BACKGROUND: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) comprises a large group of different forms of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. The molecular basis of several CMT subtypes has been clarified during the last 20 years. Since slowly progressive muscle weakness and sensory disturbances are the main features of these syndromes, treatments aim to improve motor impairment and sensory disturbances to improve abilities. Pharmacological treatment trials in CMT are rare. This review was derived from a Cochrane review, Treatment for Charcot Marie Tooth disease, which will be updated via this review and a forthcoming title, Treatments other than ascorbic acid for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) treatment for CMT. SEARCH METHODS: On 21 September 2015, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of treatment for CMT. We also checked clinical trials registries for ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs and quasi-RCTs of any ascorbic acid treatment for people with CMT. Where a study aimed to evaluate the treatment of general neuromuscular symptoms of people with peripheral neuropathy including CMT, we included the study if we were able to identify the effect of treatment in the CMT group. We did not include observational studies or case reports of ascorbic acid treatment in people with CMT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (BG and JB) independently extracted the data and assessed study quality. MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs compared the effect of oral ascorbic acid (1 to 4 grams) and placebo treatment in CMT1A. In five trials involving adults with CMT1A, a total of 622 participants received ascorbic acid or placebo. Trials were largely at low risk of bias. There is high-quality evidence that ascorbic acid does not improve the course of CMT1A in adults as measured by the CMT neuropathy score (0 to 36 scale) at 12 months (mean difference (MD) -0.37; 95% confidence intervals (CI) -0.83 to 0.09; five studies; N = 533), or at 24 months (MD -0.21; 95% CI -0.81 to 0.39; three studies; N = 388). Ascorbic acid treatment showed a positive effect on the nine-hole peg test versus placebo (MD -1.16 seconds; 95% CI -1.96 to -0.37), but the clinical significance of this result is probably small. Meta-analyses of other secondary outcome parameters showed no relevant benefit of ascorbic acid. In one trial, 80 children with CMT1A received ascorbic acid or placebo. The trial showed no clinical benefit of ascorbic acid treatment. Adverse effects did not differ in their nature or abundance between ascorbic acid and placebo. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: High-quality evidence indicates that ascorbic acid does not improve the course of CMT1A in adults in terms of the outcome parameters used. According to low-quality evidence, ascorbic acid does not improve the course of CMT1A in children. However, CMT1A is slowly progressive and the outcome parameters show only small change over time. Longer study durations should be considered, and outcome parameters more sensitive to change over time should be designed and validated for future studies.
BACKGROUND: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) comprises a large group of different forms of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. The molecular basis of several CMT subtypes has been clarified during the last 20 years. Since slowly progressive muscle weakness and sensory disturbances are the main features of these syndromes, treatments aim to improve motor impairment and sensory disturbances to improve abilities. Pharmacological treatment trials in CMT are rare. This review was derived from a Cochrane review, Treatment for Charcot Marie Tooth disease, which will be updated via this review and a forthcoming title, Treatments other than ascorbic acid for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) treatment for CMT. SEARCH METHODS: On 21 September 2015, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of treatment for CMT. We also checked clinical trials registries for ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs and quasi-RCTs of any ascorbic acid treatment for people with CMT. Where a study aimed to evaluate the treatment of general neuromuscular symptoms of people with peripheral neuropathy including CMT, we included the study if we were able to identify the effect of treatment in the CMT group. We did not include observational studies or case reports of ascorbic acid treatment in people with CMT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (BG and JB) independently extracted the data and assessed study quality. MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs compared the effect of oral ascorbic acid (1 to 4 grams) and placebo treatment in CMT1A. In five trials involving adults with CMT1A, a total of 622 participants received ascorbic acid or placebo. Trials were largely at low risk of bias. There is high-quality evidence that ascorbic acid does not improve the course of CMT1A in adults as measured by the CMT neuropathy score (0 to 36 scale) at 12 months (mean difference (MD) -0.37; 95% confidence intervals (CI) -0.83 to 0.09; five studies; N = 533), or at 24 months (MD -0.21; 95% CI -0.81 to 0.39; three studies; N = 388). Ascorbic acid treatment showed a positive effect on the nine-hole peg test versus placebo (MD -1.16 seconds; 95% CI -1.96 to -0.37), but the clinical significance of this result is probably small. Meta-analyses of other secondary outcome parameters showed no relevant benefit of ascorbic acid. In one trial, 80 children with CMT1A received ascorbic acid or placebo. The trial showed no clinical benefit of ascorbic acid treatment. Adverse effects did not differ in their nature or abundance between ascorbic acid and placebo. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: High-quality evidence indicates that ascorbic acid does not improve the course of CMT1A in adults in terms of the outcome parameters used. According to low-quality evidence, ascorbic acid does not improve the course of CMT1A in children. However, CMT1A is slowly progressive and the outcome parameters show only small change over time. Longer study durations should be considered, and outcome parameters more sensitive to change over time should be designed and validated for future studies.
