Literature DB >> 28709103

End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring.

Aakash C Rai1, Prashant Kumar2, Francesco Pilla3, Andreas N Skouloudis4, Silvana Di Sabatino5, Carlo Ratti6, Ansar Yasar7, David Rickerby4.   

Abstract

Low-cost sensor technology can potentially revolutionise the area of air pollution monitoring by providing high-density spatiotemporal pollution data. Such data can be utilised for supplementing traditional pollution monitoring, improving exposure estimates, and raising community awareness about air pollution. However, data quality remains a major concern that hinders the widespread adoption of low-cost sensor technology. Unreliable data may mislead unsuspecting users and potentially lead to alarming consequences such as reporting acceptable air pollutant levels when they are above the limits deemed safe for human health. This article provides scientific guidance to the end-users for effectively deploying low-cost sensors for monitoring air pollution and people's exposure, while ensuring reasonable data quality. We review the performance characteristics of several low-cost particle and gas monitoring sensors and provide recommendations to end-users for making proper sensor selection by summarizing the capabilities and limitations of such sensors. The challenges, best practices, and future outlook for effectively deploying low-cost sensors, and maintaining data quality are also discussed. For data quality assurance, a two-stage sensor calibration process is recommended, which includes laboratory calibration under controlled conditions by the manufacturer supplemented with routine calibration checks performed by the end-user under final deployment conditions. For large sensor networks where routine calibration checks are impractical, statistical techniques for data quality assurance should be utilised. Further advancements and adoption of sophisticated mathematical and statistical techniques for sensor calibration, fault detection, and data quality assurance can indeed help to realise the promised benefits of a low-cost air pollution sensor network.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental sensing; Human health; Outdoor pollution sensing; Pollution exposure; Real-time exposure

Year:  2017        PMID: 28709103     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  39 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers' Perspectives.

Authors:  Brigida Alfano; Luigi Barretta; Antonio Del Giudice; Saverio De Vito; Girolamo Di Francia; Elena Esposito; Fabrizio Formisano; Ettore Massera; Maria Lucia Miglietta; Tiziana Polichetti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Opportunities and Challenges for Filling the Air Quality Data Gap in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Robert W Pinder; Jacqueline M Klopp; Gary Kleiman; Gayle S W Hagler; Yewande Awe; Sara Terry
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Advantages and challenges of the implementation of a low-cost particulate matter monitoring system as a decision-making tool.

Authors:  Víctor Caquilpán P; Gabriel Aros G; Sebastián Elgueta A; Rodrigo Díaz S; Gonzalo Sepúlveda K; Carlos Sierralta J
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Field Test of Several Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in High and Low Concentration Urban Environments.

Authors:  Karoline K Johnson; Michael H Bergin; Armistead G Russell; Gayle S W Hagler
Journal:  Aerosol Air Qual Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  The Kansas City Transportation and Local-Scale Air Quality Study (KC-TRAQS): Integration of Low-Cost Sensors and Reference Grade Monitoring in a Complex Metropolitan Area. Part 1: Overview of the Project.

Authors:  Sue Kimbrough; Stephen Krabbe; Richard Baldauf; Timothy Barzyk; Matthew Brown; Steven Brown; Carry Croghan; Michael Davis; Parikshit Deshmukh; Rachelle Duvall; Stephen Feinberg; Vlad Isakov; Russell Logan; Tim McArthur; Amy Shields
Journal:  Chemosensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-27

Review 6.  Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone?

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Phong K Thai; Xiaoting Liu; Akwasi Asumadu-Sakyi; Godwin Ayoko; Alena Bartonova; Andrea Bedini; Fahe Chai; Bryce Christensen; Matthew Dunbabin; Jian Gao; Gayle S W Hagler; Rohan Jayaratne; Prashant Kumar; Alexis K H Lau; Peter K K Louie; Mandana Mazaheri; Zhi Ning; Nunzio Motta; Ben Mullins; Md Mahmudur Rahman; Zoran Ristovski; Mahnaz Shafiei; Dian Tjondronegoro; Dane Westerdahl; Ron Williams
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Multicomponent Gas Using Sensor Array.

Authors:  Shurui Fan; Zirui Li; Kewen Xia; Dongxia Hao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Deliberating Performance Targets: Follow-on workshop discussing PM10, NO2, CO, and SO2 air sensor targets.

Authors:  R M Duvall; G S W Hagler; A L Clements; K Benedict; K Barkjohn; V Kilaru; T Hanley; N Watkins; A Kaufman; A Kamal; S Reece; P Fransioli; M Gerboles; G Gillerman; R Habre; M Hannigan; Z Ning; V Papapostolou; R Pope; P J E Quintana; J Lam Snyder
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  In-House Filtration Efficiency Assessment of Vapor Hydrogen Peroxide Decontaminated Filtering Facepiece Respirators (FFRs).

Authors:  Khaled Al-Hadyan; Ghazi Alsbeih; Ahmad Nobah; Jeffrey Lindstrom; Sawsan Falatah; Nawarh Faran; Salem Al-Ghamdi; Belal Moftah; Rashed Alhmaid
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Mapping pollution exposure and chemistry during an extreme air quality event (the 2018 Kīlauea eruption) using a low-cost sensor network.

Authors:  Ben Crawford; David H Hagan; Ilene Grossman; Elizabeth Cole; Lacey Holland; Colette L Heald; Jesse H Kroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.