Literature DB >> 25060597

Adherence to adrenal incidentaloma guidelines is influenced by radiology report recommendations.

Binula N Wickramarachchi1, Goswin Y Meyer-Rochow1,2, Kim McAnulty3, John V Conaglen2, Marianne S Elston2,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5% of all abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans reveal an adrenal incidentaloma. Although most adrenal incidentalomas are benign non-functioning adenomas, lesions may be hormonally active and/or malignant. The aim of this study was to determine adherence to recommended international guidelines and potential influencing factors when an adrenal incidentaloma is identified in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of all CT and MRI reports from December 2009 to December 2011 using a key phrase search to identify patients with an incidental adrenal lesion.
RESULTS: A total of 125 patients with incidental adrenal lesions were identified, of which 74 patients were considered appropriate for further endocrine/radiological workup. Of the 74 patients, only 19 (26%) were initially referred to the endocrine service for investigation; 21/74 (28%) had complete biochemical workup and 24/74 (32%) had imaging follow-up arranged. The reporting radiologist provided advice for follow-up in 31/74 (42%), and action was more likely to be taken when this recommendation was given. Follow-up of the patients who had not received investigation was attempted resulting in assessment of a further 23 patients. Of the 44 patients who have undergone full assessment, four patients were found to have clinically significant lesions (one each of: Cushing's syndrome, phaeochromocytoma, Conn's syndrome and plasmacytoma).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the majority of adrenal incidentalomas may not be investigated according to current international guidelines. The recommendations by the reporting radiologist appear to influence whether a patient is referred for further investigation.
© 2014 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adrenal cortex neoplasm; adrenal gland neoplasm; adrenalectomy; adrenocortical adenoma; health care; quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25060597     DOI: 10.1111/ans.12799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  6 in total

1.  [Clinical analysis of 939 patients with adrenal lesions detected by abdominal computed tomography].

Authors:  Cun-Xia Fan; Jia-Jun Zhang; Ying-Ying Cai; Chun-Yan Wu; Shao-Zhou Zou; Yi-Kai Xu; Yao-Ming Xue; Mei-Ping Guan
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-08-20

2.  Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study.

Authors:  Shaza Alsharif; Ghalib Alasaad; Mohammed K Bukhari; Abdulaziz Sharkar; Mohammed Altaf; Shaymaa Milibari; Roaa Alsulimani; Khalid M Alshamrani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-13

3.  The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center.

Authors:  Bonmyong Lee; Hansel J Otero; Matthew T Whitehead
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-29

4.  Systematic Review: Incidence of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Over 70 Years.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Al Subhi; Veronica Boyle; Marianne S Elston
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2022-07-03

5.  The impact of an adrenal incidentaloma algorithm on the evaluation of adrenal nodules.

Authors:  Leslie S Eldeiry; Marina M Alfisher; Catherine F Callahan; Nancy N Hanna; Jeffrey R Garber
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2018-07-05

6.  WFUMB position paper on the management incidental findings: adrenal incidentaloma.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Jean Michel Correas; Yi Dong; Christian Nolsoe; Susan Campbell Westerway; Christian Jenssen
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2019-07-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.