Literature DB >> 35191017

"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Shoshana M Rosenberg1, Jennifer M Gierisch2,3,4, Anna C Revette5, Carol L Lowenstein5, Elizabeth S Frank1, Deborah E Collyar6, Thomas Lynch7, Alastair M Thompson8, Ann H Partridge1, E Shelley Hwang7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Of the nearly 50,000 women in the United States who undergo treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) annually, many may not benefit from treatment. To better understand the impact of a DCIS diagnosis, patients self-identified as having had DCIS were engaged regarding their experience.
METHODS: In July 2014, a web-based survey was administered through the Susan Love Army of Women breast cancer listserv. The survey included open-ended questions designed to assess patients' perspectives about DCIS diagnosis and treatment. Deductive and inductive codes were applied to the responses; common themes were summarized.
RESULTS: Among the 1832 women included in the analytic sample, the median age at diagnosis was 60 years. Four primary themes were identified: 1) uncertainty surrounding a DCIS diagnosis, 2) uncertainty about DCIS treatment, 3) concern about treatment side effects, and 4) concern about recurrence and/or developing invasive breast cancer. When diagnosed, participants were often uncertain about whether they had cancer or not and whether they should be considered a "survivor." Uncertainty about treatment manifested as questioning the appropriateness of the amount of treatment received. Participants expressed concern about the "cancer spreading" or becoming invasive and that they were not necessarily "doing enough" to prevent recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large, national sample, participants with a history of DCIS reported confusion and concern about the diagnosis and treatment, which caused worry and significant uncertainty. Developing strategies to improve patient and provider communications regarding the nature of DCIS and acknowledging gaps in the current knowledge of management options should be a priority.
© 2022 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ductal carcinoma in situ; knowledge; patient-centered; qualitative; stakeholder engagement

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35191017      PMCID: PMC9274613          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.921


  38 in total

1.  Breast cancer classification: time for a change.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Stefano Zurrida; Aron Goldhirsch; Nicole Rotmensz; Giuseppe Viale
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A longitudinal study of factors associated with perceived risk of recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early-stage invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Maria Pérez; Mario Schootman; Rebecca L Aft; William E Gillanders; Matthew J Ellis; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial.

Authors:  Adele Francis; Jeremy Thomas; Lesley Fallowfield; Matthew Wallis; John M S Bartlett; Cassandra Brookes; Tracy Roberts; Sarah Pirrie; Claire Gaunt; Jennie Young; Lucinda Billingham; David Dodwell; Andrew Hanby; Sarah E Pinder; Andrew Evans; Malcolm Reed; Valerie Jenkins; Lucy Matthews; Maggie Wilcox; Patricia Fairbrother; Sarah Bowden; Daniel Rea
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Renaming ductal carcinoma in situ: would removing "carcinoma" reduce overtreatment?

Authors:  Sara H Javid; L Christine Fang; Larissa Korde; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 5.  The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review.

Authors:  Bircan Erbas; Elena Provenzano; Jane Armes; Dorota Gertig
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Knowledge, satisfaction with information, decisional conflict and psychological morbidity amongst women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Simone De Morgan; Sally Redman; Catherine D'Este; Kris Rogers
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-09

7.  Characterizing the impact of 25 years of DCIS treatment.

Authors:  Elissa M Ozanne; Yiwey Shieh; James Barnes; Colleen Bouzan; E Shelley Hwang; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of UK Breast Surgeons' Views on the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Gurdeep S Mannu; Joao H Bettencourt-Silva; Farid Ahmed; Giles Cunnick
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-11-30

9.  Epidemiology, Biology, Treatment, and Prevention of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Rinaa S Punglia; Kaitlyn Bifolck; Mehra Golshan; Constance Lehman; Laura Collins; Kornelia Polyak; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Judy Garber; Shelley E Hwang; Stuart J Schnitt; Ann H Partridge; Tari A King
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2018-12-27

10.  Perceptions of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) among UK health professionals.

Authors:  Fiona Kennedy; Diana Harcourt; Nichola Rumsey
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  1 in total

1.  Countercurrents: DCIS or Cancer? Why All the Confusion?

Authors:  Steven A Narod; Victoria Sopik
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.109

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.