| Literature DB >> 26296293 |
Adele Francis1, Jeremy Thomas2, Lesley Fallowfield3, Matthew Wallis4, John M S Bartlett5, Cassandra Brookes6, Tracy Roberts7, Sarah Pirrie6, Claire Gaunt6, Jennie Young6, Lucinda Billingham6, David Dodwell8, Andrew Hanby9, Sarah E Pinder10, Andrew Evans11, Malcolm Reed12, Valerie Jenkins3, Lucy Matthews3, Maggie Wilcox13, Patricia Fairbrother13, Sarah Bowden6, Daniel Rea6.
Abstract
Overdiagnosis, and thus overtreatment, are inevitable consequences of most screening programmes; identification of ways of minimising the impact of overdiagnosis demands new prospective research, in particular the need to separate clinically relevant lesions that require active treatment from those that can be safely left alone or monitored and only need treated if they change characteristics. Breast cancer screening has led to a large increase in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnoses. This is a widely heterogeneous disease and most DCIS detected through screening is of high cytonuclear grade and therefore likely to be important clinically. However, the historic practice of surgical treatment for all DCIS is unlikely to be optimal for lower risk patients. A clearer understanding of how to manage DCIS is required. This article describes the background and development of 'The low risk' DCIS trial (LORIS), a phase III trial of surgery versus active monitoring. LORIS will determine if it is appropriate to manage women with screen detected or asymptomatic, low grade and intermediate grade DCIS with low grade features, by active monitoring rather than by surgical treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Breast screening; Clinical trial; DCIS; Low grade DCIS; Over treatment
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26296293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Cancer ISSN: 0959-8049 Impact factor: 9.162