| Literature DB >> 35177736 |
Manish Kumar1, Shobhit Srivastava1, T Muhammad2.
Abstract
In a culturally different and low-resource setting, where lifestyle habits, including dietary pattern and physical activities differ from those in high-income countries, the association between physical activity and cognition is expected to differ. We aimed to investigate the association between physical activity and cognitive functioning after controlling for potential confounders among older adults in India. Furthermore, gender differences in this relationship were analyzed. Using a national-level data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (2017-2018), this paper employed propensity score matching (PSM) approach to examine the association between physical activities and cognitive functioning among Indian older adults. Cognitive impairment was measured through five broad domains (memory, orientation, arithmetic function, executive function, and object naming). We limit our sample to older adults aged 60 + years, and our final dataset contains 31,464 participants (men = 16,366, and women = 15,098). The results indicated that older adults who engaged in frequent physical activity have greater cognitive functioning than older adults without physical activity after adjusting for various individual, health, lifestyle, and household factors. This association holds true for both older men and older women. The results from the PSM revealed that the cognitive function score was increased by 0.98 and 1.32 points for the frequently physically active older men and women population, respectively. The results demonstrate the possible beneficial effects of frequent physical activity on cognitive functioning among older adults. Thus, regular physical activity can be considered as an effective lifestyle factor to promote healthy cognitive aging.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35177736 PMCID: PMC8854730 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06725-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Conceptual framework for cognitive functioning.
Socio-economic profile of the study respondents, 2017–18.
| Variables | Male | Female | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | CI | Mean | CI | |
| Cognitive score | 26.4 | 26.3–26.5 | 22.1 | 22.0–22.2 |
| Age in years | 69.3 | 69.1–69.4 | 69.1 | 69.0–69.2 |
Percentage of older adults who were involved in frequent physical activity and not involved in frequent physical activity, LASI, 2017–18.
| Variables | Male | Female | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No frequent physical activity | Frequent physical activity | Difference | No frequent physical activity | Frequent physical activity | Difference | |
| Age | ||||||
| Young-old | 53.0 | 72.7 | 19.8 | 57.0 | 75.0 | 18.1 |
| Old-old | 33.8 | 22.8 | − 11.0 | 30.6 | 20.3 | − 10.3 |
| Oldest-old | 13.2 | 4.4 | − 8.8 | 12.5 | 4.7 | − 7.8 |
| Education | ||||||
| No education/primary not completed | 52.5 | 54.9 | 2.4 | 81.4 | 81.0 | − 0.4 |
| Primary | 14.8 | 14.9 | 0.1 | 7.8 | 8.9 | 1.1 |
| Secondary | 21.0 | 19.0 | − 2.0 | 8.1 | 6.7 | − 1.3 |
| Higher | 11.7 | 11.2 | − 0.5 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 0.7 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Currently married | 79.1 | 87.1 | 7.9 | 42.2 | 57.8 | 15.6 |
| Widowed | 18.4 | 10.7 | − 7.7 | 56.0 | 39.2 | − 16.8 |
| Others | 2.5 | 2.2 | − 0.3 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 1.3 |
| Living arrangement | ||||||
| Living alone | 2.9 | 1.5 | − 1.4 | 8.3 | 10.5 | 2.2 |
| Living with spouse | 26.3 | 25.2 | − 1.1 | 14.5 | 20.2 | 5.7 |
| Living with children and spouse | 66.5 | 70.9 | 4.4 | 69.5 | 64.0 | − 5.5 |
| Living with others | 4.3 | 2.4 | − 1.9 | 7.7 | 5.3 | − 2.4 |
| Working status | ||||||
| Never worked | 4.4 | 2.1 | − 2.2 | 49.9 | 24.0 | − 25.9 |
