Literature DB >> 1952480

Discussing hidden bias in observational studies.

P R Rosenbaum1.   

Abstract

In observational studies or nonrandomized experiments, treated and control groups may differ in their outcomes even if the treatment has no effect; this may happen if the groups were not comparable before the start of treatment. The groups may fail to be comparable in either of two ways: They may differ with respect to characteristics that have been measured, in which case there is an overt bias, or they may differ in ways that have not been measured, in which case there is a hidden bias. Overt biases are controlled through adjustments, such as matching. Hidden bias is more difficult to address because the relevant measurements are not available. A sensitivity analysis asks how much hidden bias would need to be present if hidden bias were to explain the differing outcomes in the treated and control groups. A sensitivity analysis provides a tangible and specific framework for discussing hidden biases.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1952480     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-11-901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  32 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation in the real world. Effectiveness versus efficacy studies.

Authors:  D A Revicki; L Frank
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Association of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with incident cardiovascular events in women, by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B100 levels: a cohort study.

Authors:  Samia Mora; Julie E Buring; Paul M Ridker; Yadong Cui
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Application of potential outcomes to an intentional weight loss latent variable problem.

Authors:  Gary L Gadbury; Thidaporn Supapakorn; Christopher S Coffey; Scott W Keith; David B Allison
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.582

Review 4.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Neighborhood Racial Isolation, Disorder and Obesity.

Authors:  Virginia W Chang; Amy E Hillier; Neil K Mehta
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2009-06-01

6.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.

Authors:  Thérèse A Stukel; Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; David A Alter; Daniel J Gottlieb; Marian J Vermeulen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Time to send the preemie home? Additional maturity at discharge and subsequent health care costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Scott A Lorch; Paul R Rosenbaum; Barbara Medoff-Cooper; Susan Bakewell-Sachs; Andrea Millman; Lanyu Mi; Orit Even-Shoshan; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  A model for pharmacological research-treatment of cocaine dependence.

Authors:  I D Montoya; J M Hess; K L Preston; D A Gorelick
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

9.  The relationship of post-acute home care use to Medicaid utilization and expenditures.

Authors:  Susan M C Payne; David L DiGiuseppe; Negussie Tilahun
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Mental health services use among school-aged children with disabilities: the role of sociodemographics, functional limitations, family burdens, and care coordination.

Authors:  Whitney P Witt; Judith D Kasper; Anne W Riley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.