| Literature DB >> 35200610 |
Safwan Safwan1,2, Shih-Wei Wang3,4, George Hsiao5,6, Sui-Wen Hsiao7, Su-Jung Hsu8, Tzong-Huei Lee9, Ching-Kuo Lee1,7,8.
Abstract
Eight trichothecenes, including four new compounds 1-4 and four known entities 5-8, together with one known cyclonerane (9) were isolated from the solid-state fermentation of Trichoderma brevicompactum NTU439 isolated from the marine alga Mastophora rosea. The structures of 1-9 were determined by 1D/2D NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance), MS (mass spectrometry), and IR (infrared spectroscopy) spectroscopic data. All of the compounds were evaluated for cytotoxic activity against HCT-116, PC-3, and SK-Hep-1 cancer cells by the SRB assay, and compound 8 showed promising cytotoxic activity against all three cancer cell lines with the IC50 values of 3.3 ± 0.3, 5.3 ± 0.3, and 1.8 ± 0.8 μM, respectively. Compounds 1-2, 4-6, and 7-8 potently inhibited LPS-induced NO production, and compounds 5 and 8 showed markedly inhibited gelatinolysis of MMP-9 in S1 protein-stimulated THP-1 monocytes.Entities:
Keywords: Trichoderma brevicompactum; cytotoxic activities; endophytic fungus; marine alga; trichothecenes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35200610 PMCID: PMC8875558 DOI: 10.3390/md20020080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1–9.
1H NMR data (600 MHz, MeOH-d4) of compounds 1–4.
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4.15, d (5.3) | 3.67, d (5.3) | 4.18, d (5.3) | 3.66, d (5.3) |
| 3a | 2.47, dd (16.3, 7.5) | 2.49, dd (15.1, 7.6) | 2.50, dd, (16.4, 7.6) | 2.37, dd (15.0, 7.8) |
| 3b | 1.77, ddd (16.3, 5.3, 1.6) | 1.87, ddd (15.1, 5.3, 3.2) | 1.80, ddd, (16.4, 5.3, 1.8) | 1.80, ddd (15.0, 5.3, 3.5) |
| 4 | 4.04, dd (7.5, 1.6) | 4.41, dd (7.6, 3.5) | 4.05, dd (7.6, 1.5) | 4.29, dd (7.8, 3.5) |
| 7a | 2.05, dd (14.2, 5.6) | 1.91, dd (12.6, 9.1) | 1.88, dt (12.9, 5.9) | 1.98, dd (13.8, 4.4) |
| 7b | 1.67, dd (14.2, 1.3) | 1.51, m (12.6) | 1.50, ddd (12.9, 5.3, 1.5) | 1.17, br, dd (13.8, 4.4) |
| 8a | 4.01, d (5.6) | 2.05, m | 2.18, m | 1.70, m |
| 8b | 2.03, m | 2.05, m | 1.64, dt (14.1, 4.4) | |
| 9 | 1.75, m | |||
| 10a | 5.39, q (1.2) | 5.59, dt (5.6, 1.5) | 5.60, br | 1.92, ddd (15.3, 6.5, 3.8) |
| 10b | 1.59, m | |||
| 11 | 3.64, d (5.6) | 3.39, br | ||
| 13a | 3.85, d (12.0) | 2.99, d (4.1) | 3.89, d (11.4) | 3.04, d (4.0) |
| 13b | 3.83, d (12.0) | 2.80, d (4.1) | 3.85, d (11.4) | 2.83, d (4.0) |
| 14 | 0.99, s | 0.78, s | 1.01, s | 0.73, s |
| 15 | 1.04, s | 0.88, s | 0.89, s | 0.99, s |
| 16a | 1.87, d (1.2) | 3.97, br | 3.98, br | 3.74, dd (10.9, 5.6) |
| 16b | 3.94, br | 3.47, dd (10.9, 5.6) |
13C NMR data (150 Hz, MeOH-d4) of compounds 1–4.
