| Literature DB >> 35194197 |
Carolina Donat-Vargas1,2,3, Ángel Guerrero-Zotano4, Virginia Lope5,6, Begoña Bermejo7, Ana Casas8, José Manuel Baena-Cañada9,10, Silvia Antolín11, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira12, Antonio Antón13, José Ángel Garcia-Saénz14, Manuel Ramos15, Montserrat Muñoz16,17, Ana de Juan18, Carlos Jara Sánchez19, José Ignacio Chacón20, Miguel Gil-Gil21, Raquel Andrés Conejero22, Antonio Llombart23, Susana Bezares24, Nerea Fernández de Larrea-Baz5,6, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez5,6, Miguel Martín25,26, Marina Pollán27,28.
Abstract
The Epi-GEICAM study comprises 1017 invasive BC cases matched with controls of similar age (49 ± 9 years) and residence. Diet and OO consumption were collected through a validated food frequency questionnaire. 75% of women referred OO, common (refined) or virgin, as the main fat source. Using conditional logistic regression models, we compared different scenarios of type and frequency of OO consumption, using as reference those women not always using OO for the three culinary practices (seasoning, cooking, and frying) and adding <2 tablespoons (tbsps.) per day during the meal to bread, salad, or dishes. A substantial inverse association was observed in those women always using VOO for the three culinary practices and consuming ≥2 tbsps. of OO per day during meals (adjusted OR, 0.72; 95% CI: 0.51, 1.03; P = 0.07). Potential benefits from OO consumption, at least as regards the protection provided for BC, could be mostly conferred with VOO, and when its consumption is high.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35194197 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-022-01101-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0954-3007 Impact factor: 4.884