| Currently working | 31.7 | 74.0 | 42.3 | 14.0 | 54.8 | 40.9 |
| Currently not working | 49.6 | 14.0 | − 35.6 | 34.2 | 19.6 | − 14.6 |
| Retired | 14.4 | 9.8 | − 4.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 | − 0.3 |
| Obesity/overweight | ||||||
| No | 84.7 | 83.7 | − 1.0 | 77.2 | 73.9 | − 3.3 |
| Yes | 15.3 | 16.3 | 1.0 | 22.8 | 26.1 | 3.3 |
| Alcohol consumption | ||||||
| No | 72.9 | 71.2 | − 1.7 | 97.6 | 96.4 | − 1.1 |
| Yes | 27.1 | 28.9 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 1.1 |
| Tobacco consumption | ||||||
| No | 41.9 | 38.5 | − 3.4 | 78.0 | 74.9 | − 3.1 |
| Yes | 58.1 | 61.5 | 3.4 | 22.0 | 25.1 | 3.1 |
| Self-rated health | ||||||
| Good | 52.1 | 62.5 | 10.4 | 48.9 | 65.8 | 16.9 |
| Poor | 47.9 | 37.5 | − 10.4 | 51.1 | 34.2 | − 16.9 |
| Difficulty in ADL | ||||||
| No | 75.6 | 85.8 | 10.2 | 72.5 | 80.8 | 8.4 |
| Yes | 24.4 | 14.2 | − 10.2 | 27.6 | 19.2 | − 8.4 |
| Difficulty in IADL | ||||||
| No | 57.4 | 69.4 | 12.0 | 42.2 | 49.0 | 6.8 |
| Yes | 42.6 | 30.6 | − 12.0 | 57.8 | 51.0 | -6.8 |
| Morbidity | ||||||
| 0 | 47.0 | 58.1 | 11.1 | 44.0 | 47.7 | 3.6 |
| 1 | 28.9 | 25.5 | − 3.4 | 29.5 | 34.3 | 4.8 |
| 2 + | 24.1 | 16.4 | − 7.7 | 26.5 | 18.0 | − 8.5 |
| MPCE quintile | ||||||
| Poorest | 21.0 | 20.2 | − 0.8 | 23.0 | 19.1 | − 3.9 |
| Poorer | 21.6 | 20.6 | − 1.0 | 22.1 | 21.8 | − 0.3 |
| Middle | 21.0 | 23.5 | 2.5 | 20.1 | 22.3 | 2.2 |
| Richer | 18.9 | 20.1 | 1.2 | 18.9 | 21.3 | 2.4 |
| Richest | 17.5 | 15.6 | − 1.9 | 16.0 | 15.5 | − 0.4 |
| Religion | 0.0 | |||||
| Hindu | 81.3 | 84.3 | 3.0 | 81.9 | 86.3 | 4.4 |
| Muslim | 12.2 | 10.2 | − 2.1 | 11.4 | 7.0 | − 4.5 |
| Christian | 2.7 | 2.2 | − 0.5 | 3.2 | 2.4 | − 0.8 |
| Others | 3.8 | 3.4 | − 0.4 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 0.9 |
| Caste | ||||||
| Scheduled caste | 18.6 | 19.3 | 0.7 | 19.2 | 17.8 | − 1.4 |
| Scheduled tribe | 7.4 | 8.7 | 1.3 | 7.9 | 12.5 | 4.6 |
| Other backward class | 45.1 | 48.3 | 3.2 | 44.3 | 47.5 | 3.2 |
| Others | 28.9 | 23.8 | − 5.1 | 28.6 | 22.2 | − 6.4 |
| Place of residence | ||||||
| Rural | 70.4 | 77.2 | 6.8 | 68.8 | 72.2 | 3.4 |
| Urban | 29.6 | 22.8 | − 6.8 | 31.2 | 27.8 | − 3.4 |
| Region | ||||||
| North | 13.4 | 8.9 | − 4.5 | 13.2 | 10.0 | − 3.2 |
| Central | 23.1 | 20.7 | − 2.3 | 20.4 | 13.8 | − 6.5 |
| East | 25.3 | 22.3 | − 3.1 | 24.0 | 13.8 | − 10.2 |
| Northeast | 2.7 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 2.9 | − 0.2 |
| West | 14.4 | 22.0 | 7.6 | 16.3 | 30.3 | 14.0 |
| South | 21.0 | 22.7 | 1.7 | 23.1 | 29.2 | 6.1 |
| 100 | 100 | 0.0 | 100 | 100 | 0.0 | |
Differences: Frequent physical activity − No frequent physical activity.
Results of matching estimates showing the effect of frequent physical activity on cognitive scores among older adults, LASI, 2017–2018.
| Treated | Control | Differences | SE | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive score (0–43) | |||||
| Unmatched | 27.346 | 26.617 | 0.728 | 0.126 | |
| ATT | 27.346 | 26.592 | 0.754 | 0.180 | 0.001 |
| ATU | 26.617 | 27.680 | 1.063 | ||
| ATE | 0.986 | ||||
| Cognitive score (0–43) | |||||
| Unmatched | 23.594 | 22.522 | 1.072 | 0.179 | |
| ATT | 23.594 | 22.774 | 0.821 | 0.251 | 0.001 |
| ATU | 22.538 | 23.935 | 1.397 | ||
| ATE | 1.323 | ||||
The model was controlled for individual, health and household factors.
Adjusted regression coefficients (for cognitive scores)—unmatched and PSM models.
| Outcome variable (cognitive score) | Unmatched | PSM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATE | ATT | ||
| Frequent physical activity (Yes vs no) | 0.73* (0.51–0.96) | 1.22* (0.92–1.52) | 0.71* (0.39–1.18) |
| Frequent physical activity (Yes vs no) | 1.09* (0.77–1.40) | 1.29* (0.83–1.76) | 0.74* (0.31–1.18) |
The model was control for individual, health and household factors.
Figure 2Balance plot before and after propensity matching.
Figure 3Overlap plot for the propensity score of each treatment.