Literature DB >> 26296293

Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial.

Adele Francis1, Jeremy Thomas2, Lesley Fallowfield3, Matthew Wallis4, John M S Bartlett5, Cassandra Brookes6, Tracy Roberts7, Sarah Pirrie6, Claire Gaunt6, Jennie Young6, Lucinda Billingham6, David Dodwell8, Andrew Hanby9, Sarah E Pinder10, Andrew Evans11, Malcolm Reed12, Valerie Jenkins3, Lucy Matthews3, Maggie Wilcox13, Patricia Fairbrother13, Sarah Bowden6, Daniel Rea6.   

Abstract

Overdiagnosis, and thus overtreatment, are inevitable consequences of most screening programmes; identification of ways of minimising the impact of overdiagnosis demands new prospective research, in particular the need to separate clinically relevant lesions that require active treatment from those that can be safely left alone or monitored and only need treated if they change characteristics. Breast cancer screening has led to a large increase in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnoses. This is a widely heterogeneous disease and most DCIS detected through screening is of high cytonuclear grade and therefore likely to be important clinically. However, the historic practice of surgical treatment for all DCIS is unlikely to be optimal for lower risk patients. A clearer understanding of how to manage DCIS is required. This article describes the background and development of 'The low risk' DCIS trial (LORIS), a phase III trial of surgery versus active monitoring. LORIS will determine if it is appropriate to manage women with screen detected or asymptomatic, low grade and intermediate grade DCIS with low grade features, by active monitoring rather than by surgical treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast screening; Clinical trial; DCIS; Low grade DCIS; Over treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26296293     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  82 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.

Authors:  Geunwon Kim; Peter G Mikhael; Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparative effectiveness of incorporating a hypothetical DCIS prognostic marker into breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy Trentham-Dietz; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Oguzhan Alagoz; Natasha K Stout; Ronald E Gangnon; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Pamela M Vacek; Sally D Herschorn; Elizabeth S Burnside; Anna N A Tosteson; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Preparing for the renaissance: treating breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic and planning for a safe re-emergence to routine surgical care within a universal health care system.

Authors:  D Berger-Richardson; G Ko; N J Look Hong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ grade via triple-modal molecular imaging of B7-H3 expression.

Authors:  Sunitha Bachawal; Gregory R Bean; Gregor Krings; Katheryne E Wilson
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 5.  Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast: Present Approaches and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lawrence J Solin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Therese Bevers; Henry M Kuerer; Benjamin Smith; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ana Hrkac Pustahija; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 8.  Controversies in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Authors:  Andrea V Barrio; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 13.739

9.  Modeling Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): An Overview of CISNET Model Approaches.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jeroen J van den Broek; Xiaoxue Li; Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; Xuelin Huang; Donald L Weaver; Elizabeth S Burnside; Rinaa S Punglia; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Can dedicated breast PET help to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment by differentiating between indolent and potentially aggressive ductal carcinoma in situ?

Authors:  Lucía Graña-López; Michel Herranz; Inés Domínguez-Prado; Sonia Argibay; Ángeles Villares; Manuel Vázquez-Caruncho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.