Literature DB >> 31452006

Determining Follow-Up Imaging Study Using Radiology Reports.

Sandeep Dalal1, Vadiraj Hombal2, Wei-Hung Weng3, Gabe Mankovich1, Thusitha Mabotuwana4, Christopher S Hall4, Joseph Fuller5, Bruce E Lehnert5, Martin L Gunn5.   

Abstract

Radiology reports often contain follow-up imaging recommendations. Failure to comply with these recommendations in a timely manner can lead to delayed treatment, poor patient outcomes, complications, unnecessary testing, lost revenue, and legal liability. The objective of this study was to develop a scalable approach to automatically identify the completion of a follow-up imaging study recommended by a radiologist in a preceding report. We selected imaging-reports containing 559 follow-up imaging recommendations and all subsequent reports from a multi-hospital academic practice. Three radiologists identified appropriate follow-up examinations among the subsequent reports for the same patient, if any, to establish a ground-truth dataset. We then trained an Extremely Randomized Trees that uses recommendation attributes, study meta-data and text similarity of the radiology reports to determine the most likely follow-up examination for a preceding recommendation. Pairwise inter-annotator F-score ranged from 0.853 to 0.868; the corresponding F-score of the classifier in identifying follow-up exams was 0.807. Our study describes a methodology to automatically determine the most likely follow-up exam after a follow-up imaging recommendation. The accuracy of the algorithm suggests that automated methods can be integrated into a follow-up management application to improve adherence to follow-up imaging recommendations. Radiology administrators could use such a system to monitor follow-up compliance rates and proactively send reminders to primary care providers and/or patients to improve adherence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follow-up studies; Medical informatics applications; Natural language processing; Radiology; Supervised machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31452006      PMCID: PMC7064667          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00260-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  14 in total

1.  Safety-Net Academic Hospital Experience in Following Up Noncritical Yet Potentially Significant Radiologist Recommendations.

Authors:  Nadja Kadom; Gemma Doherty; Alexandra Solomon; Madison Close; Scott Friedman; Deborah Gregson; Bradley S Rostad; James M Moses; Alexander Norbash
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy.

Authors:  Cornelius Rosse; José L V Mejino
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Extraction of recommendation features in radiology with natural language processing: exploratory study.

Authors:  Pragya A Dang; Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael A Blake; Thomas J Schultz; Elkan F Halpern; Keith J Dreyer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Follow-up of incidental pulmonary nodules and the radiology report.

Authors:  Denitza P Blagev; James F Lloyd; Karen Conner; Justin Dickerson; Daniel Adams; Scott M Stevens; Scott C Woller; R Scott Evans; C Gregory Elliott
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Implementation of an Automated Radiology Recommendation-Tracking Engine for Abdominal Imaging Findings of Possible Cancer.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Darco Lalevic; Caroline Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Actionable findings and the role of IT support: report of the ACR Actionable Reporting Work Group.

Authors:  Paul A Larson; Lincoln L Berland; Brent Griffith; Charles E Kahn; Lawrence A Liebscher
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Extracting Follow-Up Recommendations and Associated Anatomy from Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Thusitha Mabotuwana; Christopher S Hall; Sandeep Dalal; Joel Tieder; Martin L Gunn
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

8.  Determining Adherence to Follow-up Imaging Recommendations.

Authors:  Thusitha Mabotuwana; Vadiraj Hombal; Sandeep Dalal; Christopher S Hall; Martin Gunn
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations.

Authors:  Christopher L Sistrom; Keith J Dreyer; Pragya P Dang; Jeffrey B Weilburg; Giles W Boland; Daniel I Rosenthal; James H Thrall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports?

Authors:  Caroline E Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Tessa S Cook; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study.

Authors:  Shaza Alsharif; Ghalib Alasaad; Mohammed K Bukhari; Abdulaziz Sharkar; Mohammed Altaf; Shaymaa Milibari; Roaa Alsulimani; Khalid M Alshamrani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-13

2.  A Web Application for Adrenal Incidentaloma Identification, Tracking, and Management Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Wasif Bala; Jackson Steinkamp; Timothy Feeney; Avneesh Gupta; Abhinav Sharma; Jake Kantrowitz; Nicholas Cordella; James Moses; Frederick Thurston Drake
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Recommendations in Second Opinion Reports of Neurologic Head and Neck Imaging: Frequency, Referring Clinicians' Compliance, and Diagnostic Yield.

Authors:  S A Heinz; D Yakar; R A J O Dierckx; M J Lamers; T C Kwee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.966

4.  A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports.

Authors:  Arlene Casey; Emma Davidson; Michael Poon; Hang Dong; Daniel Duma; Andreas Grivas; Claire Grover; Víctor Suárez-Paniagua; Richard Tobin; William Whiteley; Honghan Wu; Beatrice Alex
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.