Authors: Burkhard Gess; Dominik Röhr; Robert Fledrich; Michael W Sereda; Ilka Kleffner; Anne Humberg; Johanna Nowitzki; Jan-Kolja Strecker; Hartmut Halfter; Peter Young Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: M E Shy; J Blake; K Krajewski; D R Fuerst; M Laura; A F Hahn; J Li; R A Lewis; M Reilly Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-04-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: E Nelis; C Van Broeckhoven; P De Jonghe; A Löfgren; A Vandenberghe; P Latour; E Le Guern; A Brice; M L Mostacciuolo; F Schiavon; F Palau; S Bort; M Upadhyaya; M Rocchi; N Archidiacono; P Mandich; E Bellone; K Silander; M L Savontaus; R Navon; H Goldberg-Stern; X Estivill; V Volpini; W Friedl; A Gal Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 1996 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Magdalena Zimoń; Jonathan Baets; Leonardo Almeida-Souza; Els De Vriendt; Jelena Nikodinovic; Yesim Parman; Esra Battaloğlu; Zeliha Matur; Velina Guergueltcheva; Ivailo Tournev; Michaela Auer-Grumbach; Peter De Rijk; Britt-Sabina Petersen; Thomas Müller; Erik Fransen; Philip Van Damme; Wolfgang N Löscher; Nina Barišić; Zoran Mitrovic; Stefano C Previtali; Haluk Topaloğlu; Günther Bernert; Ana Beleza-Meireles; Slobodanka Todorovic; Dusanka Savic-Pavicevic; Boryana Ishpekova; Silvia Lechner; Kristien Peeters; Tinne Ooms; Angelika F Hahn; Stephan Züchner; Vincent Timmerman; Patrick Van Dijck; Vedrana Milic Rasic; Andreas R Janecke; Peter De Jonghe; Albena Jordanova Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-09-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Manoj Mannil; Alessandra Solari; Andreas Leha; Ana L Pelayo-Negro; José Berciano; Beate Schlotter-Weigel; Maggie C Walter; Bernd Rautenstrauss; Tuuli J Schnizer; Angelo Schenone; Pavel Seeman; Chandini Kadian; Olivia Schreiber; Natalia G Angarita; Gian Maria Fabrizi; Franco Gemignani; Luca Padua; Lucio Santoro; Aldo Quattrone; Giuseppe Vita; Daniela Calabrese; Peter Young; Matilde Laurà; Jana Haberlová; Radim Mazanec; Walter Paulus; Tim Beissbarth; Michael E Shy; Mary M Reilly; Davide Pareyson; Michael W Sereda Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Erieta Nikolikj Dimitrova; Ivana Božinovikj; Simona Ristovska; Aleksandra Hadzieva Pejcikj; Aleksandra Kolevska; Mirjeta Hasani Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci Date: 2016-07-12
Authors: A K M G Muhammad; Kevin Kim; Irina Epifantseva; Arwin Aghamaleky-Sarvestany; Megan E Simpkinson; Sharon Carmona; Jesse Landeros; Shaughn Bell; John Svaren; Robert H Baloh Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Christian Rominger; Andreas Fink; Bernhard Weber; Ilona Papousek; Andreas R Schwerdtfeger Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Valeria Prada; S Schizzi; I Poggi; L Mori; C Gemelli; M Hamedani; S Accogli; G Maggi; M Grandis; G L Mancardi; A Schenone Journal: J Neurol Neurophysiol Date: 2018-07-30