Literature DB >> 35186516

Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study.

Shaza Alsharif1,2,3, Ghalib Alasaad2, Mohammed K Bukhari4,1, Abdulaziz Sharkar2, Mohammed Altaf2, Shaymaa Milibari5, Roaa Alsulimani6, Khalid M Alshamrani1,3,7.   

Abstract

Objectives The radiology report is the primary form of communication between the radiologists and referring clinicians. It is a structured document containing several key components pertaining to the interpretation of radiological examinations and may require the addition of follow-up imaging recommendations to optimize patient outcomes. This study aims to determine whether follow-up imaging recommendations are being acknowledged and acted upon by referrers. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital. Prerecorded BESTCare data of patients who underwent abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans between October 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, and received recommendations for further evaluation were collected after obtaining ethical approval from the local authority. Data of patients younger than 14 years old, patients who did not receive a recommendation, and patients who had CT scans that were uploaded to the BESTCare system but were performed outside the institution were excluded. The collected data were recorded in a password-protected Microsoft Excel file for further analysis. Results A total of 523 report recommendations from 422 abdominal and pelvic CT reports were analyzed. The most common organs indicated for CT scan evaluation were the breast (N = 54, 10.33%), kidney (N = 46, 8.80%), lymph node (N = 36, 6.88%), and colon (N = 33, 6.31%). The most common type of further evaluation recommended was further imaging (N = 410, 78.39%). A total of 278 (53.15%) recommendations were not performed, with 199 (71.58%) not having a documented rationale for noncompliance. Conclusion The majority of the follow-up imaging recommendations to ordering physicians were not carried out. This study highlights the need for notification and audit systems to monitor compliance with follow-up recommendations. Improving the communication between radiologists and referring physicians is key to optimizing patient healthcare.
Copyright © 2022, Alsharif et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal and pelvic computed tomography; compliance; ct scan reports; follow-up recommendations; health informatics; medical imaging informatics; radiologist recommendation; radiology report

Year:  2022        PMID: 35186516      PMCID: PMC8844232          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  14 in total

1.  Guide to the radiology report.

Authors:  Lloyd J Ridley
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  Strategies for radiology reporting and communication. Part 1: challenges and heightened expectations.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Adherence to adrenal incidentaloma guidelines is influenced by radiology report recommendations.

Authors:  Binula N Wickramarachchi; Goswin Y Meyer-Rochow; Kim McAnulty; John V Conaglen; Marianne S Elston
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists' recommendations.

Authors:  Aymer Al-Mutairi; Ashley N D Meyer; Paul Chang; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Determining Follow-Up Imaging Study Using Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Sandeep Dalal; Vadiraj Hombal; Wei-Hung Weng; Gabe Mankovich; Thusitha Mabotuwana; Christopher S Hall; Joseph Fuller; Bruce E Lehnert; Martin L Gunn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Uncovering and improving upon the inherent deficiencies of radiology reporting through data mining.

Authors:  Bruce Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center.

Authors:  Bonmyong Lee; Hansel J Otero; Matthew T Whitehead
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-29

8.  Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports?

Authors:  Caroline E Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Tessa S Cook; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Radiologists' Recommendations for Additional Imaging on Inpatient CT Studies: Do Referring Physicians Follow Them?

Authors:  Owen Hanley; Amir Lotfi; Tiara Sanborn; Jennifer L Friderici; Janice Fitzgerald; Poornima Manikantan; Linda Canty; Mihaela S Stefan
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Incidental Findings on Pediatric Abdominal Computed Tomography At A Pediatric Trauma Center.

Authors:  Youanna Daoud; Alexander Philip; Gal Altberg; Hadassa Leader; Jeremy Neuman; Barry Hahn
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 1.484

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.