 | 10.1 | 1.61 | 188 | 63.8 | 34 |
| 0.1 | 30.1 | 10.0 | 1.61 | 188 | 62.7 | 33.2 | |
| 0.2 | 30.3 | 10.2 | 1.63 | 187 | 63.3 | 33.8 | |
| SEM | 0.739 | 0.295 | 0.044 | 7.54 | 2.091 | 0.781 | |
| Diet | 0.990 | 0.732 | 0.267 | 0.399 | 0.235 | 0.574 | |
| Enzyme | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.293 | 0.370 | 0.205 | 0.760 | |
| Interaction | 0.007 | 0.002 | 0.390 | 0.322 | 0.138 | 0.381 | |
Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on SNK test.
MCV, Mean corpuscular volume;
MCH, Mean corpuscular hemoglobin;
MCHC, Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. Number of observations were six per interaction cell. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effect of different concentrations of enzyme cocktail on white blood cell and its fractions of broiler chicks fed with standard and low-density diet.
| Standard | 22.6 | 41.0 | 10.6 | 0.54 | 10.0 | 23.5 | 0.577 | |
| Low density | 22.8 | 42.0 | 10.7 | 0.50 | 9.0 | 23.8 | 0.572 | |
| SEM | 0.19 | 0.32 | 0.186 | 0.12 | 0.171 | 0.286 | 0.082 | |
| 0 | 22.8 | 40.0 | 9.68 | 0.56 | 9.87 | 23.1 | 0.583 | |
| 0.1 | 22.6 | 41.7 | 11.3 | 0.43 | 9.37 | 24.1 | 0.583 | |
| 0.2 | 22.8 | 42.9 | 11.1 | 0.56 | 9.43 | 23.8 | 0.558 | |
| SEM | 0.232 | 0.392 | 0.228 | 0.147 | 0.209 | 0.35 | 0.101 | |
| Standard | 0 | 21.7 | 39.7 | 9.25 | 0.625 | 10.6 | 23.0 | 0.585 |
| 0.1 | 23.3 | 40.8 | 11.3 | 0.501 | 9.87 | 23.7 | 0.583 | |
| 0.2 | 22.7 | 42.6 | 11.3 | 0.500 | 9.75 | 24.0 | 0.563 | |
| Low density | 0 | 23.8 | 40.3 | 10.1 | 0.500 | 9.12 | 23.2 | 0.581 |
| 0.1 | 21.8 | 42.6 | 11.2 | 0.375 | 8.87 | 24.6 | 0.582 | |
| 0.2 | 22.8 | 43.2 | 10.8 | 0.625 | 9.12 | 23.7 | 0.552 | |
| SEM | 0.329 | 0.555 | 0.323 | 0.208 | 0.296 | 0.496 | 0.142 | |
| Diet | 0.358 | 0.034 | 0.754 | 0.808 | 0.001 | 0.476 | 0.644 | |
| Enzyme | 0.807 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.788 | 0.199 | 0.102 | 0.141 | |
| Interaction | 0.001 | 0.512 | 0.103 | 0.788 | 0.345 | 0.530 | 0.935 | |
Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on SNK test.
H/L ratio, Heterophil number/lymphocyte number as indication of stress; number of observations were six per interaction cell. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effect of different concentrations of enzyme on liver enzymes, blood serum malondialdehyde, and total antioxidant capacity of broiler chicks fed with standard and low-density diet.
| Standard | 63.5 | 54.8 | 1.15 | 11.0 | 1.26 | 425 | 337.3 | |
| Low density | 65.2 | 56.7 | 1.15 | 11.3 | 1.46 | 424 | 290.4 | |
| SEM | 0.255 | 0.443 | 0.0086 | 0.224 | 0.037 | 2.03 | 1.56 | |
| 0 | 66.0 | 58.0 | 1.14 | 11.5 | 1.57 | 436 | 277.7 | |
| 0.1 | 63.1 | 54.8 | 1.15 | 10.6 | 1.26 | 417 | 331.0 | |
| 0.2 | 63.9 | 54.5 | 1.17 | 11.4 | 1.25 | 419 | 335.2 | |
| SEM | 0.313 | 0.543 | 0.01 | 0.275 | 0.045 | 2.48 | 1.91 | |
| Standard | 0 | 65.5 | 57.1 | 1.14 | 11.6 | 1.41 | 443 | 314.2 |
| 0.1 | 61.7 | 53.1 | 1.16 | 10.5 | 1.17 | 414 | 353.8 | |
| 0.2 | 63.2 | 54.3 | 1.16 | 11.1 | 1.21 | 418 | 345.5 | |
| Low density | 0 | 66.6 | 58.8 | 1.13 | 11.3 | 1.73 | 430 | 248.6 |
| 0.1 | 64.5 | 56.6 | 1.14 | 10.8 | 1.36 | 420 | 308.8 | |
| 0.2 | 64.6 | 54.6 | 1.18 | 11.7 | 1.31 | 421 | 321.4 | |
| SEM | 0.443 | 0.768 | 0.015 | 0.388 | 0.064 | 3.52 | 2.70 | |
| Diet | 0.001 | 0.006 | 0.679 | 0.436 | 0.005 | 0.656 | 0.003 | |
| Enzyme | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.100 | 0.080 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
| Interaction | 0.156 | 0.120 | 0.349 | 0.517 | 0.193 | 0.022 | 0.036 | |
Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on SNK test.
ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; AST/ALT, aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio; MDA, malondialdehyde. Number of observations was 12 per interaction cell. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effect of different concentrations of enzyme cocktail on biochemical constituents of blood serum of broiler chicks fed with standard and low-density diet.
| Standard | 4.91 | 2.70 | 2.21 | 0.951 | 0.708 | 0.549 | 0.825 | |
| Low density | 4.85 | 2.73 | 2.12 | 0.879 | 0.709 | 0.533 | 0.779 | |
| SEM | 0.075 | 0.088 | 0.064 | 0.041 | 0.021 | 0.038 | 0.044 | |
| 0 | 4.73 | 2.64 | 2.09 | 0.837 | 0.651 | 0.600 | 0.797 | |
| 0.1 | 4.86 | 2.70 | 2.16 | 0.906 | 0.750 | 0.506 | 0.809 | |
| 0.2 | 5.06 | 2.81 | 2.24 | 1.003 | 0.712 | 0.519 | 0.802 | |
| SEM | 0.092 | 0.108 | 0.078 | 0.05 | 0.026 | 0.047 | 0.054 | |
| Standard | 0 | 4.78 | 2.63 | 2.15 | 0.837 | 0.637 | 0.675 | 0.821 |
| 0.1 | 4.86 | 2.75 | 2.11 | 0.887 | 0.762 | 0.462 | 0.783 | |
| 0.2 | 5.10 | 2.72 | 2.37 | 1.130 | 0.725 | 0.512 | 0.872 | |
| Low density | 0 | 4.68 | 2.65 | 2.03 | 0.837 | 0.675 | 0.525 | 0.773 |
| 0.1 | 4.86 | 2.65 | 2.21 | 0.925 | 0.737 | 0.550 | 0.834 | |
| 0.2 | 5.02 | 2.91 | 2.11 | 0.875 | 0.712 | 0.525 | 0.731 | |
| SEM | 0.13 | 0.153 | 0.111 | 0.07 | 0.037 | 0.67 | 0.076 | |
| Diet | 0.588 | 0.792 | 0.320 | 0.205 | 0.990 | 0.763 | 0.369 | |
| Enzyme | 0.055 | 0.515 | 0.412 | 0.071 | 0.050 | 0.327 | 0.992 | |
| Interaction | 0.924 | 0.645 | 0.275 | 0.084 | 0.680 | 0.208 | 0.453 | |
Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on SNK test.
GAR, Globulin to albumin ratio. Number of observations were 12 per interaction cell. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effect of different concentrations of enzyme cocktail on immune organs and antibody titer of broiler chicks fed with standard and low-density diet.
| Standard | 2.19 | 0.12 | 7.72 | 0.46 | 2.92 | 0.19 | 3.22 | 0.58 | |
| Low density | 2.13 | 0.13 | 8.08 | 0.52 | 3.14 | 0.21 | 3.55 | 1.62 | |
| SEM | 0.092 | 0.004 | 0.201 | 0.017 | 0.122 | 0.008 | 2.77 | 0.197 | |
| 0 | 1.69 | 0.110 | 6.37 | 0.425 | 2.32 | 0.167 | 1.12 | 0.125 | |
| 0.1 | 2.52 | 0.147 | 8.42 | 0.503 | 3.26 | 0.208 | 4.12 | 1.81 | |
| 0.2 | 2.27 | 0.139 | 8.91 | 0.556 | 3.51 | 0.230 | 4.91 | 1.37 | |
| SEM | 0.113 | 0.005 | 0.247 | 0.020 | 0.349 | 0.01 | 0.339 | 0.241 | |
| Standard | 0 | 1.97 | 0.112 | 8.19 | 0.366 | 2.51 | 0.162 | 1.16 | 0.25 |
| 0.1 | 2.34 | 0.135 | 8.20 | 0.481 | 2.91 | 0.187 | 3.41 | 1.12 | |
| 0.2 | 2.26 | 0.136 | 8.76 | 0.539 | 3.35 | 0.224 | 5.08 | 0.37 | |
| Low density | 0 | 1.40 | 0.108 | 6.55 | 0.484 | 2.14 | 0.171 | 1.08 | 0.00 |
| 0.1 | 2.71 | 0.159 | 8.64 | 0.524 | 3.61 | 0.228 | 4.83 | 2.50 | |
| 0.2 | 2.29 | 0.142 | 9.07 | 0.573 | 3.61 | 0.237 | 4.75 | 2.37 | |
| SEM | 0.160 | 0.008 | 0.349 | 0.029 | 0.212 | 0.015 | 0.480 | 0.371 | |
| Diet | 0.654 | 0.252 | 0.207 | 0.010 | 0.224 | 0.094 | 0.400 | 0.004 | |
| Enzyme | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
| Interaction | 0.017 | 0.258 | 0.982 | 0.300 | 0.047 | 0.513 | 0.152 | 0.030 | |
Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on SNK test.
