Literature DB >> 11258773

Long-term results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2 cm vs. 4 cm excision margins for 740 patients with 1-4 mm melanomas.

C M Balch1, S J Soong, T Smith, M I Ross, M M Urist, C P Karakousis, W J Temple, M C Mihm, R L Barnhill, W R Jewell, H J Wanebo, R Desmond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Intergroup Melanoma Surgical Trial began in 1983 to examine the optimal surgical margins of excision for primary melanomas of intermediate thickness (i.e., 1-4 mm). There is now a median 10-year follow-up.
METHODS: There were two cohorts entered into a prospective multi-institutional trial: (1) 468 patients with melanomas on the trunk or proximal extremity who randomly received a 2 cm or 4 cm radial excision margin and (2) 272 patients with melanomas on the head, neck, or distal extremities who received a 2 cm radial excision margin.
RESULTS: A local recurrence (LR) was associated with a high mortality rate, with a 5-year survival rate of only 9% (as a first relapse) or 11% (anytime) compared with an 86% survival for those patients who did not have a LR (P < .0001). The 10-year survival for all patients with a LR was 5%. The 10-year survival rates were not significantly different when comparing 2 cm vs. 4 cm margins of excision (70% vs. 77%) or comparing the management of the regional lymph nodes (observation vs. elective node dissection). The incidences of LR were the same for patients having a 2 cm vs. 4 cm excision margin regardless of whether the comparisons were made as first relapse (0.4% vs. 0.9%) or at anytime (2.1% vs. 2.6%). When analyzed by anatomic site, the LR rates were 1.1% for melanomas arising on the proximal extremity, 3.1% for the trunk, 5.3% for the distal extremities, and 9.4% for the head and neck. The most profound influence on LR rates was the presence or absence of ulceration; it was 6.6% vs. 1.1% in the randomized group involving the trunk and proximal extremity and was 16.2% vs. 2.1% in the non-randomized group involving the distal extremity and head and neck (P < .001). A multivariate (Cox) regression analysis showed that ulceration was an adverse and independent factor (P = .0001) as was head and neck melanoma site (P = .01), while the remaining factors were not significant (all with P > .12).
CONCLUSION: For this group of melanoma patients, a local recurrence is associated with a high mortality rate, a 2-cm margin of excision is safe and ulceration of the primary melanoma is the most significant prognostic factor heralding an increased risk for a local recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11258773     DOI: 10.1007/s10434-001-0101-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  48 in total

Review 1.  Chinese Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma (2015 Edition).

Authors:  Jun Guo; Shukui Qin; Jun Liang; Tongyu Lin; Lu Si; Xiaohong Chen; Zhihong Chi; Chuanliang Cui; Nan Du; Yun Fan; Kangsheng Gu; Fang Li; Junling Li; Yongheng Li; Houjie Liang; Jiwei Liu; Man Lu; Aiping Lu; Kejun Nan; Xiaohui Niu; Hongming Pan; Guoxin Ren; Xiubao Ren; Yongqian Shu; Xin Song; Min Tao; Baocheng Wang; Wenbin Wei; Di Wu; Lingying Wu; Aiwen Wu; Xiaolin Xu; Junyi Zhang; Xiaoshi Zhang; Yiping Zhang; Huiyan Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Mark B Faries; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  IFHNOS Global Continuing Education Program. Current concepts in head & neck surgery and oncology 2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 4.  [Cutaneous malignant melanoma. Excision margins and lymph node dissections].

Authors:  G Sebastian
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Mayo Clinic consensus recommendations for the depth of excision in primary cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Travis E Grotz; Svetomir N Markovic; Lori A Erickson; William S Harmsen; Marianne Huebner; David R Farley; Barbara A Pockaj; John H Donohue; Franklin H Sim; Clive S Grant; Sanjay P Bagaria; Thomas C Shives; Charles M Balch; James W Jakub
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  Optimal excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philip I Haigh; L Andrew DiFronzo; David R McCready
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Review of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in melanoma.

Authors:  Jacob S Ankeny; Brian Labadie; Jason Luke; Eddy Hsueh; Jane Messina; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  Resection Margins in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Is a 1-cm Margin Wide Enough?

Authors:  Matthew C Perez; Felipe R de Pinho; Amanda Holstein; Daniel E Oliver; Syeda M H Naqvi; Youngchul Kim; Jane L Messina; Erin Burke; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Amod A Sarnaik; C Wayne Cruse; Evan J Wuthrick; Louis B Harrison; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Primary excision margins, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and completion lymph node dissection in cutaneous melanoma: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  F C Wright; L H Souter; S Kellett; A Easson; C Murray; J Toye; D McCready; C Nessim; D Ghazarian; N J Look Hong; S Johnson; D P Goldstein; T Petrella
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Is a Wider Margin (2 cm vs. 1 cm) for a 1.01-2.0 mm Melanoma Necessary?

Authors:  Matthew P Doepker; Zachary J Thompson; Kate J Fisher; Maki Yamamoto; Kevin W Nethers; Jennifer N Harb; Matthew A Applebaum; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Amod A Sarnaik; Jane L Messina; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.