Literature DB >> 27576325

A low or high BMI is a risk factor for renal hematoma after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones.

Fabio Nussberger1, Beat Roth1, Tobias Metzger1, Bernhard Kiss1, George N Thalmann1, Roland Seiler2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for renal hematoma after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for kidney stones in a matched case-control analysis of a subgroup of patients recruited from a prospective randomized cohort. Between 06/2010 and 03/2013, 418 patients underwent SWL with the MODULITH®-SLX-F2-lithotripter for kidney stones. In 39/418 patients (9 %), ultrasound at post-treatment day 1 revealed renal hematomas. For 37 of these patients, a matched group without hematoma could be selected according to the following matching criteria: age, gender, number and energy of shock waves, stone burden and localization. Risk factors for renal hematoma after SWL were compared between the two groups. The rates of diabetes, stopped anticoagulant/antiplatelet medications and arterial hypertension were not different between the two groups (p > 0.2). The skin-kidney distance was virtually the same in both groups (p = 0.5). In the hematoma group, significantly more patients had a high (>30: n = 16) as well as a low (<21.5: n = 4) BMI when compared to the control group (n = 4; n = 0; p < 0.001). Importantly, all patients with BMI <21.5 developed renal hematomas after SWL. Patients with a high (>30) or low (<21.5) BMI had a higher risk for renal damage after SWL. Therefore, alternative endoscopic treatment options should be considered in these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Case–control analysis; Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Renal hematoma; Stones

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27576325     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0915-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  23 in total

1.  Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Glenn M Preminger; Dean G Assimos; James E Lingeman; Stephen Y Nakada; Margaret S Pearle; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prognostic variables for shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment success: no impact of body mass index (BMI) using a third generation lithotripter.

Authors:  Gencay Hatiboglu; Valentin Popeneciu; Martin Kurosch; Johannes Huber; Sascha Pahernik; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Axel Haferkamp; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Association between dietary fat intake and plasma factor VII coagulant activity--a predictor of cardiovascular mortality.

Authors:  G J Miller; J C Martin; J Webster; H Wilkes; N E Miller; W H Wilkinson; T W Meade
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  G W Drach; S Dretler; W Fair; B Finlayson; J Gillenwater; D Griffith; J Lingeman; D Newman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A prospective randomised trial comparing the modified HM3 with the MODULITH® SLX-F2 lithotripter.

Authors:  Pascal Zehnder; Beat Roth; Frédéric Birkhäuser; Silvia Schneider; Rolf Schmutz; George N Thalmann; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  A multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with subcapsular hematoma formation following electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Nivedita Bhatta Dhar; Julie Thornton; Matthew T Karafa; Stevan B Streem
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal pelvicalyceal stones in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  V A Mezentsev
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; E Schmiedt; D Jocham; W Brendel; B Forssmann; V Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Identifying risk factors in development of clinically significant post-shock-wave lithotripsy subcapsular hematomas.

Authors:  L H Newman; B Saltzman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Hemostatic factors and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Michael S Kostapanos; Matilda Florentin; Moses S Elisaf; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Curr Vasc Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.719

View more
  4 in total

1.  The effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the management of kidney stones: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Chun Qiang; Yu-Ge Guo; Yun-Qi Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Extremely-slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal stones <20 mm.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Ito; Toshifumi Takahashi; Toru Kanno; Takashi Okada; Yoshihito Higashi; Hitoshi Yamada
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-12-03

Review 3.  Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Luke F Reynolds; Tad Kroczak; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-09-04

4.  Oral chemolysis is an effective, non-invasive therapy for urinary stones suspected of uric acid content.

Authors:  Arman Tsaturyan; Elizaveta Bokova; Piet Bosshard; Olivier Bonny; Daniel G Fuster; Beat Roth
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.436

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.