Number of observations were six per interaction cell. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effect of different concentrations of enzyme cocktail on immune index of broiler chicks fed with standard and low-density diet.
| Standard | 23.2 | 42.2 | 0.080 | 1.58 | 17.2 | |
| Low density | 26.3 | 43.9 | 0.120 | 1.56 | 19.0 | |
| SEM | 0.596 | 0.571 | 0.018 | 0.026 | 0.318 | |
| 0 | 24.8 | 43.9 | 0.080 | 1.46 | 17.5 | |
| 0.1 | 24.8 | 42.6 | 0.130 | 1.58 | 18.1 | |
| 0.2 | 24.6 | 42.7 | 0.090 | 1.68 | 18.6 | |
| SEM | 0.697 | 0.699 | 0.022 | 0.032 | 0.389 | |
| Standard | 0 | 23.6 | 43.2 | 0.071 | 1.45 | 16.0 |
| 0.1 | 22.8 | 41.7 | 0.087 | 1.58 | 17.2 | |
| 0.2 | 23.2 | 41.8 | 0.086 | 1.72 | 18.5 | |
| Low density | 0 | 26.1 | 44.6 | 0.091 | 1.47 | 19 |
| 0.1 | 26.8 | 43.6 | 0.176 | 1.58 | 19.1 | |
| 0.2 | 26.0 | 43.6 | 0.097 | 1.63 | 18.8 | |
| SEM | 9.86 | 9.89 | 0.031 | 0.046 | 0.551 | |
| Diet | 0.001 | 0.046 | 0.130 | 0.589 | 0.004 | |
| Enzyme | 0.958 | 0.373 | 0.253 | 0.002 | 0.110 | |
| Interaction | 0.720 | 0.966 | 0.415 | 0.459 | 0.070 | |
Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on SNK test.
LTT, Lymphocyte Transformation Test; BACT, Bactericidal Activity; LYS, Lysozyme Activity; TAC, Total Antioxidant Capacity; PI, Phagocytic Index; PA, Phagocytic Activity. Number of observations were six per interaction cell. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effect of type of diet and enzyme cocktail supplementation of morphology of the intestinal and Fabricius bursa.
| Standard | 235 | 166 | |
| Low density | 250 | 174 | |
| SEM | 5.76 | 4.39 | |
| 0 | 215 | 157 | |
| 0.1 | 285 | 183 | |
| 0.2 | 226 | 169 | |
| SEM | 7.05 | 5.38 | |
| Standard | 0 | 211 | 157 |
| 0.1 | 269 | 175 | |
| 0.2 | 223 | 163 | |
| Low density | 0 | 219 | 157 |
| 0.1 | 301 | 191 | |
| 0.2 | 228 | 174 | |
| SEM | 9.98 | 7.6 | |
| Diet | 0.078 | 0.166 | |
| Enzyme | 0.001 | 0.008 | |
| Interaction | 0.348 | 0.537 | |
Means within a column with different superscripts are significantly different based on SNK test. SEM, standard error of the mean. The number of replicates was six per treatment and the number of sections/slide was five per replicate per treatment.
Figure 1Micrograph of the bursa of Fabricius of broiler at day 28 of age stained with H&E (×40) to compare the follicle diameter in different groups; the distance between two follicular polar as shown all groups by lines: (A) broiler fed with a standard diet supplemented with 0.1% ml enzyme cocktail; (B) broiler fed with a diet supplemented with 0.2% of multienzyme. Moderate increase in the follicular diameter was noticed in broiler fed with diet supplemented with 0.1% of multienzyme (A).
Figure 2Micrograph of the bursa of Fabricius of broiler at day 28 of age stained with H&E (×40) to compare the follicle diameter in different groups; the distance between two follicular polar as shown all groups by lines: (A) broiler fed with low density diet supplemented with 0.1% of multienzyme; (B) broiler fed with a diet supplemented with 0.2% of multienzyme. Moderate increase in the follicular diameter was noticed in broiler fed with a diet supplemented with 0.1% of multienzyme (A).
Figure 3Micrograph of the thymus stained with H&E (×40) to compare the thymic cortical/medullary ratio: (A) the cortic/medullary ratio is 2:1 as shown in all groups at day 28 of age; (B) the cortic/medullary ration is 3:1 as shown in all groups at day 38 of age, which associated with physiological aged thymic atrophy.
Figure 4Micrograph of the spleen stained with H&E (×40) of control group shown with normal splenic histology featuring splenic arteriole (thin arrow) with white and red pulp (thick arrow). All groups showed the normal splenic histology as control.