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 81.2, CH | 79.3, CH | 82.9, CH | 79.2, CH |
| 3 | 40.9, CH2 | 38.4, CH2 | 42.4, CH2 | 38.4, CH2 |
| 4 | 74.6, CH | 72.5, CH | 76.3, CH | 72.3, CH |
| 5 | 54.2, C | 48.7, C | 55.5, C | 49.2, C |
| 6 | 46.9, C | 40.2, C | 48.0, C | 40.7, C |
| 7 | 38.9, CH2 | 23.8, CH2 | 31.6, CH2 | 22.7, CH2 |
| 8 | 66.7, CH | 23.0, CH2 | 25.3, CH2 | 20.9, CH2 |
| 9 | 144.7, C | 142.9, C | 149.5, C | 33.9, CH |
| 10 | 118.2, CH | 118.1, CH | 116.7, CH | 27.9, CH2 |
| 11 | 107.5, C | 69.9, CH | 108.9, C | 71.8, CH |
| 12 | 95.0, C | 65.2, C | 96.9, C | 65.4, C |
| 13 | 58.1, CH2 | 46.5, CH2 | 59.8, CH2 | 46.9, CH2 |
| 14 | 9.6, CH3 | 4.9, CH3 | 14.7, CH3 | 4.6, CH3 |
| 15 | 16.0, CH3 | 14.6, CH3 | 10.9, CH3 | 16.3, CH3 |
| 16 | 19.1, CH3 | 64.8, CH2 | 65.6, CH2 | 64.3, CH2 |
Figure 2Key HMBC () and COSY () correlations of compounds 1–4.
IC50 values of compounds 1–9 against three cancer cell lines (HCT-116, PC-3, and SK-Hep-1), inhibition of NO production in microglial BV-2 cell-induced LPS treated with 10 μM of compounds 1–9, and percent cell viability in BV-2 cell.
| Compounds | Cytotoxicity (IC50, μM) | NO (μM) ± SD | Cell Viability (%) ± SD in BV-2 Cell | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCT-116 | PC-3 | SK-Hep-1 | |||
|
| >10 | >10 | >10 | 10.8 ± 2.1 *** | 95.4 ± 5.7 |
|
| >10 | >10 | >10 | 8.1 ± 0.7 *** | 99.9 ± 1.6 |
|
| >10 | >10 | >10 | 12.4 ± 1.7 ** | 105.8 ± 2.9 |
|
| >10 | >10 | >10 | 9.2 ± 1.2 *** | 102.8 ± 9.4 |
|
| 5.4 ± 0.3 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.5 *** | 62.9 ± 3.7 *** |
|
| >10 | >10 | >10 | 12.1 ± 1.5 ** | 104.9 ± 12.2 |
|
| 7.5 ± 0.3 | 9.3 ± 0.4 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 1.1 *** | 94.7 ± 17.8 |
|
| 3.3 ± 0.3 | 5.3 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 0.1 *** | 63.3 ± 6.4 *** |
|
| >10 | >10 | >10 | 12.5 ± 0.8 ** | 103.5 ± 4.5 |
| Trichodermin a | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | - | - |
| Resting | - | - | - | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 100 ± 0.0 |
| Vehicle | - | - | - | 16.4 ± 0.5 ### | - |
a Positive control for cytotoxicity test; ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with the vehicle; ### p < 0.001 compared with the resting.
Figure 3Gelatinolytic activity of MMP-9 in S1 protein-stimulated THP-1 monocytes. Zymogram shows the different activity of MMP-9 upon treatment of THP-1 monocytes with the different compounds (A). The relative quantification of gelatinase MMP-9 is reported in (B). R: resting (condition with no stimulation); V: vehicle (DMSO) with S1 protein THP-1 monocytes cells. Data represent means ± S.D. # p < 0.01 compared with the resting; * p < 0.05 compared with the vehicle.